Child Rapist To Be Beheaded And Crucified

#76
#76
Why let them off with death?

Make them work like absolute dogs for the rest of their life.

That wont work either because the bulk of society is about reform. You know! You have run across the same SOBs over and over again. Jail or Prison is no longer a deterrent. They have made prison too soft. Hug-a-thug centers is what they have become. I'm with you. Put them be-atches on the sides of the roads in chains. No T.V., weights, recreation time. Bread and water to eat. Then let them want to go back
 
#78
#78
That wont work either because the bulk of society is about reform. You know! You have run across the same SOBs over and over again. Jail or Prison is no longer a deterrent. They have made prison too soft. Hug-a-thug centers is what they have become. I'm with you. Put them be-atches on the sides of the roads in chains. No T.V., weights, recreation time. Bread and water to eat. Then let them want to go back

I would prefer the climate extremes of the south west.

I am all about rehab.

Make them make their own camps.

You want a place to sleep, there are the materials.
 
#80
#80
I say bring back the whole devil's island routine. We spend all this time as American fretting over punishment and whether it is cruel and unusual and whether it's something we ought to be doing and so forth.

Fine, I say.

Let's go out and spend one year's worth of the American penal system's cost and buy some island (or we could just dig a really wide canal and use Florida if we had to). We leave a bunch bricks, some tools, a bunch of seeds a few livestock animals. We get the phone company to put in a single phone. Hell, to start out with, I'd even give the first group dumped on shore some tents for a little while.

We drop off all of the criminals from every state and federal prison on the dock and tell them to enjoy their stay.

From there, we simply maintain a secure floating perimeter (which would be far cheaper than running all sorts of prisons and everything that comes with it).

Occasionally, we'd send someone in to pick up the folks whose time was up (and survived) and we'd re-patriate them as citizens. If there was a dought, or a natural disaster, we might drop off food or something every now and then.

If they got industrious enough to raise a crop or something that the mainland wanted, then we might even think about trading with the criminals for corn, or rocks, or whatever. No requirement that they work, though.

Otherwise, we don't worry about punishment or reform. We just let them all sort it out amongst themselves. I imagine you'd see one or two things occur. Either the few reasonably decent types with some brains would band together and beat the degenerates into submission or kill them establishing their own little law and order system (which would likely result in the pedos and the mass murderers "going missing") or they would all live in utter chaos and more or less kill one another constantly. Either way, it wouldn't be our problem.

The amount of money we spend on punishing criminals exceeds what spend on roads and schools in many cases. I say save the money for something else and simply remove all the debate by simply saying that we are not going to punish anyone, we let mother nature sort everything out by forcing them to fend for themselves.

Of course, I am not proposing sending minor offenders to a place like this. This would be for your real maximum security type criminals.

I know, it's a stupid, narrow minded, and overly-simplistic idea, but it would end all the crime and punishment debates and would save the normal citizens a ton of money.

I'm done ranting now...
 
#82
#82
Do drug trafficers deserve this fate?? The Saudis do the same thing to them....
 
#85
#85
Ridiculous. :no:

My reason is that Drugs and Drug abuse are a major cause of whats wrong in society. Thefts, burglaries, homicides(especially gang related) are almost always linked to drugs. Gangs deal dope because of the money and power it brings them. With the drugs and money come the guns to protect the money and drugs. When another gang comes in and tries to establish a foothold, then the bullets fly and the homicides.
Then you have the users. If they are addicted bad enough to Meth or Crack, they will sell their own kids. I know this because I've seen it first hand. Mothers putting their daughters on the streets as prostitutes to support their habits. People stealing from their parents.
Parents neglecting their children(no food, clothing, electricity, water) to be able to spend their money on their next hit. It isnt pretty!! Most people dont see this side of drugs, because they choose not to. They suffer from the "If I ignore it, it goes away" syndrome.
 
Last edited:
#87
#87
I say bring back the whole devil's island routine. We spend all this time as American fretting over punishment and whether it is cruel and unusual and whether it's something we ought to be doing and so forth.

Fine, I say.

Let's go out and spend one year's worth of the American penal system's cost and buy some island (or we could just dig a really wide canal and use Florida if we had to). We leave a bunch bricks, some tools, a bunch of seeds a few livestock animals. We get the phone company to put in a single phone. Hell, to start out with, I'd even give the first group dumped on shore some tents for a little while.

We drop off all of the criminals from every state and federal prison on the dock and tell them to enjoy their stay.

From there, we simply maintain a secure floating perimeter (which would be far cheaper than running all sorts of prisons and everything that comes with it).

Occasionally, we'd send someone in to pick up the folks whose time was up (and survived) and we'd re-patriate them as citizens. If there was a dought, or a natural disaster, we might drop off food or something every now and then.

If they got industrious enough to raise a crop or something that the mainland wanted, then we might even think about trading with the criminals for corn, or rocks, or whatever. No requirement that they work, though.

Otherwise, we don't worry about punishment or reform. We just let them all sort it out amongst themselves. I imagine you'd see one or two things occur. Either the few reasonably decent types with some brains would band together and beat the degenerates into submission or kill them establishing their own little law and order system (which would likely result in the pedos and the mass murderers "going missing") or they would all live in utter chaos and more or less kill one another constantly. Either way, it wouldn't be our problem.

The amount of money we spend on punishing criminals exceeds what spend on roads and schools in many cases. I say save the money for something else and simply remove all the debate by simply saying that we are not going to punish anyone, we let mother nature sort everything out by forcing them to fend for themselves.

Of course, I am not proposing sending minor offenders to a place like this. This would be for your real maximum security type criminals.

I know, it's a stupid, narrow minded, and overly-simplistic idea, but it would end all the crime and punishment debates and would save the normal citizens a ton of money.

I'm done ranting now...

An even easier approach: Let them live at LG's and his ilk! After all, its the Lib's that want to hug them!
 
#91
#91
I agree, nothing positive comes out of gruesome displays like those mentioned above. They are intended for shock value only and would serve to desensitize the public to gruesome acts like these. Remember these are the same tactics people like the Taliban and their ilk used, we are better than that.
 
#93
#93
I agree, nothing positive comes out of gruesome displays like those mentioned above. They are intended for shock value only and would serve to desensitize the public to gruesome acts like these. Remember these are the same tactics people like the Taliban and their ilk used, we are better than that.

I think some on here would be fine with the use of the rack, and burning at the stake, beheading and crucifixtion...probably just for the sake of showboating and getting others on here to agree with them.

I have no problem with capital punishment for the POS child rapists and murderers. Fry them, gas them, stick a needle in them...and let the victims family watch if they so choose. But the mob mentality around here that wants us to go back to public hangings and beheadings in the town square is nonsensical and stupid. Nothing good would come from it and it would do nothing to deter criminals.

Flame away inquisitors and sadists....
 
#94
#94
The only thing I will disagree with is the death penalty.

The death penalty is a waste complete waste and serves no true purpose.

Killing someone is not going to ease your pain and to pretend it does only makes the healing process longer.
 
#95
#95
The only thing I will disagree with is the death penalty.

The death penalty is a waste complete waste and serves no true purpose.

Killing someone is not going to ease your pain and to pretend it does only makes the healing process longer.

I believe the death penalty is overused but there are some cases where in my humble opinion we should not suffer the guilty to live. The DC sniper is a current example.
 
#96
#96
The only thing I will disagree with is the death penalty.

The death penalty is a waste complete waste and serves no true purpose.

Killing someone is not going to ease your pain and to pretend it does only makes the healing process longer.

I can see where you are coming from...but in cases that warrent it, the victims families should have a say so. If it gives them comfort to see the perpetrator die, then that should be primary.

I would like to even see that in cases where that punishment could be handed out, the victims get to decide on death or life in prison. I have no problem after the judicial system has run its course to let the victims family hold the criminals life in their hands.
 
#97
#97
I believe the death penalty is overused but there are some cases where in my humble opinion we should not suffer the guilty to live. The DC sniper is a current example.

Why let him off so easy?

Make him wake up and work 16 hours of hard labor for the rest of his life.
 
#98
#98
I can see where you are coming from...but in cases that warrent it, the victims families should have a say so. If it gives them comfort to see the perpetrator die, then that should be primary.

I would like to even see that in cases where that punishment could be handed out, the victims get to decide on death or life in prison. I have no problem after the judicial system has run its course to let the victims family hold the criminals life in their hands.

Why let them off so easy?

I am also against letting the victims/family members decide the penalty cause at that point no one is thinking rationally.
 
#99
#99
Why let him off so easy?

Make him wake up and work 16 hours of hard labor for the rest of his life.

Someone would argue it was cruel and unusual punishment to be made to work 16 hours a day, instead he would sit in prison, get fat and infect other people who will one day join free society with his toxic views on America.
 
Nothing good would come from it and it would do nothing to deter criminals.


when it comes to child molestors you are probably right since it's an illness, but i bet it's pretty effective for crimes of free will.
 

VN Store



Back
Top