Yep. A return to offensive strike weaponry.Japan has been mulling over changing their constitution that limits the Japanese military to absolute self defense into something more offensive. When it happens, China can take credit for the change; and if things continue down the path that seems inevitable, hopefully China will take some big hits from Japan, too.
They’re huge. They just look small next to the big boat.These things always look neat and sleek, but you have to wonder where they plan to put fuel, electronics, and weapons. The F-35 looks like a pregnant slug with wings, and the information about weapons it carries talks types but not quantities - and external stores change the stealth properties. The wingman drones appear even less capable in terms of numbers. Makes you wonder if the military is back to counting sorties and not results as the statistics. Many books regarding the air war over N Vietnam state that due to shortages of bombs, the mission would still go with high numbers of planes - just fewer munitions - to keep the numbers up.
The Moskva was the Black Sea's flagship, before it became the newest Russian submarine.Sunk Russia’s flagship? I think you’re mistaken.
But you introduce yet another variable for the Chinese to deal with - the fog of war. No fog out there in the desert to shoot through.
And our layered defenses are redundant in many ways, but they are not dependent - if one fails, they do not all fail.
Anyone remember Ras claiming that China was acting in ways that would actually aid countries and not lock them into a debt spiral like western lending practices? And I told him it was bs, they were. all those construction loans were trojan horses to being owned by the Chinese outright.
China's loans pushing world’s poorest countries to brink of collapse.
multiple nations failing to pay back the loans after they got less than promised, by the Chinese, results from the loans.
China has been good on the long game. I wonder if they have another angle they are working.These countries China is dealing with may be uncivilized enough to run them out of there if they attempt to take over.
yeah but they have no tact.China has been good on the long game. I wonder if they have another angle they are working.
It could be to simply stretch the west thinner. Set up these nations for a worse failure, knowing the west will want to swoop in and fix things. And instead of having to fix a small problem we are going to have to deal with a bigger problem.
Beyond the financial stretching some of these nations seemed to have been targeted that were politically unstable. China may be hoping to take advantage of the change in exchange for loan forgiveness. Or again they may be wanting to stretch the west into more areas militarily so that we are less capable of responding to any aggression by China. It would also offer China the same excuse to get involved with boots on the ground. and they have a built in excuse with the outstanding loans.
or they could simply offer another bad loan to float the nations until they are in even worse shape and even deeper in debt.