Clarence Thomas in Hot Water (Alito too!)

#177
#177
#178
#178
hog88 said:
Reuters disagrees with those experts.
Click to expand...
I suppose that opinions will differ on the matter ....

Clarence Thomas Broke the Law and It Isn’t Even Close

Putting the question of legality aside for a moment ... Clarence Thomas was selling influence to the highest bidder. That represents everything that a Supreme Court Justice should not be about. Clarence Thomas is a disgrace. His decisions can be bought.
 
#179
#179
#183
#183
Rasputin_Vol said:
Sounds reasonable in 2023 America. Plus he sexually harassed a black woman and is married to a white woman. Should have never been nominated, imo.
Click to expand...
It is pretty shocking that in 2023 America .... a black man not only is for sale, but is so of his own free will. He wants to be bought.

* Granted, he comes at a high price.
 
#184
#184
TNVOLNAVY said:
I was wondering who paid for all of RBG’s trips around the world to trash the US Constitution.

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/06/scotus-justices-rack-up-trips/

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg disclosed taking more trips than any other justice in 2018, totaling 14. She visited Tel Aviv, Israel where she was awarded a lifetime achievement award by the Genesis Prize Foundation. Shortly following the award ceremony, she disclosed being provided transportation, food and lodging as a tourist and guest of billionaire Israeli businessman Morris Kahn.

Kahn has had business before the Supreme Court before. The high court handed Kahn’s company Amdocs Limited a win in November 2017 when it declined to take up a patent-related case.
Click to expand...
Stopping beating a dead horse...
 
#185
#185
hog88 said:
No you didn’t. Where’s the example of Thomas ruling in this guy’s favor, influencing a case or anything like that.
Click to expand...
Read through Harlan Crow's history. There are numerous cases where Clarence Thomas could have been doing the bidding of his master.
 
#187
#187
BowlBrother85 said:
I suppose that opinions will differ on the matter ....

Clarence Thomas Broke the Law and It Isn’t Even Close

Putting the question of legality aside for a moment ... Clarence Thomas was selling influence to the highest bidder. That represents everything that a Supreme Court Justice should not be about. Clarence Thomas is a disgrace. His decisions can be bought.
Click to expand...

You just made a lot of assumptions there without evidence.
 
#193
#193
hog88 said:
Show some evidence of Thomas selling influence.
Click to expand...


He's hanging out with and accepting luxury perks--worth huge dollars--from GOP activists. That's corruption, dude, plain and simple.
Of course he and his GOP benefactor will say that all the gifts didn't influence him--but let's not be naive. This is how influence peddling works.
 
#196
#196
turbovol said:
He's hanging out with and accepting luxury perks--worth huge dollars--from GOP activists. That's corruption, dude, plain and simple.
Of course he and his GOP benefactor will say that all the gifts didn't influence him--but let's not be naive. This is how influence peddling works.
Click to expand...

How many cases has Thomas heard that involve this guy or his companies? How many have even been in front of SCOTUS?
 
#197
#197
BowlBrother85 said:
It is pretty shocking that in 2023 America .... a black man not only is for sale, but is so of his own free will. He wants to be bought.

* Granted, he comes at a high price.
Click to expand...
BowlBrother85 said:
Read through Harlan Crow's history. There are numerous cases where Clarence Thomas could have been doing the bidding of his master.
Click to expand...

I didn't know BB was such a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#198
#198
ClearwaterVol said:
Members of Congress have no duty of impartiality. It is of paramount importance that members of the judiciary remain impartial. Even the appearance of bias or impropriety taints the process.
Click to expand...
Except the nomination system we have is completely partisan and biased. The entire court is tainted by politics because of that nomination system. Should we impeach the entire court?
 
#200
#200
hog88 said:
SCOTUS and these vacations are not covered.
Click to expand...
Yes they are....and if they are not (Which they are) they are now and totally unethical anyway you look at it.
hog88 said:
How many cases has Thomas heard that involve this guy or his companies? How many have even been in front of SCOTUS?
Click to expand...
It makes no difference... Geez Judge in your pocket. A lot of questions for someone who thinks he is innocent. Regardless of the number of Cases before the Supreme court that he has heard he broke ethics law regarding the receiving of gifts...LOL
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top