True!Sounds like something to aspire to. Especially if Harbaugh is still coaching the Wolverines.
That one raised my eyebrows a bit too frankly. I’ve always thought wood burned fairly cleani would like to hear the reasoning behind wood fuel being worse than fossil fuels.
conventional wisdom says the carbon in wood is fairly " active" as we are just recycling it. the carbon in fossil fuels has been locked away for millions of years and we can't "recycle" it.
This might be the likely reason.i would like to hear the reasoning behind wood fuel being worse than fossil fuels.
conventional wisdom says the carbon in wood is fairly " active" as we are just recycling it. the carbon in fossil fuels has been locked away for millions of years and we can't "recycle" it.
Gunn co-authored a 2010 study that concluded the amount of carbon released per unit of energy is actually greater for forest biomass than it is for fossil fuels. That’s because wood isn’t a very energy-dense material, which means you have to burn a lot more tons of it to match the energy output of gas or coal.
That's how I read it. Potential energy is one way I have heard that referred to. Which is a pretty "duh" statement.I think it’s just referring to energy density for wood vs fossil fuel. Per unit mass fossil fuel is dirtier but you use less of it than wood to release the same joules of energy
I think it’s just referring to energy density for wood vs fossil fuel. Per unit mass fossil fuel is dirtier but you use less of it than wood to release the same joules of energy
Oh the cancel culture is already lining up the attack on him I’m sure.I am waiting for the locals response to this guy.
I had never heard of him so no idea how legit he is considered and how much of a blow this may actually be. I figure we will see responses eventually ridiculing this guy as a sell out or fake.
This is my side.Democrats have nothing to run on, they must create fear and then promise to solve it. This is how they get votes by creating division. Republicans are stupid for not coming up with real environmental solutions to deal with real issues. I don't think anyone would disagree with protecting nature.
Demoralized? Autocorrect helping you out on demonize? But yeah I agree with both of you. Nobody is against nature and the environment. But the fix can’t be worse than the problem.This is my side.
You can sell the crap put of this stuff to preppers, farmers, anyone with any type of self independence on their mind. Cut your bills, live off the land.
But like you said the left politicized and demoralized the issue before it could take hold. Which tends to have the opposite effect.
Should have just been "moralized"Demoralized? Autocorrect helping you out on demonize? But yeah I agree with both of you. Nobody is against nature and the environment. But the fix can’t be worse than the problem.