Climate Change Report

At mean sea level on earth we can interchange weight and mass and still be quite accurate. That’s why I put my edit in above. I do this all the time because I am a lazy old engineer. If I ever have to design a control system working outside our atmosphere I’ll worry about gravitational force. I really hope in the 4ish years I have left I don’t have to 🤷‍♂️
I'm a fan of "then a miracle occurs" with the gsubc myself.
 
WRONG WRONG WRONG.

Dude, you are rambling incoherently and literally just making stuff up. Are you a member of Trump's cabinet? If not, you should apply.

The epitome of arrogance is to say we can't smell our own sh*t on our knees. We did it. We are responsible. It's really happening, and you can't pull a Dumb Donald and blame someone else.

CO2 levels are booming. Global temperatures are rising. 98% of scientists agree.

You're welcome to deny reality. I'll go about my life working with the majority of responsible citizens in this country who agree global warming is a problem. Meanwhile, you stick your head back in the sand. Your grandkids can thank me later. :)

SOURCE: NASA

View attachment 212845

Cite the resource that 100% says that humans are responsible for most of the climate change this time around, please. I'd like to read that.

More importantly... who the hell sh**s on thier knees? How does that even work?

As far as the "98%" thing. Can you please cite the two questions in the survey that resulted in claim that 98% of scientists agree on climate change/global warming and human contribution. Also can you direct me to a research facility, that recieves government funds, to explore faults in the human contribution to the issue?

One of the problems with not knowing about academic currency or how it works...is that you dont know how academics make a name for themselves and improve their position. (Hint, it ain't teaching you or your kids). So we are left to fill in the substantial blanks between what is fact and what is assumed.

Climate change is very real, most people with cognative function are aware of that fact. The question is how much we contribute and what can be done about it.

After all, if we never questioned science...the earth is still flat, there are nine planets, leaches are the "go to" blood infection treatment, HIV has no treatment, man cant fly... ect. Science is ever changing and only advanced by people ridiculed for questioning it. Study it just a little and you'll find that it's true.
 
Cite the resource that 100% says that humans are responsible for most of the climate change this time around, please. I'd like to read that.

More importantly... who the hell sh**s on thier knees? How does that even work?

As far as the "98%" thing. Can you please cite the two questions in the survey that resulted in claim that 98% of scientists agree on climate change/global warming and human contribution. Also can you direct me to a research facility, that recieves government funds, to explore faults in the human contribution to the issue?

One of the problems with not knowing about academic currency or how it works...is that you dont know how academics make a name for themselves and improve their position. (Hint, it ain't teaching you or your kids). So we are left to fill in the substantial blanks between what is fact and what is assumed.

Climate change is very real, most people with cognative function are aware of that fact. The question is how much we contribute and what can be done about it.

After all, if we never questioned science...the earth is still flat, there are nine planets, leaches are the "go to" blood infection treatment, HIV has no treatment, man cant fly... ect. Science is ever changing and only advanced by people ridiculed for questioning it. Study it just a little and you'll find that it's true.

Do you really need 100% agreement on something... anything... before you would take action? Of course not. Even citing your examples, you couldn't get 100% agreement that the Earth is round today.

This subject is well-researched. There is no secret cabal of scheming scientists merrily lining their pockets with taxpayers' money, while laughing behind our backs. Come on, man.

It sounds like you're mostly up to speed on this issue, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize it's a real problem that we've created.

The Causes of Climate Change
 

So my statement was "There is no secret cabal of scheming scientists merrily lining their pockets with taxpayers' money, while laughing behind our backs."

And your response - proof that this is incorrect - is a link to the EPA. LMAO.

I gather you think most every government employee is lining their pockets and laughing all the way to the bank with your money, right?
 
So my statement was "There is no secret cabal of scheming scientists merrily lining their pockets with taxpayers' money, while laughing behind our backs."

And your response - proof that this is incorrect - is a link to the EPA. LMAO.

I gather you think most every government employee is lining their pockets and laughing all the way to the bank with your money, right?
Everyone? No. Most of them, or enough of them to make a generic statement yes.

And I am talking from some personal experience with the EPA. Once you get above the ground level guys, most are there to further their career and collect a pay check.
 
...Once you get above the ground level guys, most are there to further their career and collect a pay check.

And this differs from the private sector how?

Dude, your whole premise that scientists have somehow concocted this is pure fantasy and nothing more than conspiracist fodder.
 
Oh climate change is very real and there is a data based historical record on that.

Man made climate change or the percentage we are causing is the debate and some of us are much more skeptical than others is all?
Yep, it has gotten hotter and colder over the last few thousand years and will continue. Glaciers came and disappeared.
 

VN Store



Back
Top