Climate Change Report

[LouderVol]

Countries with exponential population growth have people most at risk of death due to climate change. Perhaps Earth is maintaining its homeostasis?

I kinda have a whole theory about this. Wont share on the board. Not thought out enough to really link 1 and 2 together. But let's say I agree with your last line, but a lot more than just CC

 

[McDad]

I kinda have a whole theory about this. Wont share on the board. Not thought out enough to really link 1 and 2 together. But let's say I agree with your last line, but a lot more than just CC

Mother earth commits infanticide to save herself?

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

I have solar electricity.

Hmmm solar panels that are made with and in a facility that requires fossil fuels.

 

[Mick]

Hmmm solar panels that are made with and in a facility that requires fossil fuels.

I bet you think that the manufacturing process create a bigger carbon footprint than the use of the panels. Is that what you think BOT?

 

[LouderVol]

Mother earth commits infanticide to save herself?

infantcide, not really. much more delicious and ban worthy than that.

 

[McDad]

infantcide, not really. much more delicious and ban worthy than that.

Text it to me. Btw...no reply on the meme i gifted you this am for you know who???

 

[McDad]

I bet you think that the manufacturing process create a bigger carbon footprint than the use of the panels. Is that what you think BOT?

Mick baiting BOT:

 

[Rishvol]

Mother earth commits infanticide to save herself?

The Happening? We're all going to talk to fake plants now?

 

[McDad]

The Happening? We're all going to talk to fake plants now?

More plausible than man made calamitous global climate change. Those plants are ominous. I don't trust corn, myself. It stalks me.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

I bet you think that the manufacturing process create a bigger carbon footprint than the use of the panels. Is that what you think BOT?

Nope. Just stating that our entire manufacturing process that allows us to exist like we do is 100% dependent on fossil fuels.

The climate change mouth breathers would love to be able to dispute that fact. But they cannot.

 

[Rishvol]

More plausible than man made calamitous global climate change. Those plants are ominous. I don't trust corn, myself. It stalks me.

That's why I get mine from a jar

 

[McDad]

That's why I get mine from a jar

Smart. Also good for molotov cocktails just in case we got to burn a gator stadium to the ground.

 

[LouderVol]

Text it to me. Btw...no reply on the meme i gifted you this am for you know who???

i sent it to they who must not be named.

 

[McDad]

i sent it to they who must not be named.

But no "thx bro"? Or, "way to hit me wif dem hahas, homie"?

 

[Roustabout]

Problem solved. Iceland has tech that removes co2 from the air and fuses it with rock within the earth. Only has to be implemented on global scale.

This plant captures from the air, but as the article mentions, the key is capturing at the source. It may be too early to abandon coal as its cheap and available. If scrubbers could be integrated then coal could be the cleanest and best energy source.

World’s first “negative emissions” plant turns carbon dioxide into stone

 

[Mick]

Nope. Just stating that our entire manufacturing process that allows us to exist like we do is 100% dependent on fossil fuels.

The climate change mouth breathers would love to be able to dispute that fact. But they cannot.

No it's not. Ever hear of the TVA or Nuclear?

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Let me get this straight. You're all bent out of shape because two teenagers are concerned about the government's lack of action regarding addressing climate change, yet we have a President who, contrary to the scientific consensus, thinks climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese? That's your story? Those two teenagers could talk circles around Trump when it comes to climate change, that's a fact!

You are beyond idiotic on this.

 

[1972 Grad]

You are beyond idiotic on this.

It's Ribs, after all.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Smart. Also good for molotov cocktails just in case we got to burn a gator stadium to the ground.

Can I help? please.

 

[GreyWolf1129]

No it's not. Ever hear of the TVA or Nuclear?

What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

I served 20 years in the Navy. Submarines. Nuclear powered. Our only limit on how long we could stay out, or submerged, was the amount of food we could carry. Everything else we needed to survive, we produced. We took seawater, made it into fresh water, and had water to drink, cook, and bathe. We took that same fresh water...ran it through a few more processes, and had oxygen to breathe, and pure water for the battery and the reactor. We had equipment to scrub the CO2 we produced as humans, and nitrogen burners to get rid of the bad gas.

And in 20 years, not one Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or Fukushima. Mind you, this was but one career on 5 subs while there were at least 40 others just like mine at sea. The Navy has made it's mistakes, but when it comes to running a floating nuclear power plant in conditions that would make GE engineers puke, well...there's a reason why GE, and others, hire Navy nuke engineers just as fast as they get out or retire. Hyman Rickover built a bulletproof system, and it's working to this day.

If you want to get away from fossil fuels, there is only one answer that will meet existing and projected future needs. Solar, hydroelectric, wind power, and anything "green" is a guaranteed nationwide blackout at some point.

So it's coal and gas, or nuclear. Pick your poison.

 

[Roustabout]

I served 20 years in the Navy. Submarines. Nuclear powered. Our only limit on how long we could stay out, or submerged, was the amount of food we could carry. Everything else we needed to survive, we produced. We took seawater, made it into fresh water, and had water to drink, cook, and bathe. We took that same fresh water...ran it through a few more processes, and had oxygen to breathe, and pure water for the battery and the reactor. We had equipment to scrub the CO2 we produced as humans, and nitrogen burners to get rid of the bad gas.

And in 20 years, not one Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or Fukushima. Mind you, this was but one career on 5 subs while there were at least 40 others just like mine at sea. The Navy has made it's mistakes, but when it comes to running a floating nuclear power plant in conditions that would make GE engineers puke, well...there's a reason why GE, and others, hire Navy nuke engineers just as fast as they get out or retire. Hyman Rickover built a bulletproof system, and it's working to this day.

If you want to get away from fossil fuels, there is only one answer that will meet existing and projected future needs. Solar, hydroelectric, wind power, and anything "green" is a guaranteed nationwide blackout at some point.

So it's coal and gas, or nuclear. Pick your poison.

Great testimony and example that climate change is about control and not clean energy. With nuclear we could have a surplus of energy that would supply the grid. If electric vehicles are going to happen you’ve got to supply the grid.

 

[Mick]

I served 20 years in the Navy. Submarines. Nuclear powered. Our only limit on how long we could stay out, or submerged, was the amount of food we could carry. Everything else we needed to survive, we produced. We took seawater, made it into fresh water, and had water to drink, cook, and bathe. We took that same fresh water...ran it through a few more processes, and had oxygen to breathe, and pure water for the battery and the reactor. We had equipment to scrub the CO2 we produced as humans, and nitrogen burners to get rid of the bad gas.

And in 20 years, not one Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or Fukushima. Mind you, this was but one career on 5 subs while there were at least 40 others just like mine at sea. The Navy has made it's mistakes, but when it comes to running a floating nuclear power plant in conditions that would make GE engineers puke, well...there's a reason why GE, and others, hire Navy nuke engineers just as fast as they get out or retire. Hyman Rickover built a bulletproof system, and it's working to this day.

If you want to get away from fossil fuels, there is only one answer that will meet existing and projected future needs. Solar, hydroelectric, wind power, and anything "green" is a guaranteed nationwide blackout at some point.

So it's coal and gas, or nuclear. Pick your poison.

Great testimony and example that climate change is about control and not clean energy. With nuclear we could have a surplus of energy that would supply the grid. If electric vehicles are going to happen you’ve got to supply the grid.

The plan would be to phase out coal. Not much pushback about Nuclear energy as there was 30 years ago.

 

[Roustabout]

The plan would be to phase out coal. Not much pushback about Nuclear energy as there was 30 years ago.

Did you not read the link. This is proven and established tech. If you could neutralize CO2 would you support coal fired plants?

 

[Mick]

Did you not read the link. This is proven and established tech. If you could neutralize CO2 would you support coal fired plants?

Thats been around for awhile but was cost prohibitive for the coal fired power plants. I don't know if that's changed and if the industry would adopt that "standard" or "regulation", I don't see why not.

I probably read the article 2 years ago.

 

[82_VOL_83]

Clearly, this particular Administration is not capable of running a neighborhood lemonade stand, never mind addressing an issue like climate change. If you haven't noticed, the anti-science President has done everything in his power to accelerate climate change - hey, let's burn more coal, that sounds like a good plan! By the way, the science is settled, thinking otherwise is simply asinine.

The people of Kentucky and W. VA thank you. Make sure you don't use any "non-organic" electricity when you flip that light switch.