madtownvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 6,144
- Likes
- 24,992
Whooa back to Holly even!! Let's do the time warp againKim scoring the best recruiting class of the post Pat era after coaching just 4 games proves Holly and Kellie were robbing UT blind.
Actually , Holly did great on the recruiting front and routinely had top 5 classes. It was her final top 5 class that kept her on the job for an extra year.
But, she was coaching in the pre-NIL era.
I am not saying that CKC's success is all about better NIL funds. She still had to beat out a lot of top programs and coaches (who had deep NIL pockets) to get these signings. So, she is a difference maker.
But, if Kellie was hamstrung as some posters state in regard to subpar NIL support, we have to also acknowledge that she was not competing on a level playing field.
The fact that Tennessee kept making the short list of top recruits only to lose out to schools who were ahead on NIL suggest that indeed the support packages played a role in her failures in high school recruiting.
It is just weird to accuse Kellie and even Holly of "robbing" UT.
Last edited: