VolsFanRJ
Formerly Tennisguy
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2008
- Messages
- 7,735
- Likes
- 37
If one guy can't catch. Blame the guy. If every WR on the team drops passes then its the coach.
Yes. WR's drop passes.... but not in the volumes we witnessed this year. If the WR coach is not responsible for players learning to catch... then why pay him a salary? Any GA can organize drills.
You got to remember that North played rb in hs and was learning to play wr on the fly. Coach Z said it his self when Hooker asked him about Smith's drops he said Smith was forced to play to early because they were so thin at wr and on any other team he would have started out on the practice squad. Most of things I have heard from the talking heads on the radio that are around the team say that coach Z is one of the best coaches on the staff.
And from your last statement... you would have us to believe that UT did a grand job of finding all the 4* WR's who had trouble catching the ball.
Why are you so willing to throw the players under the bus in an effort to put no blame at all on the coach?
Yes. The players ultimately have to put in the work and make the play. But again, when a unit underperforms then it isn't likely just the players.
This.
I would love to see what Volnation thinks are the job responsibilities of an assistant coach at this level. Let's see...talk to the press about how bad your players are, show up to the public meet & greet events and recruit...that about cover it? Of course, if recruiting starts slipping, I'm sure that won't be part of their responsibilities either. Pretty sweet job.
Sounds like a post from someone who doesn't know a football is oval rather than round. Coaches can teach all the correct techniques but they can not run out on the field during a game and demonstrate-teach-coach. That is done in little league or peewee football. A player IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/HER'S actions on the field. Some learn quickly, some never learn. We have had a few who have never learned and many who have learned. Ideally, You have enough that learn to be efficient at their craft. If not, you play what you have.
We managed all of 3 points against Missouri. I don't think setting the edge on defense was the only big issue there.
if someone has been on a field, they understand it. If they never have, they argue about it
Haha. Very true. The only way you learn to catch the ball is by doing it. The only thing that a wr can learn to help is to know when to look back to the qb and to look the ball in. Catching is a fundamental skill of the position and there is only so much a coach can do to improve upon that. You drill, like everyone else, and stay after practice if your struggling.
So, you're saying, essentially, that we don't even need a WR coach. Good to know.
No. I'm saying that Malone is the best WR at his allstar game practice and he is snagging everything, prior to being coached in college. Going against future pro dbs and getting the ball from elite qb's with arms stronger than we put on the field, he's catching it. Like almost all of them do. Imagine a highly rated WR that can't already catch the ball, has to be taught, and was taught how to catch in college. Can you give me one example?
You guys evidently think that is taught by wr coaches, some of which played baseball instead of football in our recent past. I'm simply explaining the basic idea that wr's know how to catch a football to get SEC offers, and you two are arguing about it.
You got to remember that North played rb in hs and was learning to play wr on the fly. Coach Z said it his self when Hooker asked him about Smith's drops he said Smith was forced to play to early because they were so thin at wr and on any other team he would have started out on the practice squad. Most of things I have heard from the talking heads on the radio that are around the team say that coach Z is one of the best coaches on the staff.
Sounds like a post from someone who doesn't know a football is oval rather than round. Coaches can teach all the correct techniques but they can not run out on the field during a game and demonstrate-teach-coach. That is done in little league or peewee football. A player IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/HER'S actions on the field. Some learn quickly, some never learn. We have had a few who have never learned and many who have learned. Ideally, You have enough that learn to be efficient at their craft. If not, you play what you have.
You only read what your tunnelvisioned eyes want to see. I haven't said anything positive about his other coaching techniques, wr route running, etc. You can't differentiate between those things and catching the football.
So it's your contention that, when we offered and signed Josh Smith, he could catch a football effectively? Then what happened?
LOL... I have "tunnelvision"? That's laughable coming from someone who goes nuts any time respectful, objective criticism is leveled at anyone on this coaching staff.
Yep. That's a GREAT way to win an argument... poison the well rather than dealing with the facts.Sounds like a post from someone who doesn't know a football is oval rather than round.
OH.... gotcha. College coaches aren't responsible for constantly reinforcing the fundamentals of catching a football since that should have been learned when they were 8. If they didn't... or are inconsistent... or are ineffective... Oh well, not the UT WR coach's responsibility to fix.Coaches can teach all the correct techniques but they can not run out on the field during a game and demonstrate-teach-coach. That is done in little league or peewee football.
EXACTLY what I said... but you ignored that part since I also criticized the coach.A player IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/HER'S actions on the field.
Some learn quickly, some never learn. We have had a few who have never learned and many who have learned. Ideally, You have enough that learn to be efficient at their craft. If not, you play what you have.