I should've included moving forward, last year they had far greater talent than everyone, and a superior coach (imo), moving forward with teams like Baylor (who should be much improved) Maryland (who seems to have the players every year but he also seems to outcoach) Ohio State (all of their transfers seem to be eligible at the same time lol) and South Carolina I would love to see how they do out of conference this year but what I was saying was their in conference schedule will always put them in a greater seed come tournament time because they are likely to always win their conference (it's no fault of Geno's because I'm sure he would prefer to be in a better conference)
I just don't know that winning an AAC championship has a major factor in them getting a #1 seed. I would think it is actually more likely that loosing the AAC title would hurt them more than winning would ever help them.. if you get what I am saying.
I would wager that over the course of the 2015-2016 season, UCONN has knocked off ACC champion Notre Dame (91-81), Big East champion Depaul (86-70), Big 10 champion Maryland (83-73) Southern Conference champion Tennessee-Chattanooga (79-31) and SEC champion South Carolina (66-54). Those wins likely had a lot more to do with the #1 seed than anything they could do in conference although with USF being ranked beating them 3 times in conference and in the conference tourney was marginally helpful.
They took on all comers and performed well and if they weren't as good as advertised it likely would have shown up when they had to play the SEC runner up Miss State whom they beat by a ridiculous margin and then the PAC 12 Champions Oregon State who I believe lost by 30ish?
That's the problem with UConn though... when they are the #1 seed over all... they really are the #1 seed over all. They are as advertised 99% of the time and for some sports fans especially opposing fans that's hard to deal with.
Coaching can make up for a lot of things. I think this along with the players they recruit, and the willingness of those players to learn and grow over 4 years it what makes them hard to beat.
Last I checked there have only been 9 coaches who have beaten Geno & staff in the last 10 years. Of those 9 coaches 5 already have at least 1 National Championship, 5 have 800 or more wins, and all but 2 have at least 300 wins. So basically he generally loses to his "peers" when he does lose. So if anyone wants to join that list this is definitely the year to get your W.
I thought someone did an analysis on here earlier in the year that showed that Tennessee had a starting 5 of players that were all ranked in the top 15 in their class last year so the players were comparable from that stand point... could be wrong on that though.