Colin Kaepernick sits during national anthem

Because white supremacy isn't limited to America. Its global.

No matter where we go around the world, white is right and black is wrong. White colonialists took over the entire world and have had black and brown people living in servitude since the 1500s.

White supremacy is the issue. Not simply America.

Given the lack of consistency within the context of race (considering there are many more than just two), your stance sounds more like a black inferiority argument than a white supremacy argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Interesting.

White people lose their mind when a black man speaks the truth.

Colin Kaepernick was brave to say what he did. Its a sentiment most black people agree with but are afraid to say because of the backlash.

I'll tell you what's interesting, he's never had a problem with it until he's about to lose his starting job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Lol.... Where exactly did you come up with this BS?
I think you should ask Huff if he has any history books he can loan you. He's into economics, but I'm not sure about history. You should ask him anyway.

Of course i'm into history, but not sure what d4h is talking about
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
8 years as POTUS with a house and senate that won't work with you can't change hundreds of years of oppression. I swear I'm surprised some of you can breathe and type at the same time.

8 years? Wtf are you talking about?

He crammed Obamacare down our throats with a democratic congress and senate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I'll tell you what's interesting, he's never had a problem with it until he's about to lose his starting job.

If you've ever looked at his Twitter timeline, it's basically a Shaun King (sjw, fake black guy) and New York Times circle jerk.
 
8 years as POTUS with a house and senate that won't work with you can't change hundreds of years of oppression. I swear I'm surprised some of you can breathe and type at the same time.

That's a two way street chief. Many times congress came to BO with bills that were a meeting in the middle, as he asked for. Then he does a 180 and says no, that's not what I want. No deal. If he didn't get 100% of what he wanted, he would veto. That's not how that s*** works when you don't have the numbers in congress.
 
That's a two way street chief. Many times congress came to BO with bills that were a meeting in the middle, as he asked for. Then he does a 180 and says no, that's not what I want. No deal. If he didn't get 100% of what he wanted, he would veto. That's not how that s*** works when you don't have the numbers in congress.

You can't reason with stupidity, it's the liberal way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Black guilt.

His stance is very interesting. White supremacy doctrine has definitely been a western societal component, especially during the 19th century, but it wasn't some global, white big brother type of conspiracy like D4H apparently believes.

The most crippling circumstance to the black race (sub Saharan Africans) is and always has been geography. It isn't their fault, they've just really gotten the proverbial short end of the geographical, and thus, social stick for centuries, if not millennia. The fruits of that tree remain very noticeable to this day, obviously. But whether people can see it or not, as it is a long and tedious process, progress has been and continues to be made.

I see black folks as simply people who want the same things in life as I do. I understand that history and circumstance have not been in their favor, and I do, sincerely, empathize with them. But this pointing the finger at white people and blaming them for everything solves absolutely nothing. The scope of this issue is far too big for that nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Barack Obama is a tool for white supremacy.

He hasn't done anything for black people in the last 8 years.

In fact, he has systemically made things worse.

Look I blasted you for your comments, but I want your side. I guess I'm interested in what the POTUS should have done to make life better for African- Americans in this country and how he would go about doing it. Honestly, I think he tried by involving himself in high profile cases that involved divided races, and it ended backfiring on him horribly
 
Asian Americans benefit from the sacrifices made by black people during the civil rights movement.

If it wasn't for black people they wouldn't even be in this country.

This may be one of the dumbest things I've read on volnation. And, anyone that has read this, immediately lost IQ points.

May God have mercy on your soul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
I may not agree with the position, but i respect his right to express his position. He is drawing attention to what he feels is a problem.
 
I may not agree with the position, but i respect his right to express his position. He is drawing attention to what he feels is a problem.

He is drawing attention to himself, not the perceived problem. Whether or not it's for personal reasons or making a political stance is up for debate.

However, it's very simple. Do you honestly think people are going to focus more on the problem or his actions? Because at this point, the reasoning is ignored (even if he had good intentions) and the action itself is despised. And in turn, he is going to be despised and the stance he wants to promote will be ignored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
He is drawing attention to himself, not the perceived problem. Whether or not it's for personal reasons or making a political stance is up for debate.

However, it's very simple. Do you honestly think people are going to focus more on the problem or his actions? Because at this point, the reasoning is ignored (even if he had good intentions) and the action itself is despised. And in turn, he is going to be despised and the stance he wants to promote will be ignored.

If he said something like this while having multiple organizations to help the black community with outreach, he might have a better reception than pouting on the sideline and refusing to do something not related to a current day oppression. I'd like to hear what specifically is oppressive today. Not 70 years ago, not 300. Today.
 
He is drawing attention to himself, not the perceived problem. Whether or not it's for personal reasons or making a political stance is up for debate.

However, it's very simple. Do you honestly think people are going to focus more on the problem or his actions? Because at this point, the reasoning is ignored (even if he had good intentions) and the action itself is despised. And in turn, he is going to be despised and the stance he wants to promote will be ignored.

He's using his position to draw attention to the problem. People are talking about the problem as well as his actions. I find it somewhat odd that people who claim to support an individual's right get so angry about this particular expression.

At the end of the day he refused to stand for a song. He didn't express support for cop killers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
He's using his position to draw attention to the problem. People are talking about the problem as well as his actions. I find it somewhat odd that people who claim to support an individual's right get so angry about this particular expression.

At the end of the day he refused to stand for a song. He didn't express support for cop killers.

No one is angry that he did it. People are frustrated that he's a hypocritical idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
He's using his position to draw attention to the problem. People are talking about the problem as well as his actions. I find it somewhat odd that people who claim to support an individual's right get so angry about this particular expression.

At the end of the day he refused to stand for a song. He didn't express support for cop killers.

No, people aren't taking about the "problem" any more than they were before. They are talking about him and his actions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top