0nelilreb
Don’t ask if you don’t want the truth .
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 28,366
- Likes
- 45,485
Being oversized I’m not too worried about an AI unless they figure out a way to make 22’ wide , 17’5 tall and 112’ long , float above everybody . Lol
I don't think we'll see it in the next 25+ years without a major revamp of the highway system. What I can see is trucks platooned/slaved together (4-5 of them) with 1 operator in the lead truck controlling the units with the aid of computers.
Already discussed in post #693Make it happen then what’s the hold up ?
That’s the lie that the Teamsters will push.
Will your AV look around and notice the asshat driving crazy and adjust accordingly ? Can your AV anticipate what other drivers are about to do based on years of experience and be prepared for them to pass you doing 80 then pull in front of you or will it just react when they do it ?
It probably will, but what it won't do is have the experience to know/feel something isn't right and adjust accordingly.
Sooner or later it will happen. Technology always wins.I definitely agree that the Teamsters would fight this tooth and nail. Don't bet against the Longshoremen refusing to load trucks not driven by their "brothers". Whether the technology is there or not, acceptance is going to be the problem, and unions have been very effective at blocking stuff for decades. With trains doing the "autonomous driving" they have their railroad buddies covered. This goes back again to the fact that the unions greased a lot of congressional palms and were allowed to grow into a monster. Port operators cannot work together with trucking company owners against unions, but unions can work together all day long against one or more companies. Antitrust regulation only works one way, labor has always been the beneficiary, and you can bet labor is doing its part to create the overloaded port boondoggle.
It’s not hate. It’s understanding reality. I didn’t hate key punch operators or switchboard workers when technology made them obsolete.
Sooner or later it will happen. Technology always wins.
Is it really a win, or is it just change for change sake? Is replacing human labor with automation truly a win - idle hands and all? Remember, this is coming from an engineer - the kind of people who build and advance technology. There's a different economic question that we keep ignoring - I suppose you could call it planned obsolescence of the human kind, and it doesn't make much sense.
There's a different issue, too. What do you do with the unemployed truck drivers? Autonomous trucks aren't consumers, and neither are truckers without income. This is one of the big problems of automation and the thought that people shouldn't be doing the menial, mundane, or repetitive tasks. How do you pay people to do nothing because their jobs were replaced by machines?