Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#501
#501
There has been rumor that the DOJ will be looking into leaks from some of these Committees. Sessions already has one indictment with more to come. They probably should focus on Adam Schiff and Feinstein first since that is where most of it is coming from.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#502
#502
NorthDallas40 said:
Ummmmm.... yeah? You did call us nuts on the 2nd prosecutor demand?🤪 that’s what I said?
Click to expand...

What was the reason you needed a second special council? Fisa abuse was proven false. Spy in the Trump camp also proven false. The Nunesburger. What reason do you have for a second special council?
 
#504
#504
Mick said:
What was the reason you needed a second special council? Fisa abuse was proven false. Spy in the Trump camp also proven false. The Nunesburger. What reason do you have for a second special council?
Click to expand...

Take it up with Congress. They’re the ones that made the demand.

And now they’re being threatened for calling DAG out for not doing his damn job RE doc requests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#505
#505
NorthDallas40 said:
Take it up with Congress. They’re the ones that made the demand.

And now they’re being threatened for calling DAG out for not doing his damn job RE doc requests.
Click to expand...

Oh, the emails and communications that would be uncovered. The gang of 8 seem to think the best thing to do is let the Mueller investigation play out without the investigation of the investigators during a high level investigation. They are not calling for a second council, Just the Trump pawns.
 
#506
#506
Its Tuesday Rosenstein don't seem worried.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has given the Justice Department until Tuesday to provide access to documents concerning the FBI's alleged informant looking into any Russian ties to President Trump's 2016 campaign.

In a letter sent Friday to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Nunes said the records should be provided to all committee members "and designated staff" rather than just the so-called "Gang of Eight" -- which refers to Republican and Democratic leaders in both houses of Congress as well as top lawmakers from the intelligence panels.

Nunes sets deadline for DOJ to provide documents on alleged FBI informant, claiming 'obstruction' | Fox News



Thursday is coming up.
 
Last edited:
#509
#509
Mick said:
What was the reason you needed a second special council? Fisa abuse was proven false. Spy in the Trump camp also proven false. The Nunesburger. What reason do you have for a second special council?
Click to expand...

proven false?

The DOJ IG is currently investigating it. Have you seen his report on the matter? I haven't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#511
#511
volinbham said:
proven false?

The DOJ IG is currently investigating it. Have you seen his report on the matter? I haven't.
Click to expand...

You do know the OIG report is due out Thursday. The only thing that has even been hinted at is impropriety of the Hillary investigation. Obviously not.
 
#513
#513
Mick said:
You do know the OIG report is due out Thursday. The only thing that has even been hinted at is impropriety of the Hillary investigation. Obviously not.
Click to expand...

LOL. That report is about the Hillary investigation. He is still conducting (hence no report yet) on the FISA stuff.

Obviously you are just making crap up.

Announced end of March
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/380708-doj-watchdog-launches-probe-into-alleged-fisa-abuse


Underway as of June 1
As Justice Dept. inspector general moves from Clinton email to Russia and Trump, he risks becoming a political weapon - The Washington Post
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#515
#515
volinbham said:
LOL. That report is about the Hillary investigation. He is still conducting (hence no report yet) on the FISA stuff.

Obviously you are just making crap up.

Announced end of March
DOJ watchdog launches probe into alleged FISA abuse | TheHill


Underway as of June 1
As Justice Dept. inspector general moves from Clinton email to Russia and Trump, he risks becoming a political weapon - The Washington Post
Click to expand...

Are you saying that we need a second special council to investigate the investigators because Horowitz is incompetent of doing so? That is the point of discussion when you started replying. Rosenstein's not worried. neither am I. Right now all that hints at such FISA abuse is the Nunesburger memo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#516
#516
Mick said:
Are you saying that we need a second special council to investigate the investigators because Horowitz is incompetent of doing so? That is the point of discussion when you started replying. Rosenstein's not worried. neither am I. Right now all that hints at such FISA abuse is the Nunesburger memo.
Click to expand...

WTH are you talking about?

You said the FISA abuse had been proven false. That simply isn't true as it is currently being investigated with no conclusions yet.

Can you show me some investigation that has proven it false?

I'm challenging your assertion.

You didn't even know Horowitz was looking in to it. He's not doing it to placate Nunes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#517
#517
volinbham said:
WTH are you talking about?

You said the FISA abuse had been proven false. That simply isn't true as it is currently being investigated with no conclusions yet.

Can you show me some investigation that has proven it false?

I'm challenging your assertion.
Click to expand...

Have you see anything that validates Fisa abuse? You of all people that keeps saying "collusion has been proven false" and "obstruction has been proven false" have no room for such claims.
 
#518
#518
volinbham said:
WTH are you talking about?

You said the FISA abuse had been proven false. That simply isn't true as it is currently being investigated with no conclusions yet.

Can you show me some investigation that has proven it false?

I'm challenging your assertion.

You didn't even know Horowitz was looking in to it. He's not doing it to placate Nunes.
Click to expand...

His sole job is to investigate the investigators and just because he is investigating them does not mean there are anything to the fisa abuse allegations by Trump and Nunes. I appreciate the link though.
 
#519
#519
Mick said:
His sole job is to investigate the investigators and just because he is investigating them does not mean there are anything to the fisa abuse allegations by Trump and Nunes. I appreciate the link though.
Click to expand...

More funnies...

Read what you just wrote..
 
#520
#520
volinbham said:
WTH are you talking about?

You said the FISA abuse had been proven false. That simply isn't true as it is currently being investigated with no conclusions yet.

Can you show me some investigation that has proven it false?

I'm challenging your assertion.

You didn't even know Horowitz was looking in to it. He's not doing it to placate Nunes.
Click to expand...

Give Mickey a break, he gets his talking points from Wolfy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#521
#521
Mick said:
Have you see anything that validates Fisa abuse? You of all people that keeps saying "collusion has been proven false" and "obstruction has been proven false" have no room for such claims.
Click to expand...

Mick said:
His sole job is to investigate the investigators and just because he is investigating them does not mean there are anything to the fisa abuse allegations by Trump and Nunes.
Click to expand...

Hilarious.

On the first paragraph. I have never said collusion has been proven false. I have said the collusion accusation is not coming to fruition and the evidence is lacking. I repeat I've never made the definitive claim that the collusion accusation has been proven false. To the contrary, I've repeatedly said we'll shall see what the investigation finds.

As to seeing something that validates FISA abuse we do know that McCabe testified the FISA application would not have been obtained without the use of the Steele dossier.

To the second paragraph, Horowitz is investigating because there is enough information to make it worthy of investigating. That validates there is enough to merit looking into it.

Notice I haven't claimed that abuse did occur. I've simply said it is being investigated.

You however specifically said it has been proven false. That is not at all true and you cannot point to any information supporting your claim.

Make a statement of fact; back it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#524
#524
volinbham said:
Hilarious.

On the first paragraph. I have never said collusion has been proven false. I have said the collusion accusation is not coming to fruition and the evidence is lacking. I repeat I've never made the definitive claim that the collusion accusation has been proven false. To the contrary, I've repeatedly said we'll shall see what the investigation finds.

As to seeing something that validates FISA abuse we do know that McCabe testified the FISA application would not have been obtained without the use of the Steele dossier.

To the second paragraph, Horowitz is investigating because there is enough information to make it worthy of investigating. That validates there is enough to merit looking into it.

Notice I haven't claimed that abuse did occur. I've simply said it is being investigated.

You however specifically said it has been proven false. That is not at all true and you cannot point to any information supporting your claim.

Make a statement of fact; back it up.
Click to expand...

From the link he investigates what Sessions tell him to. If you are not a believer in the fisa abuse, why are you so hostile? Don't see you being that way with the one that do say collusion proven false and obstruction proven false. Why is that?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top