AirVol
Let’s go Brandon
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 23,672
- Likes
- 35,255
Knowing the RINOs, you're probably correct. If Trump wants it out, he can declassify the docs. His call I guess.
Do we know what, if anything, Strzok was a sole decision-maker on? I know he made some edits to the Comey no-prosecution letter. But was he doing the interview outlines? Was he taking the interviews? Was he reviewing documents? Was he deciding who to interview and who not to interview? Did he get any leads that he decided not to follow. These are the things I gotta believe the IG looked at in his investigation and none of these turned up anything.
It's a shame that all those innocent people lost their jobs or got demoted at the FBI.Do we know what, if anything, Strzok was a sole decision-maker on? I know he made some edits to the Comey no-prosecution letter. But was he doing the interview outlines? Was he taking the interviews? Was he reviewing documents? Was he deciding who to interview and who not to interview? Did he get any leads that he decided not to follow. These are the things I gotta believe the IG looked at in his investigation and none of these turned up anything.
First reports are coming in. As predicted, looks like a nothing burger.
Republicans grill FBI's anti-Trump texter during 'feisty' interview - POLITICO
...
Republican Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), one of the more vocal critics of Strzok, saw things differently. Such private messages, he said, would normally show the intent more so than public messages.
So after three hours of questioning, no one appeared to have budged. Republicans remained concerned that Strzok had undermined the probes and Democrats remained dismissive about the theory.
"None of my concerns about political bias have been alleviated based on what I heard so far," Meadows said.
"I believe he can be an effective investigator for this nation," countered Jackson Lee.
First reports are coming in. As predicted, looks like a nothing burger.
Republicans grill FBI's anti-Trump texter during 'feisty' interview - POLITICO
"I believe he can be an effective investigator for this nation," countered Jackson Lee.
Strzok defended his messages as "intimate" conversations with an "intimate friend," according to those in the room.
Well hell thats that! Why didnt he just tell us that in the first place! We could have avoided all this then. Plus Shelia Jackson Lee vouched for the explanation too! Glad we got this all settled.
....
🙄 this is a waste of time. Throw his ass out of the building and fire him now.
...
Freedom Caucus & Judiciary Committee member, Matt Gaetz (R-FL) attended todays deposition and reacted to Strzoks testimony, telling the Sean Hannity Radio Show, I am shocked at the lack of curiosity with Robert Mueller. I mean Sean, if you were in Muellers shoes, and you had found these text messages, I would think that you would want to ask whether or not they impact the investigative decisions that were made, whether there was bias, whether there was contact with other members of the FBI regarding the investigation and where it was going and who was making the critical judgment calls, the Florida Congressman said. I just cannot believe the lack of curiosity on the part of Robert Mueller. It was the strongest reaction I had today from Peter Strzoks testimony.
Freedom Caucus member, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL)-who was also in attendance- told SaraACarter.com, It was a wasteStrzok is full of it and he kept hiding behind [the] classified information excuse.
...
Evidently, strzok acquitted himself well today. Dems calling for the release of the transcript.