Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#726
#726
TennTom said:
Every one of the intelligence heads that Trump appointed disagrees with him and firmly believe that Russia was responsible. Who are you going to believe, them or the guy who has told approximately 4000 lies since he descended the escalator and likely has kompramat being used against him?
Click to expand...

Responsible for what in reference to the above tweets?
 
#727
#727
TennTom said:
Every one of the intelligence heads that Trump appointed disagrees with him and firmly believe that Russia was responsible. Who are you going to believe, them or the guy who has told approximately 4000 lies since he descended the escalator and likely has kompramat being used against him?
Click to expand...

That is absolutely not true. Just wait.
 
#729
#729
511b59383387b54f596b013a84029bf7d177c55eb324e8b1d448b24d56adda02.jpg


70e8ec6b60d2015f996fc56377bc8d062c07a121ad88d42130344fc6715ed3cd.png
 
#733
#733
SpaceCoastVol said:
I don't think there were many people that didn't want him to win that day. I can't imagine how painful it was for him.
Click to expand...
There's no greater pressure in sports than Sunday at the Masters. Especially on the back 9 where he was +5 and essentially lost it. No shame in that. If you're a golfer and you've never been to Augusta for the Masters, it needs to be on your bucket list. Amazing place.
 
#736
#736
Biopsyman said:
Watching Norman’s collapse at the masters was painful
Click to expand...

I was there the first 2 rounds, my sister and BIL were there the last 2 rounds. She won the coin toss, I still hate her for that and thanks for reminding me of that painful memory.
 
#737
#737
TennTom said:
Every one of the intelligence heads that Trump appointed disagrees with him and firmly believe that Russia was responsible. Who are you going to believe, them or the guy who has told approximately 4000 lies since he descended the escalator and likely has kompramat being used against him?
Click to expand...

Link?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#739
#739
#740
#740
NorthDallas40 said:
Strzok’s (finally could cheat and had a post to copy from!) credibility is lower today than it was yesterday morning before he opened his damn mouth. He better hope he has his years and points because I’ll bet he’s done. “A lack of candor” would sum up the view of his interview.
Click to expand...

Where are you getting this from? Dems want to release the transcript.
 
#742
#742
NorthDallas40 said:
I know they do. You presume his testimony was factual and stands as he said it. I do not. He stated he wouldn’t take the 5th and he continually deflected on answering.
Click to expand...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't he there with FBI counsel, as opposed to his own private counsel? So if he's not answering a question based on the advice of FBI counsel, it's for reasons internal to the FBI, not his individual right against self-incrimination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#743
#743
evillawyer said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't he there with FBI counsel, as opposed to his own private counsel? So if he's not answering a question based on the advice of FBI counsel, it's for reasons internal to the FBI, not his individual right against self-incrimination.
Click to expand...

Yes he was there with FBI counsel! And I posit that his right against self incrimination and internal reasons of the FBI are one and the same!

One of the few answers he gave. The Page texts mean nothing. It was just “intimate text beteeen intimate friends”.🙄 I haven’t heard any mention of the “insurance policy” in anything that’s come out yet. Guessing counsel would have deferred on that one too though.

No I can’t prove any of that. The summary is you’re inclined to take his testimony at face value. I am not as I believe him to be a liar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#744
#744
NorthDallas40 said:
Yes he was there with FBI counsel! And I posit that his right against self incrimination and internal reasons of the FBI are one and the same!

One of the few answers he gave. The Page texts mean nothing. It was just “intimate text beteeen intimate friends”.🙄 I haven’t heard any mention of the “insurance policy” in anything that’s come out yet. Guessing counsel would have deferred on that one too though.

No I can’t prove any of that. The summary is you’re inclined to take his testimony at face value. I am not as I believe him to be a liar.
Click to expand...

You're the type we try to keep off juries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#748
#748
House passes measure demanding DOJ documents

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/394604-house-passes-measure-demanding-doj-documents

...

The House on Thursday passed a resolution demanding the Department of Justice (DOJ) hand over sensitive documents, in the process delivering a final warning shot to senior officials before conservatives move ahead with more aggressive action against the department.

In a 226-183 vote, lawmakers approved the messaging measure, which calls on the DOJ to turn over all of the documents House Republicans have requested related to the FBI's handling of investigations during the 2016 presidential election.

...

While the resolution is not enforceable, Republicans say they wanted to send a clear message to the DOJ and are vowing to impeach or hold senior officials in contempt of Congress if they don’t comply with their document request.

The vote comes the same day that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray are testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee, where Republicans are expected to grill the senior officials.

...

Ryan earlier this week did not take contempt off of the table, but told reporters that he expects all of the requests to be honored “very, very soon.”

“We do expect full compliance very, very soon, and if we do not get that then we will keep every single option available to us,” he said.

...
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#749
#749
evillawyer said:
But I guess Strzok can't?
Click to expand...

I’ll tell you what. If I had as strong a bias against an individual as his texts claim I would question my own objectivity as well as make that clear on any assignment where I felt it might impact it. We also routinely go thru conflict of interest training.

Based on what I’ve seen thus far I’m 100% convinced he did not manage his own conflicts with his assignments. There’s enough information available that I really don’t see a need to debate it anymore.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top