Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#755
#755
evillawyer said:
I don't think he likes being verbally harangued by a bunch of blabbering idiots hitting him with the latest unsubstantiated conspiracy theories they read about on the Daily Caller.
Click to expand...

The Russian thing is your conspiracy, and you’ve believed every word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#756
#756
AirVol said:
I have a gut feeling evillawyer looks just like him. Like a worm.
Click to expand...

EL thinks & sounds like he has all the right answers for someone that doesn't know anymore than the average joe standing on the street corner waiting for the bus to take them home.
 
Last edited:
#757
#757
AirVol said:
The Russian thing is your conspiracy, and you’ve believed every word.
Click to expand...

I think I've said numerous times I'm taking a wait and see approach on Russia and I'll accept whatever Mueller concludes. There's lots of smoke, and I've certainly made (obvious) jokes about it, but I don't think in my more serious moments that I've ever claimed there's definitive proof of collusion or a smoking gun. I do think there's proof of an openness to collusion (Don Jr. meeting; Trump publicly encouraging hacking). Certainly pro Russia actions were taken (policy change or Ukraine at the convention) and Manafort, undeniably, owed money to people associated with the Kremlin. However, the quid pro quo is as of yet not established.
 
#758
#758
evillawyer said:
I think I've said numerous times I'm taking a wait and see approach on Russia and I'll accept whatever Mueller concludes. There's lots of smoke, and I've certainly made (obvious) jokes about it, but I don't think in my more serious moments that I've ever claimed there's definitive proof of collusion or a smoking gun. I do think there's proof of an openness to collusion (Don Jr. meeting; Trump publicly encouraging hacking). Certainly pro Russia actions were taken (policy change or Ukraine at the convention) and Manafort, undeniably, owed money to people associated with the Kremlin. However, the quid pro quo is as of yet not established.
Click to expand...

Mueller is only required by law to deliver a confidential report to Rosenstein, who oversees the investigation. And Rosenstein has no obligation to send the report to Congress or tell the public about it. Which means much of what Mueller uncovers may remain a secret. So we the public may never know and the lefties will be disappointed. Question is, will you accept that?
 
#759
#759
AirVol said:
Mueller is only required by law to deliver a confidential report to Rosenstein, who oversees the investigation. And Rosenstein has no obligation to send the report to Congress or tell the public about it. Which means much of what Mueller uncovers may remain a secret. So we the public may never know and the lefties will be disappointed. Question is, will you accept that?
Click to expand...

Picture this: Mueller or Rosenstein standing over a mountain of files in front of Trump when he returns from a golf outing and says "Are you going to go quietly?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#760
#760
AirVol said:
Mueller is only required by law to deliver a confidential report to Rosenstein, who oversees the investigation. And Rosenstein has no obligation to send the report to Congress or tell the public about it. Which means much of what Mueller uncovers may remain a secret. So we the public may never know and the lefties will be disappointed. Question is, will you accept that?
Click to expand...

True, but given the public interest, we'll probably at least get a large chunk of the Mueller report ... so we can better understand the impeachment proceedings and subsequent Trump prosecution.
 
#767
#767
I love how Trey Gowdy throws a hissy fit about the Mueller probe having taken a year, when his own pet Benghazi investigation--a wee bit more circumscribed in terms of events and players--took 2.5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#769
#769
So at the end of the day we have Republican party elected politicians screaming at Republican appointed officials because they aren't being Republican enough.

It's a crazy world.
 
#770
#770
TennTom said:
There's no greater pressure in sports than Sunday at the Masters. Especially on the back 9 where he was +5 and essentially lost it. No shame in that. If you're a golfer and you've never been to Augusta for the Masters, it needs to be on your bucket list. Amazing place.
Click to expand...

Mark it down. TennTom and I can agree on this...along with being Vols.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#771
#771
lawgator1 said:
So at the end of the day we have Republican party elected politicians screaming at Republican appointed officials because they aren't being Republican enough.

It's a crazy world.
Click to expand...

You're such a partisan hack. It's embarrassing.

Corruption isn't an issue based on political party.

If Rosenstein is corrupt and/or refuses to cooperate with congress then he should be impeached.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#773
#773
ajvol01 said:
You're such a partisan hack. It's embarrassing.

Corruption isn't an issue based on political party.

If Rosenstein is corrupt and/or refuses to cooperate with congress then he should be impeached.
Click to expand...

Yep. There is so much he is covering up IMO. Trump needs to declassify the docs. The DOJ will never release the ones that matter unless RR is fired and a good DAG replaces him.
 
#774
#774
ajvol01 said:
You're such a partisan hack. It's embarrassing.

Corruption isn't an issue based on political party.

If Rosenstein is corrupt and/or refuses to cooperate with congress then he should be impeached.
Click to expand...


Ooooooorrrrrrrr...... if asshats like Jordan have forsaken their oaths and make fools of themselves, and get laughed at in the process, maybe impeach Jordan?
 
#775
#775
lawgator1 said:
Ooooooorrrrrrrr...... if asshats like Jordan have forsaken their oaths and make fools of themselves, and get laughed at in the process, maybe impeach Jordan?
Click to expand...

What did Jordan do that anyone wouldn’t do in a court of law? Did he offend you?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top