Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#776
#776
AirVol said:
What did Jordan do that anyone wouldn’t do in a court of law? Did he offend you?
Click to expand...

Offend, no. Provide some awesome humor, yes. You could see Rosenstein just thinking to himself Jordan is out of his league and has no idea what he's talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#777
#777
Not a Kristol fan, but he perfectly nailed Jordan.



3a88bd9e-2d2b-4ca6-8172-205c78e0947c.png
 
#778
#778
TennTom said:
Not a Kristol fan, but he perfectly nailed Jordan.



3a88bd9e-2d2b-4ca6-8172-205c78e0947c.png
Click to expand...


Exactly.

The TRULY patriotic Republicans in that room were Rosenstein and Wray. Let Mueller finish, then you can have all the docs you want. Until then, no, you cannot have docs on the criminal investigation into Trump because its ongoing. That's basic procedure.

But clowns like Jordan are so bent on at least looking like they are helping Trump that they are willing to undermine public confidence in the process and the investigation. Its shameful.

History will judge the likes of Nunes and Jordan as traitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#780
#780
Mick said:
Picture this: Mueller or Rosenstein standing over a mountain of files in front of Trump when he returns from a golf outing and says "Are you going to go quietly?"
Click to expand...

You have weird fantasies. Mine mostly consist of hot women I'd never have a shot with in real life, but hey, whatever gets you off. I won't judge.....much.
 
#781
#781
evillawyer said:
I love how Trey Gowdy throws a hissy fit about the Mueller probe having taken a year, when his own pet Benghazi investigation--a wee bit more circumscribed in terms of events and players--took 2.5 years.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because it's not like people died from someone's poor decision making during the Benghazi incident.


Benghazi really happened. No proof of Trump/Russia collusion has been offered up. At some point, shouldn't Mueller provide some kind of evidence that justifies the price tag of his ongoing investigation? He doesn't have to lay out his whole case, just show he's not pursuing a fictitious narrative. All of this BS about him "flipping" people makes me believe he has bupkus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#782
#782
lawgator1 said:
So at the end of the day we have Republican party elected politicians screaming at Republican appointed officials because they aren't being Republican enough.

It's a crazy world.
Click to expand...
Not a problem in the Dimwit world, because ya'll get your marching orders and everybody stays in line. That is one area where I have to hand it to you. Party over truth and country all the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#783
#783
Here's my question on all of this. Rosenstein won't hand over certain documents because they are part of an ongoing criminal investigation. The Senate and House Judiciary committees are made up of people that probably have or can get TS clearances and sign letters of non disclosure that I would bet incur significant penalty if broken. What is the BFD here? Turn over the ****ing documents to the committees as ordered and get this colossal waste of time over with.
 
#789
#789
Rosenstein Couldn't Say He Even Read the FISA Warrant Before Signing It: What It Means

Not good for the FAUX Russia Investigation

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2bvfFVktP4[/youtube]
 
#790
#790
BigOrangeD said:
Rosenstein Couldn't Say He Even Read the FISA Warrant Before Signing It: What It Means

Not good for the FAUX Russia Investigation

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2bvfFVktP4[/youtube]
Click to expand...

He either didn't read it, which I believe, or he can't recall all the details so diverted the questions when asked if he read the FISA he signed. Rosenstein, IMO, ain't a complete straight shooter, although he portrays that hubris...something smells off with this guy, just not sure what that may be with this stonewalling matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#791
#791
Vol0725 said:
He either didn't read it, which I believe, or he can't recall all the details so diverted the questions when asked if he read the FISA he signed. Rosenstein, IMO, ain't a complete straight shooter, although he portrays that hubris...something smells off with this guy, just not sure what that may be with this stonewalling matter.
Click to expand...

Or he recalls everything and did not want to self incriminate.

He's a smarmy liar.
 
#792
#792
Stunning revelation buried deep in IG report blows hole in Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting narrative

Stunning revelation buried deep in IG report blows hole in Lynch-Clinton tarmac meeting narrative | TheBlaze

A stunning revelation buried deep inside Department of Justice inspector general Michael Horowitz’s report on the FBI’s Hillary Clinton email investigation suggests the controversial June 2016 tarmac meeting between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton was coordinated.

If true, it blows a hole in the narrative Lynch and Clinton have maintained for two years. Lynch claimed the “social” meeting was spontaneous and the two discussed grandchildren.

The meeting was extremely controversial at the time because it came just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced the FBI would not recommend criminal charges against Clinton for using a private email server while secretary of state.

...
Click to expand...
 
#796
#796
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah it is isn’t it?! It’s factual proof both Lynch and Clinton lied about the spontaneity of the meeting, that it was in fact arranged it advance! It was June so I wonder what “Midyear” topics they possibly discussed! 🤩
Click to expand...
Y'all got 'em now. LOCK EM UP!! :eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
#800
#800
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/02/nunes-refers-ten-obama-officials-to-house-judiciary-and-oversight-joint-task-force/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Nunes Refers Ten Obama Officials to House Judiciary and Oversight Joint Task Force Nunes Refers Obama Officials to Joint Task Force

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) on Monday referred ten current and former U.S. officials to the House Judiciary and Oversight & Government Reform Committees’ joint task force, as it investigates potential DOJ and FBI wrongdoing related to the Trump-Russia probe.

Nunes, in a letter to the chairmen of both committees obtained by Breitbart News, listed ten current and former U.S. officials who may have received or provided information relevant to their investigation.

The list includes a number of U.S. officials who were working at the U.S. Embassy in London, where the alleged conversation between Australian diplomat Alexander Downer and then-Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos in May 2016 was reported.

Interviews with those officials could reveal whether the FBI lied when it said it began investigating the Trump campaign on July 31, 2016, after it received information from Downer after stolen Democratic National Committee emails were published on July 22, 2016.

Leaks to the New York Times and the Washington Post earlier this year revealed that an FBI and CIA informant, Stefan Halper, reached out to then-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as early as June 2016 — revealing that the FBI may have actually started its investigation of the Trump campaign much earlier than stated.

...

Normally, intelligence passed on from a member of the “Five Eyes” alliance — Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. — to another member comes through an official channel for intelligence sharing.

However, Nunes, upon reviewing the document that formally launched the FBI’s investigation, said there was no intelligence shared through that official channel, meaning that the intelligence was shared through unofficial means.

...
Click to expand...

This all keeps popping back up. I think it must be pretty important in the overall scheme of things.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top