85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,007
- Likes
- 62,767
We're still less efficient and much is on purpose. We have some of the slowest in the world. Unions fight automation, more work hours, wages, etc. A guy making $250k in the US driving a crane has zero incentive to speed up and the unions will never ask him toWell no sh!t. Those workers in China get fired (or worse) for not working.
Oh totally agree. Been working in global supply chain for 20 years now.We're still less efficient and much is on purpose. We have some of the slowest in the world. Unions fight automation, more work hours, wages, etc. A guy making $250k in the US driving a crane has zero incentive to speed up and the unions will never ask him to
I did see where Rotterdam increased port efficiency in 2021.We're still less efficient and much is on purpose. We have some of the slowest in the world. Unions fight automation, more work hours, wages, etc. A guy making $250k in the US driving a crane has zero incentive to speed up and the unions will never ask him to
That 50 cents works out to almost $60 million dollars. The need to grow profits is rooted in the need to increase share holder value. The majority of these companies largest shareholders are institutional investors. For example, the largest stock holder of my company, is a north western states teachers union. This means when you shat on companies growing profits, for their share holders, you are really shatting on peoples retirement funds.
And people only invest in these stock index funds if the incentize is in place for the risks - higher returns.
The risk free rate of return is about 5%. Anything less then that you may as well invest in bonds. No risk then put the money in savings and have it insured by the FDIC. No risk and basically no return.
$38M still is laughable but it's all value and competition. A bad CEO can crush the business.
Why don't Sanders ask Nancy how she got super rich or how did Sanders, a career idiot, get several expensive homes?
His salary is just north of a $1 million. The rest was bonuses and incentives. Probably cashed out a ton of stock, and obviously, they grossly outperformed expectations to fatten his bonus.And people only invest in these stock index funds if the incentize is in place for the risks - higher returns.
The risk free rate of return is about 5%. Anything less then that you may as well invest in bonds. No risk then put the money in savings and have it insured by the FDIC. No risk and basically no return.
$38M still is laughable but it's all value and competition. A bad CEO can crush the business.
Why don't Sanders ask Nancy how she got super rich or how did Sanders, a career idiot, get several expensive homes?
We're still less efficient and much is on purpose. We have some of the slowest in the world. Unions fight automation, more work hours, wages, etc. A guy making $250k in the US driving a crane has zero incentive to speed up and the unions will never ask him to
Because they know that consumers know "everything is going up." What a great time to price gouge.This is always the funniest take ever. The left wing idea that inflation is just all the companies deciding to be greedy at once.
Mixed in with the idea that profits are somehow evil.
If this is whatâs going on, why did all the corporations become magically more greedy this year?
Because they know that consumers know "everything is going up." What a great time to price gouge.
Because they know that consumers know "everything is going up." What a great time to price gouge.
While I wouldnât use the term gouging, this is a true statement. Everyone is trying to pass through price increases in this environment, and itâs not always dollar for dollar. Producers are taking advantage while they can. I cannot say with certainty that is specifically the case with Chipotle, but it wouldnât surprise me.
What Bernie gets wrong is he thinks itâs a problem for the government to fix, primarily by punishing âgreedyâ corporations with a higher tax rate.
However, the example he uses to demonstrate what he thinks is corporate greed makes his stance on corporate tax rates invalid. If they are managing to pass through all their inflation and then some, does he think a higher tax rate wonât also get passed on to the consumer? It always does.
"Joe is crushing it," eh?
Blaming Joe Biden for the current rise of inflation, is either being intellectually dishonest, as many Republicans in Congress are, or it is being ignorant of the fiscal calendar. I could see it being either one of those with you. I have seen dishonesty, partisanship and ignorance on full display in equal share from your posts.
Once again... obviously, the Biden administration is about to make the problem of inflation much worse, but you are ignorant if you don't understand how appropriations bills which were signed into law while Donald Trump was President, are mostly responsible for this increase in inflation that we are currently seeing in 2021. Regardless of who won the 2020 Presidential Election, inflation was going to be on the rise right now. That has been evident since the fall of 2019, which was before the COVID-19 pandemic even began.
So, I will direct this question one more time towards the party of hypocrites, who only pretend to care about inflation and being fiscally responsible, when a Democrat is President :
QUESTION :
Where was this outrage over President Donald Trump's budget proposals, and the over-sized spending packages which he signed into law?
ANSWER :
There was NONE ... because it's not something you truly care about, unless you think you can use it as a weapon to attack a Democratic Party President with.
Thereâs two important things here as I see it.
1. Bernie intentionally misleads people into believing their âprofitsâ (which he uses as a pejorative) were due to âprice gougingâ without addressing the simple reality that their prices have not tripled or even doubled for that matter. So heâs obviously misrepresenting how they made an extra 181% if prices likely rose 10% (idk their exact menu price changes).
2. The obvious answer here is they sold more product. The obvious question is how and itâs the one Bernie doesnât want you to ask because he knows the answer youâll come up with is that Bernie and friends killed about 50% of the restaurant industry with their policies
He knows his audience is dumb enough to just see the words âprofitâ, âprice gougingâ, and a ceo getting a raise and be triggered without asking âhowâ