thebjd
Mythodical Validvictorian
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 9,869
- Likes
- 2,359
I'm not moving any goal posts, but if the Peyton sunshine pumpers get to parade around using the more with less excuse, Brady gets to use it now. And regardless of how this season shakes out, Brady will still have more rings come March. There are arguments made for both qbs that are very, very good as far as GOAT. I still put Joe Montana there personally, but if I had to take either Brady or Manning for one must win game, I'm picking Brady.
inb4 someone claims I'm not a V4L.
No, you are not a VFL at best you are a NEGA VFL but my bet is on a little trolling going on. The above statement you made ranks right up there (top 10%) of the dumbest posts on this site. For example, Super Bowl wins is not the only meausre you rank the quallity of a QB ... how stupid along with your "sunshine pumper" comment!! :banghead2:
I don't think the next two games decide anything.
If Manning beats the Patriots and wins the Super Bowl, it would certainly be an impressive feat. He would be the first QB to lead two completely different teams with different coaches to a Super Bowl Championship. To my mind, that is more impressive than winning multiple Super Bowls with the same team. But does it erase years of himself and his teams underperforming in the postseason? I don't think so.
If Brady beats the Broncos and wins the Super Bowl, we'll never hear the end of it from the media about how he has as many rings as Montana. And that is pretty impressive. But he still hasn't done anything without Belichick. Before Belichick coached him, he was an above average high school prospect, who was no more than an above average college QB. He has never done anything remarkable without Belichick. I wouldn't call anyone the greatest of all time when pretty much all of their success depends so much on another person.
I keep seeing this "Brady winning with trash" theme which I don't get. In Brady's last 5 games he's 4-1 while completing 59% of his passes while avg 255yds and having 6TD's for 1.2tdpg* (Interestingly the Pats passing ypg for the season was 255.4ypg/1.56tdpg) In 3 of those 5 he didn't even need to throw for more than 200yds. Meanwhile the Pats finished the season top 10 in rushing too. Upshot, regardless of how good Brady might be (and he is) the Pats aren't exactly needing him to go out and be a superstar every game to save their bacon. In fact considering the Pats finished 12-4 with Brady having a passer rating of 87.3 (behind the likes of Matt Ryan and his 4-12 Falcons) I think it's safe to say there was a LOT more to the Pats success this year than just Brady being a monster.
*Over that same span Manning's been at 69%/316/16. (for the season 340/3.44)
If you remove both offensive coaching staffs Peyton doesn't miss a beat. Brady wouldn't be close to what he is without the hoodie's scheme. Peyton should be in the argument for GOAT. Brady isn't in the top 5 IMO
You know bellichek is a defensive guy, right?
The pats change offensive assistants more often than the kardashians change husbands.
His passing targets are edelman and amendola.
His rbs are journeymen or a bunch of who dats.
He is working with a bunch of scrubs.
The defense is playing without mayo and wilfork. They dont have the ty law, assante samuel shut down corner anymore.
Its a top 5 draft pick team without brady and/or bellichek
His passing targets are edelman and amendola.
His rbs are journeymen or a bunch of who dats.
He is working with a bunch of scrubs.
The defense is playing without mayo and wilfork. They dont have the ty law, assante samuel shut down corner anymore.
Its a top 5 draft pick team without brady and/or bellichek
Noticed people are talking about a possibility Peyton might not be able to return next year. If this is the case, would either QB winning the SB this year and beating the other this week put him ahead of the other?