COVID Relief Package

#128
#128
LouderVol said:
If a mansion is 1.3 million and you buy it for 600k how much did you save?

Dont forget you are 27.2 million already I debt.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you agree with 40 Republicans in the Senate and 100% of Republicans in the House. What's your point? Not a single Republican has voted for this. There were ten Republicans who knocked on Biden's door to ask if a compromise was possible and the answer they got was hell no. This will pass w/o a single GOP vote. Again, what's your point? It sure seems like one party is fiscally responsible here and the other isn't. There is a stark political divide over this
 
#129
#129
It would be nice if the Government would work as it should for once. If the argument for passing a relief package is that there are certain urgent needs then the package should be limited to that. When you throw in other items (particularly ones that could be detrimental like the minimum wage) it undermines the argument.

Giving everyone making up to 120,000 (couple) money regardless of their need and everyone with a child making up to 150000 (couple) 3000-3600/child regardless of need is just nuts.

Add to that the massive amount from the last stimulus that hasn't been spent and it's hard to see this as anything but opportunistic.

There are some targeted needs that could be addressed without the massive scale and political agenda.
 
#133
#133
utvolpj said:
Trump redistributed $2.2T and you still voted for him again. Are we still pretending the other side are the socialists?
Click to expand...

Trump is old news. He's long gone. We now have a party wanting to spend $1.9T and another who wants to vote against it
 
#134
#134
utvolpj said:
Trump redistributed $2.2T and you still voted for him again. Are we still pretending the other side are the socialists?
Click to expand...

😂

Tasty facts are tasty.

Let's see what kind of mental gymnastics they can come up with to deflect from this.
 
#136
#136
Sea Ray said:
Trump is old news. He's long gone. We now have a party wanting to spend $1.9T and another who wants to vote against it
Click to expand...

Both Trump and Biden are tax and spend sh*t heads; different sides of the same socialist coin.

Say it with me, I know you can do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#137
#137
This post being a perfect example of what I mean when I say that the GOP lies and claims it is fiscally conservative.
 
#138
#138
Sea Ray said:
Trump is old news. He's long gone. We now have a party wanting to spend $1.9T and another who wants to vote against it
Click to expand...
yeah the older need of 3 weeks. Never mind that Trump wanted a bigger one if reelected

They don't want to vote against it and we're a little past putting the toothpaste back in the tube. They only want to appear to be against it for political reasons. This is about control and paying back favors. If this was truly about money the first and second relief bills would have never passed and been signed
 
#140
#140
Septic said:
Both Trump and Biden are tax and spend sh*t heads; different sides of the same socialist coin.

Say it with me, I know you can do it.
Click to expand...
I have no argument. Trump is not in power anymore.

The leftists have all three houses. What are they gonna do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sea Ray
#142
#142
utvolpj said:
3 houses?

Anyway, they'll likely do what Trump did when he had them - spend lots of money we don't have and run up the debt
Click to expand...

You know what I mean.

And Trump isn't in power anymore. Neither are the Republicans anymore. Full control belongs to the Socialists. More gender studies for Pakistan?
 
#143
#143
Actually Septic, I am having difficulty trying to navigate a response to a post. My first time. I meant to reply to Lawgater when he/she posted that neither party was "fiscally conservative." My reply is that no party is fiscally responsible except one's self.
 
#144
#144
SpaceCoastVol said:
You know what I mean.

And Trump isn't in power anymore. Neither are the Republicans anymore. Full control belongs to the Socialists. More gender studies for Pakistan?
Click to expand...
He's not in power but his spending will have lasting effects that should be discussed. So should the fact that the fiscal conservatives recently poked their heads out, saw no shadow and decided it was safe to be against spending again.

You spent years talking about Obama yet won't discuss your guy for even 3 weeks? That's pretty cowardly
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill and LouderVol
#145
#145
Juanita said:
Actually Septic, I am having difficulty trying to navigate a response to a post. My first time. I meant to reply to Lawgater when he/she posted that neither party was "fiscally conservative." My reply is that no party is fiscally responsible except one's self.
Click to expand...
If you are on mobile there is a "reply" button underneath the post. Bottom right on my browser. It will pull up the post and let you respond in this manner.

You can also "@" someone by using that symbol and typing their name right behind it, and it will notify them if you dont have a post to reply to.
 
#147
#147
utvolpj said:
He's not in power but his spending will have lasting effects that should be discussed. So should the fact that the fiscal conservatives recently poked their heads out, saw no shadow and decided it was safe to be against spending again.

You spent years talking about Obama yet won't discuss your guy for even 3 weeks? That's pretty cowardly
Click to expand...
"My guy" did wonderful things for this country. We were on a great path until the Chinese attacked us. You can roll the 'national emergency' of the pandemic into this and blame him for that, but I personally feel that is disingenuous, and in a way, cowardly in and of itself. Obama was a total loser policy wise, but even HE says that Xiden has been on the wrong side of EVERY foreign policy issue placed in front of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GSD82
#148
#148
SpaceCoastVol said:
"My guy" did wonderful things for this country. We were on a great path until the Chinese attacked us. You can roll the 'national emergency' of the pandemic into this and blame him for that, but I personally feel that is disingenuous, and in a way, cowardly in and of itself. Obama was a total loser policy wise, but even HE says that Xiden has been on the wrong side of EVERY foreign policy issue placed in front of him.
Click to expand...
To quote your previous statement

Lol
 
#149
#149
SpaceCoastVol said:
"My guy" did wonderful things for this country. We were on a great path until the Chinese attacked us. You can roll the 'national emergency' of the pandemic into this and blame him for that, but I personally feel that is disingenuous, and in a way, cowardly in and of itself. Obama was a total loser policy wise, but even HE says that Xiden has been on the wrong side of EVERY foreign policy issue placed in front of him.
Click to expand...
And his response was terrible. It's his job to respond to those events and make the best of them. Trump didnt.
 
#150
#150
LouderVol said:
And his response was terrible. It's his job to respond to those events and make the best of them. Trump didnt.
Click to expand...
Perhaps. When you have to battle dolts like Newsome and Cuomo, it doesn't help. Seems I read something about unused hospital ships and temporary hospitals in NY. Yet the case/death rate there...

But yeah... Trump's fault.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top