Critical race theory and elections

$40,000-a-year Chicago private school boasted of injecting critical race theory into PHYSICS classes as far back as 2016 – and revealed that students' reactions would be 'tracked'

A $40,000-a-year- private school in Chicago had allegedly injected critical race theory into its physics classes as far back as 2016 and tracked students' attitudes to the courses to see to see if they were successful.

Emails from The Latin School of Chicago obtained by The Federalist, a conservative news outlet, revealed that former director Elizabeth Denevi introduced a new curriculum to ninth grad students called 'Social Justice in Physics' six years ago.

According to one email, which was addressed to parents, the course was meant to 'address power dynamics, systematic racism, white privilege and the shortage of people of color and women in the field of science, especially physics.'

Chicago private school 'injected critical race theory into PHYSICS classes as far back as 2016' | Daily Mail Online
 
Professors Teach Preschoolers to See Color as Childhood Innocence Gets 'Debunked'

7acde5e0-dbfa-4fce-ae33-554c1054d3b2-860x475.jpg


There’s now relief for those concerned about the racism of Asian 4-year-olds.

As reported The College Fix, two secondary-education teachers have been awarded $11,000 to develop a preschool curriculum to teach tykes still eating their boogers not to be raging racists.

The American Educational Research Association (AERA) gave the grant to University of Texas at San Antonio Professor Zhongfeng Tian and Boston College instructor Alisha Nguyen.​
Per a press release, here’s how it will work:
[Zhongfeng and Alisha will] collaborate with teachers and families in two dual language immersion preschools in the Greater Boston Area to design and implement an eight-week antiracist biliteracy program in three classrooms.​
The foreign languages involved: Vietnamese and Mandarin.

It’s a three-fold goal:
 
Last edited:
The left doesn't want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots. In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.

Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology (properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy. CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it's merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they're taught to believe they're recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they're taught to believe they're bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.

Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from. Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual. In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an "oppressor" for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated "oppressed" minority.

At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child's new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child's new identity it's firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage.

The parents' tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry. The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It's not about diddling kids. It's about capturing the minds of impressionable children.

Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.

Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words "mom", "dad", or "parents" in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing "Donuts with Dads" with "Bagels with Buds" or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don't have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)

Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter. These are your kids we're talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It's not a secret agenda.
 
I have three immediate family members in public school education. Have asked each one of them about CRT and all have said they couldn’t even describe it and have never heard it or it’s ideology referenced in the learning environment. They are just teaching music, reading, and civics (respectively) as they have for decades. All are open to members of the public participating in the learning process as well.

CRT sounds like yet another political boogeyman. Conservatives love tearing down education, but I don’t hear much about concerted efforts that train young conservatives to enter the teaching profession. Maybe it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than it is to help build one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
I have three immediate family members in public school education. Have asked each one of them about CRT and all have said they couldn’t even describe it and have never heard it or it’s ideology referenced in the learning environment. They are just teaching music, reading, and civics (respectively) as they have for decades. All are open to members of the public participating in the learning process as well.

CRT sounds like yet another political boogeyman. Conservatives love tearing down education, but I don’t hear much about concerted efforts that train young conservatives to enter the teaching profession. Maybe it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than it is to help build one.
I think its subtlety done...my son brought home a paper about slavery, and it refered to slavery as being done by the "white man". Thats a false claim and by subtlety suggesting that while ignoring that slavery was done worldwide by every race..it singles out and blames 1 race
 
I think its subtlety done...my son brought home a paper about slavery, and it refered to slavery as being done by the "white man". Thats a false claim and by subtlety suggesting that while ignoring that slavery was done worldwide by every race..it singles out and blames 1 race
It depends on the context. If it’s an American history class, then you’re dealing with a true statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dergibvol
"It depends on the context"

False.

Africans sold Africans all over the world.
You’re trying too hard. It does depend on the context. If the curriculum is centered around American history, why would they delve into the ancient history of slavery worldwide? To make the American slave trade seem tame or normal? Come on. That’s like teaching American history and saying “Scandinavian immigrants tended to settle in the American Midwest, now let’s delve into the entire history of Scandinavian people.” It’s tedious, irrelevant, and doesn’t pertain to the curriculum.
 
You’re trying too hard. It does depend on the context. If the curriculum is centered around American history, why would they delve into the ancient history of slavery worldwide? To make the American slave trade seem tame or normal? Come on. That’s like teaching American history and saying “Scandinavian immigrants tended to settle in the American Midwest, now let’s delve into the entire history of Scandinavian people.” It’s tedious, irrelevant, and doesn’t pertain to the curriculum.
You do realize that slavery was STANDARD practice in those days, and is still practiced today...not by white folks but blacks in Africa..
 
I have three immediate family members in public school education. Have asked each one of them about CRT and all have said they couldn’t even describe it and have never heard it or it’s ideology referenced in the learning environment. They are just teaching music, reading, and civics (respectively) as they have for decades. All are open to members of the public participating in the learning process as well.

CRT sounds like yet another political boogeyman. Conservatives love tearing down education, but I don’t hear much about concerted efforts that train young conservatives to enter the teaching profession. Maybe it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than it is to help build one.
It is 100% a political boogeyman. It's just one more in a long line of "issues" overblown by the right to rile their base through hatred and division.
It's been a very successful formula for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40
You’re trying too hard. It does depend on the context. If the curriculum is centered around American history, why would they delve into the ancient history of slavery worldwide? To make the American slave trade seem tame or normal? Come on. That’s like teaching American history and saying “Scandinavian immigrants tended to settle in the American Midwest, now let’s delve into the entire history of Scandinavian people.” It’s tedious, irrelevant, and doesn’t pertain to the curriculum.
Clever word play. Another communist tactic.........

American History.........

My response was mocking your take on history.

You and I agree that Africans sold Africans across the globe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
The left doesn't want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots. In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.

Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology (properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy. CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it's merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they're taught to believe they're recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they're taught to believe they're bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.

Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from. Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual. In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an "oppressor" for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated "oppressed" minority.

At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child's new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child's new identity it's firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage.

The parents' tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry. The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It's not about diddling kids. It's about capturing the minds of impressionable children.

Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.

Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words "mom", "dad", or "parents" in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing "Donuts with Dads" with "Bagels with Buds" or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don't have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)

Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter. These are your kids we're talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It's not a secret agenda.
I could only make it through the first couple of paragraphs but it was shaping up to be the biggest pile of crap I've seen in quite some time.
 
Clever word play. Another communist tactic.........

American History.........

My response was mocking your take on history.

You and I agree that Africans sold Africans across the globe.
Most states don’t require a world history curriculum but every state has an American history requirement, so not only is it not word play, it’s extremely relevant to the discussion.
 
Most states don’t require a world history curriculum but every state has an American history requirement, so not only is it not word play, it’s extremely relevant to the discussion.
Have fun with your nonsense.

Africans sold africans to other countries for many years.

Glad we agree on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
What exactly do you think I am deflecting away from?

The left doesn't want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots. In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.

Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology (properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy. CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it's merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they're taught to believe they're recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they're taught to believe they're bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.

Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from. Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual. In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an "oppressor" for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated "oppressed" minority.

At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child's new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child's new identity it's firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage.

The parents' tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry. The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It's not about diddling kids. It's about capturing the minds of impressionable children.

Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.

Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words "mom", "dad", or "parents" in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing "Donuts with Dads" with "Bagels with Buds" or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don't have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)

Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter. These are your kids we're talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It's not a secret agenda.
 
The left doesn't want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots. In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.

Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology (properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy. CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it's merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they're taught to believe they're recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they're taught to believe they're bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.

Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from. Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual. In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an "oppressor" for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated "oppressed" minority.

At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child's new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child's new identity it's firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage.

The parents' tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry. The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It's not about diddling kids. It's about capturing the minds of impressionable children.

Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.

Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words "mom", "dad", or "parents" in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing "Donuts with Dads" with "Bagels with Buds" or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don't have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)

Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter. These are your kids we're talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It's not a secret agenda.
Oh, never mind then. I'd rather read a Q thread........
 
I have three immediate family members in public school education. Have asked each one of them about CRT and all have said they couldn’t even describe it and have never heard it or it’s ideology referenced in the learning environment. They are just teaching music, reading, and civics (respectively) as they have for decades. All are open to members of the public participating in the learning process as well.

CRT sounds like yet another political boogeyman. Conservatives love tearing down education, but I don’t hear much about concerted efforts that train young conservatives to enter the teaching profession. Maybe it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than it is to help build one.
Ask a fish to describe water and they will say the same thing. You can’t conceive or describe something as “different “ when it is the only world you have ever known. Public education has been indoctrinating kids so long now I have no trouble believing that some of them honestly don’t know they are doing it. And the ones who do see what’s going on are too afraid to speak up about it, especially once you reach the University level
 

VN Store



Back
Top