Critical race theory and elections

Ask a fish to describe water and they will say the same thing. You can’t conceive or describe something as “different “ when it is the only world you have ever known. Public education has been indoctrinating kids so long now I have no trouble believing that some of them honestly don’t know they are doing it. And the ones who do see what’s going on are too afraid to speak up about it, especially once you reach the University level
Throwing rocks again. Most here are great at diatribes about what they think is so wrong, but I hear very little that are solution oriented.

Where are the young conservatives lining up to teach American youth? Oh, that’s right, nobody wants to teach anymore because of the low pay, high stress, education requirements, and endless political damnation from one of the country’s two political parties.

So keep up the handwringing, it’s going to go a long way I’m sure of it.
 
Throwing rocks again. Most here are great at diatribes about what they think is so wrong, but I hear very little that are solution oriented.

Where are the young conservatives lining up to teach American youth? Oh, that’s right, nobody wants to teach anymore because of the low pay, high stress, education requirements, and endless political damnation from one of the country’s two political parties.

So keep up the handwringing, it’s going to go a long way I’m sure of it.
I have taught America’s youth to some degree as associate faculty but thankfully Computer Science is (or at least was) difficult to screw up with ideology (although I do hear lately claims that logic (on which all binary computing is based) Is somehow inherently a manifestation of white supremacy).
But I would love to set up my own school with its own curriculum. It would be a beautiful classically based curriculum with philosophy, rhetoric, and classical literature. The kids would come out with a solid knowledge of everything from Homer and Plato all the way through the end of the Enlightenment and the Great British and Scottish humanists of the 18th Century. Heck, they may even know some Latin to be able to read Caesar’s Commentaries on the Gaulic Campains in the Original language.
They will be spared the neo Marxist claptrap of the post WWII modernists thankfully. Not even a Whif of French Postmodernism or Deconstructionist thought. Dead white European males will once again reclaim their rightful places as the pillars of the Western Canon.
Ah, what a generation of beautiful minds I will turn lose upon the world.
Now are you REALLY sure you wish we conservatives to step into the classroom?
 
I have taught America’s youth to some degree as associate faculty but thankfully Computer Science is (or at least was) difficult to screw up with ideology (although I do hear lately claims that logic (on which all binary computing is based) Is somehow inherently a manifestation of white supremacy).
But I would love to set up my own school with its own curriculum. It would be a beautiful classically based curriculum with philosophy, rhetoric, and classical literature. The kids would come out with a solid knowledge of everything from Homer and Plato all the way through the end of the Enlightenment and the Great British and Scottish humanists of the 18th Century. Heck, they may even know some Latin to be able to read Caesar’s Commentaries on the Gaulic Campains in the Original language.
They will be spared the neo Marxist claptrap of the post WWII modernists thankfully. Not even a Whif of French Postmodernism or Deconstructionist thought. Dead white European males will once again reclaim their rightful places as the pillars of the Western Canon.
Ah, what a generation of beautiful minds I will turn lose upon the world.
Now are you REALLY sure you wish we conservatives to step into the classroom?
Quite the fantasy. A lot of imagination wasted. Looking forward to the next conservative push for cameras in every classroom because, well, that’s the company you keep and the depth of current Republican problem-solving.
 
Quite the fantasy. A lot of imagination wasted. Looking forward to the next conservative push for cameras in every classroom because, well, that’s the company you keep and the depth of current Republican problem-solving.
I would have absolutely zero reservations about a camera recording my teaching. I would welcome it. I could teach the viewers just as easily that way.
 
I would have absolutely zero reservations about a camera recording my teaching. I would welcome it. I could teach the viewers just as easily that way.
It’s my understanding that most educators welcome it as well, no matter how impractical and foolish that might be.
 
I would have absolutely zero reservations about a camera recording my teaching. I would welcome it. I could teach the viewers just as easily that way.
To expand on this thought, this open letter is from an Iowa Teacher addressed to FOX News host, Tucker Carlson. I found it very interesting.

“Dear Tucker Carlson,

Hey Tuck, I just finished watching a segment of your show. You know, the one where you suggest that there should be a camera in every classroom in order to root out… let me get this accurate…”civilization ending poison.”
https://twitter.com/ndrew.../status/1412566208763895810

I’m going to zig where you thought most teachers would zag. I welcome your Orwellian cameras in my classroom. Frankly, I don’t know many teachers who would object to having people watch what we do. As a matter of fact, I hate to tell you this Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson, but most of us spent the last year having video cameras in our classrooms.

See, I think you believe that your suggestion that people see what happens in our classrooms will somehow scare teachers. The truth of it is that we have been begging for years to have people, such as yourself, come into our classrooms.

I somewhat famously asked Ms. DeVos to visit a public school before she became Secretary of Education (https://www.huffpost.com/.../an-introduction-from-public...). It’s unclear whether she has yet to set foot in an actual public school classroom, but I digress.

I sense that you think you’ll see all of us pinko teachers speaking endlessly about Critical Race Theory leading to…
and again, let me get this right, “civilization ending poison.”

I’ve been in a lot of classrooms (more than you I am willing to bet) and think you’re going to be disappointed on that front. What happens in America’s classrooms is teaching and learning.

Your “spy cameras” will see teachers and students working together to be better every day. I’ll tell you what I saw on a tour of classrooms not that long ago.

I saw a group of kindergartners trying to create bridges over running water with basic classroom supplies in a lesson about collaboration. I saw a high school literature class talking about the character development in The Glass Menagerie. I saw a middle school history class participating in group project where they had to solve problems in a fictional city, with specifics of how they would utilize resources and build public support for their projects.

Anyone watching your cameras will see learning…
all day every day. For those who watch your “nanny cams” carefully, they’ll see a lot of other things as well. They will see teachers working with students who have vastly different life experiences.

They will see students who are fluent in multiple languages working with teachers to become proficient in yet one more language. They will see students who are hungry get their one solid meal a day in the cafeteria. They will see students itching for more fine arts, industrial technology, or world languages to be offered in their school. In my classroom, if we’re being honest, they’ll probably hear some sketchy intonation from my saxophones, and I promise we’re working on it. But for sure, they will see learning… all day every day.

To be honest, I’m fascinated by the logistics of your proposal. In a world where school districts are struggling to recruit and maintain teachers, who is going to man your “citizen review boards” (setting aside the fact that public school teachers already answer to publicly elected school boards)?

For instance, in my school district I sense you would need well over 500 cameras going every day. Who watches those 500 screens 10 hours a day (I want you watching my 7 am jazz band and my after school lessons)?

What qualifications would these “experts” need to know what they were watching for? What happens when they catch a teacher teaching… let me get this right… ”civilization ending poison?” Who do they report that to? I’m also curious who will pay for all of this incredible technology.

Maybe I missed it, but can you point me to a K-12 institution where Critical Race Theory is being taught? Hell, can you define Critical Race Theory for all of us? I’m sure you’ve got answers to all of these questions.

Frankly, I’ve never been able to figure out, instead of dreaming up Orwellian plans to have Big Brother in all of our classrooms, why you don’t round up an army of bright young conservatives to actually step up and teach?

Is it because teachers work hard, aren’t paid as much as those with similar educational backgrounds, don’t have support from our elected officials, constantly serve as punching bags for those who don’t understand public education, or is it just because it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than to build one?

Here’s the real deal Tuck, I grew up with my mom making me eat your family’s Salisbury Steaks once every couple of weeks (his family makes Swanson TV dinners) for many years. I struggle to take advice on teaching and learning from a guy who makes a steak that, on its best day, tastes like shoe leather that has been left out in a goat pasture for a few weeks.

I get that Critical Race Theory is your latest attempt to scare your easily manipulated demographic, but let’s just admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

With all of that being said, count me on the cameras Tucky. Like many teachers, I’m in the early stages of understanding Critical Race Theory (most of us hadn’t heard about it until you and your people started crying about it), but if you find me teaching it, have one of the Tucker Youth watching your surveillance devices let me know.

If Critical Race Theory involves talking honestly about American history, I’m probably doing that sometimes. I spent much of the last six years advocating for a way for teaching to become more transparent, and in the dumbest way possible, you are joining that crusade. Let’s make this happen TV Dinner Boy.

Sincerely,
Patrick J. Kearney
Actual Teacher”

(Copied from Kim Larkin-Floria)
 
To expand on this thought, this open letter is from an Iowa Teacher addressed to FOX News host, Tucker Carlson. I found it very interesting.

“Dear Tucker Carlson,

Hey Tuck, I just finished watching a segment of your show. You know, the one where you suggest that there should be a camera in every classroom in order to root out… let me get this accurate…”civilization ending poison.”
https://twitter.com/ndrew.../status/1412566208763895810

I’m going to zig where you thought most teachers would zag. I welcome your Orwellian cameras in my classroom. Frankly, I don’t know many teachers who would object to having people watch what we do. As a matter of fact, I hate to tell you this Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson, but most of us spent the last year having video cameras in our classrooms.

See, I think you believe that your suggestion that people see what happens in our classrooms will somehow scare teachers. The truth of it is that we have been begging for years to have people, such as yourself, come into our classrooms.

I somewhat famously asked Ms. DeVos to visit a public school before she became Secretary of Education (https://www.huffpost.com/.../an-introduction-from-public...). It’s unclear whether she has yet to set foot in an actual public school classroom, but I digress.

I sense that you think you’ll see all of us pinko teachers speaking endlessly about Critical Race Theory leading to…
and again, let me get this right, “civilization ending poison.”

I’ve been in a lot of classrooms (more than you I am willing to bet) and think you’re going to be disappointed on that front. What happens in America’s classrooms is teaching and learning.

Your “spy cameras” will see teachers and students working together to be better every day. I’ll tell you what I saw on a tour of classrooms not that long ago.

I saw a group of kindergartners trying to create bridges over running water with basic classroom supplies in a lesson about collaboration. I saw a high school literature class talking about the character development in The Glass Menagerie. I saw a middle school history class participating in group project where they had to solve problems in a fictional city, with specifics of how they would utilize resources and build public support for their projects.

Anyone watching your cameras will see learning…
all day every day. For those who watch your “nanny cams” carefully, they’ll see a lot of other things as well. They will see teachers working with students who have vastly different life experiences.

They will see students who are fluent in multiple languages working with teachers to become proficient in yet one more language. They will see students who are hungry get their one solid meal a day in the cafeteria. They will see students itching for more fine arts, industrial technology, or world languages to be offered in their school. In my classroom, if we’re being honest, they’ll probably hear some sketchy intonation from my saxophones, and I promise we’re working on it. But for sure, they will see learning… all day every day.

To be honest, I’m fascinated by the logistics of your proposal. In a world where school districts are struggling to recruit and maintain teachers, who is going to man your “citizen review boards” (setting aside the fact that public school teachers already answer to publicly elected school boards)?

For instance, in my school district I sense you would need well over 500 cameras going every day. Who watches those 500 screens 10 hours a day (I want you watching my 7 am jazz band and my after school lessons)?

What qualifications would these “experts” need to know what they were watching for? What happens when they catch a teacher teaching… let me get this right… ”civilization ending poison?” Who do they report that to? I’m also curious who will pay for all of this incredible technology.

Maybe I missed it, but can you point me to a K-12 institution where Critical Race Theory is being taught? Hell, can you define Critical Race Theory for all of us? I’m sure you’ve got answers to all of these questions.

Frankly, I’ve never been able to figure out, instead of dreaming up Orwellian plans to have Big Brother in all of our classrooms, why you don’t round up an army of bright young conservatives to actually step up and teach?

Is it because teachers work hard, aren’t paid as much as those with similar educational backgrounds, don’t have support from our elected officials, constantly serve as punching bags for those who don’t understand public education, or is it just because it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than to build one?

Here’s the real deal Tuck, I grew up with my mom making me eat your family’s Salisbury Steaks once every couple of weeks (his family makes Swanson TV dinners) for many years. I struggle to take advice on teaching and learning from a guy who makes a steak that, on its best day, tastes like shoe leather that has been left out in a goat pasture for a few weeks.

I get that Critical Race Theory is your latest attempt to scare your easily manipulated demographic, but let’s just admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

With all of that being said, count me on the cameras Tucky. Like many teachers, I’m in the early stages of understanding Critical Race Theory (most of us hadn’t heard about it until you and your people started crying about it), but if you find me teaching it, have one of the Tucker Youth watching your surveillance devices let me know.

If Critical Race Theory involves talking honestly about American history, I’m probably doing that sometimes. I spent much of the last six years advocating for a way for teaching to become more transparent, and in the dumbest way possible, you are joining that crusade. Let’s make this happen TV Dinner Boy.

Sincerely,
Patrick J. Kearney
Actual Teacher”

(Copied from Kim Larkin-Floria)
Does she know the Florida teachers unions take the exact opposite position?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Does she know the Florida teachers unions take the exact opposite position?
We all know anyone who voluntarily resides in Florida has a screw loose. That’s all you got, though? I thought the logistics part was interesting. We all know it’s just a silly idea in general.
 
Most states don’t require a world history curriculum but every state has an American history requirement, so not only is it not word play, it’s extremely relevant to the discussion.
Yes. I would imagine discussions about slavery in American classrooms would center on slavery in America. At least that’s how it was when I went through grade school.
 
Ask a fish to describe water and they will say the same thing. You can’t conceive or describe something as “different “ when it is the only world you have ever known. Public education has been indoctrinating kids so long now I have no trouble believing that some of them honestly don’t know they are doing it. And the ones who do see what’s going on are too afraid to speak up about it, especially once you reach the University level
What a load of crap....and a horrible analogy. Fish would describe water differently because it is different from place to place.
You appear to have been indoctrinated far more than you claim most children are.
 
To expand on this thought, this open letter is from an Iowa Teacher addressed to FOX News host, Tucker Carlson. I found it very interesting.

“Dear Tucker Carlson,

Hey Tuck, I just finished watching a segment of your show. You know, the one where you suggest that there should be a camera in every classroom in order to root out… let me get this accurate…”civilization ending poison.”
https://twitter.com/ndrew.../status/1412566208763895810

I’m going to zig where you thought most teachers would zag. I welcome your Orwellian cameras in my classroom. Frankly, I don’t know many teachers who would object to having people watch what we do. As a matter of fact, I hate to tell you this Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson, but most of us spent the last year having video cameras in our classrooms.

See, I think you believe that your suggestion that people see what happens in our classrooms will somehow scare teachers. The truth of it is that we have been begging for years to have people, such as yourself, come into our classrooms.

I somewhat famously asked Ms. DeVos to visit a public school before she became Secretary of Education (https://www.huffpost.com/.../an-introduction-from-public...). It’s unclear whether she has yet to set foot in an actual public school classroom, but I digress.

I sense that you think you’ll see all of us pinko teachers speaking endlessly about Critical Race Theory leading to…
and again, let me get this right, “civilization ending poison.”

I’ve been in a lot of classrooms (more than you I am willing to bet) and think you’re going to be disappointed on that front. What happens in America’s classrooms is teaching and learning.

Your “spy cameras” will see teachers and students working together to be better every day. I’ll tell you what I saw on a tour of classrooms not that long ago.

I saw a group of kindergartners trying to create bridges over running water with basic classroom supplies in a lesson about collaboration. I saw a high school literature class talking about the character development in The Glass Menagerie. I saw a middle school history class participating in group project where they had to solve problems in a fictional city, with specifics of how they would utilize resources and build public support for their projects.

Anyone watching your cameras will see learning…
all day every day. For those who watch your “nanny cams” carefully, they’ll see a lot of other things as well. They will see teachers working with students who have vastly different life experiences.

They will see students who are fluent in multiple languages working with teachers to become proficient in yet one more language. They will see students who are hungry get their one solid meal a day in the cafeteria. They will see students itching for more fine arts, industrial technology, or world languages to be offered in their school. In my classroom, if we’re being honest, they’ll probably hear some sketchy intonation from my saxophones, and I promise we’re working on it. But for sure, they will see learning… all day every day.

To be honest, I’m fascinated by the logistics of your proposal. In a world where school districts are struggling to recruit and maintain teachers, who is going to man your “citizen review boards” (setting aside the fact that public school teachers already answer to publicly elected school boards)?

For instance, in my school district I sense you would need well over 500 cameras going every day. Who watches those 500 screens 10 hours a day (I want you watching my 7 am jazz band and my after school lessons)?

What qualifications would these “experts” need to know what they were watching for? What happens when they catch a teacher teaching… let me get this right… ”civilization ending poison?” Who do they report that to? I’m also curious who will pay for all of this incredible technology.

Maybe I missed it, but can you point me to a K-12 institution where Critical Race Theory is being taught? Hell, can you define Critical Race Theory for all of us? I’m sure you’ve got answers to all of these questions.

Frankly, I’ve never been able to figure out, instead of dreaming up Orwellian plans to have Big Brother in all of our classrooms, why you don’t round up an army of bright young conservatives to actually step up and teach?

Is it because teachers work hard, aren’t paid as much as those with similar educational backgrounds, don’t have support from our elected officials, constantly serve as punching bags for those who don’t understand public education, or is it just because it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than to build one?

Here’s the real deal Tuck, I grew up with my mom making me eat your family’s Salisbury Steaks once every couple of weeks (his family makes Swanson TV dinners) for many years. I struggle to take advice on teaching and learning from a guy who makes a steak that, on its best day, tastes like shoe leather that has been left out in a goat pasture for a few weeks.

I get that Critical Race Theory is your latest attempt to scare your easily manipulated demographic, but let’s just admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

With all of that being said, count me on the cameras Tucky. Like many teachers, I’m in the early stages of understanding Critical Race Theory (most of us hadn’t heard about it until you and your people started crying about it), but if you find me teaching it, have one of the Tucker Youth watching your surveillance devices let me know.

If Critical Race Theory involves talking honestly about American history, I’m probably doing that sometimes. I spent much of the last six years advocating for a way for teaching to become more transparent, and in the dumbest way possible, you are joining that crusade. Let’s make this happen TV Dinner Boy.

Sincerely,
Patrick J. Kearney
Actual Teacher”

(Copied from Kim Larkin-Floria)

Imagine if 1984 was about government workers crying about being "spied" on by citizens. Lol. His Orwell metaphor is not the stroke of genius he thinks it is.
 
Does she know the Florida teachers unions take the exact opposite position?
So what's your conclusion?
That all teachers do not feel the same about this issue, or any issue?
Imagine that.
It does however complicate your broad brush painting of all things public education
 
So what's your conclusion?
That all teachers do not feel the same about this issue, or any issue?
Imagine that.
It does however complicate your broad brush painting of all things public education
The claim was that „most educators“ favoured classroom cameras. The counter fact offered es that Unions representing said teachers appear to be taking the opposite stance. So now we are faced with two new questions. 1) are the unions in question this operating in direct opposition to their membership? And 2) if so, where is the effort by the now misrepresented teachers that we should now logically expect?
A simple introduction of a new fact that seems to require a reexamination of a hypothesis ist all this is.
 
Throwing rocks again. Most here are great at diatribes about what they think is so wrong, but I hear very little that are solution oriented.

Where are the young conservatives lining up to teach American youth? Oh, that’s right, nobody wants to teach anymore because of the low pay, high stress, education requirements, and endless political damnation from one of the country’s two political parties.

So keep up the handwringing, it’s going to go a long way I’m sure of it.
They are at private and charter schools teaching better education.
 
I have three immediate family members in public school education. Have asked each one of them about CRT and all have said they couldn’t even describe it and have never heard it or it’s ideology referenced in the learning environment. They are just teaching music, reading, and civics (respectively) as they have for decades. All are open to members of the public participating in the learning process as well.

CRT sounds like yet another political boogeyman. Conservatives love tearing down education, but I don’t hear much about concerted efforts that train young conservatives to enter the teaching profession. Maybe it’s easier to throw rocks at a house than it is to help build one.
“Tearing down education” or correctly pointing out the reasons that public schools are failing?
 
It is 100% a political boogeyman. It's just one more in a long line of "issues" overblown by the right to rile their base through hatred and division.
It's been a very successful formula for them.
Like lynching? Which hasn’t happened since 1981?
 
The claim was that „most educators“ favoured classroom cameras. The counter fact offered es that Unions representing said teachers appear to be taking the opposite stance. So now we are faced with two new questions. 1) are the unions in question this operating in direct opposition to their membership? And 2) if so, where is the effort by the now misrepresented teachers that we should now logically expect?
A simple introduction of a new fact that seems to require a reexamination of a hypothesis ist all this is.
You use more words to say less than any other poster in the PF.
Some teachers would love to have cameras in the classroom.
Some teachers could care less whether or not there are cameras in the classroom.
Some teachers would hate to have cameras in the classroom.
And that has very little to do with how those teachers teach.
It's more of a legal issue than anything else.
 
What a load of crap....and a horrible analogy. Fish would describe water differently because it is different from place to place.
You appear to have been indoctrinated far more than you claim most children are.
Maybe, maybe. 😂
But in a sense, aren’t we all? None of us is born knowing anything more than 1) I’m cold 2) I’m hungry and 3) I need to poop. Beyond that, every other thing we now „know“ has either been taught to us (indoctrination) or learned by direct experience. The wise person spends the rest of their life trying to see how well the facts Thames have been told hold up when tested by personal experience. And so far, my testing seems to indicate that the facts as explained to me by conservatives seem to match up a whole lot better to reality than the „let’s us create paradise on earth for you by taxing and spending you into oblivion“ progressives.
I could be wrong I admit. But now I’ve got to go spend the better part of a Benjamin for a tank of gas and then see how much money has to come out of savings so we can afford to eat this week.
Cheers Commrade!!!!
 
The left doesn't want to diddle kids. They want to create little revolutionaries. To do that they need to sever the bond between students and the parents they believe are raising their children to be hateful bigots. In order to sever the bond between parents and their children, the left is using a two-pronged approach.

Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology (properly known as Queer Theory) are not two unrelated sets of ideas. They are two parts of the same strategy. CRT is usually the first set of ideas to be introduced. This is often enough to radicalize racial minorities, but it's merely step one for white (or white adjacent) students. CRT instills in these students a negative self-identity as they're taught to believe they're recipients of enormous privilege that was stolen from others and that they are complicit in historic and ongoing injustice. In child terms, they're taught to believe they're bad. Apart from the shame and guilt, this also gives them a worldview at odds with the one their parents grew up with and are trying to pass on to their kids. Step one is complete.

Once CRT is done tearing down these kids and leaving them with a negative self-identity, Queer Theory (QT) is introduced and offers them a wide assortment of positive self-identities to choose from. Instead of living with the shame and guilt of being a member of the oppressive dominant culture, these students can be celebrated for coming out as gender nonbinary or pansexual. In an instant, these kids can trade their negative self-identity and all the accompanying guilt and shame of being an "oppressor" for a positive self-identity as a much-venerated "oppressed" minority.

At this point, the left desperately wants this new identity to stay at school so it has time to be cemented before the parents find out. In the guise of helping these students, schools withhold this information about their child's new identity from mom and dad. Once the parents do find out about their child's new identity it's firmly in place and an adversarial relationship between the child and parents has been manufactured. It takes extraordinarily deft parenting to repair the relationship once it has reached this stage.

The parents' tendency will be to overreact and push the child further into the arms of the woke radicals who now have the little revolutionary they wanted from the beginning. The bond between parents and child has been severed ending the perpetuation of hate and bigotry. The left is determined to replicate this process in as many families as they can using whatever means at their disposal. It's not about diddling kids. It's about capturing the minds of impressionable children.

Unfortunately, this creates environments where actual predators can thrive. When young children are isolated from their parents, encouraged to adopt different beliefs, and keep secrets from their parents, they are made easy targets for abusers.

Hear me loud and clear on this. Most teachers love the kids in their classrooms and want only the best for them. They have had their empathy *for* these students weaponized *against* them by leftist activists promoting educational programs that sound nice and caring. Highly empathetic teachers are being used to promote this agenda unaware of its insidious purpose. An example: I recently saw a teacher at a Christian school announce that she would no longer be using the words "mom", "dad", or "parents" in her classroom. Her reason? She had just read a paper on the importance of making kids from non-traditional families feel included. She suggested replacing "Donuts with Dads" with "Bagels with Buds" or something of the such. This sounds like a very considerate thing to do for kids who might feel different because they don't have a dad or live with their grandparents, but its purpose is to subtly chip away at the very idea of the normative nuclear family (a stated goal of the BLM organization.)

Christians who think that we can embrace the ideas from CRT and reject radical gender ideology need to realize how the former is used to prepare kids to accept the latter. These are your kids we're talking about. The left wants them. They would love to sever your bond with them. They think your appeals to childhood innocence are an attempt to force heteronormativity on them. Seriously. They write papers on it. It's not a secret agenda.
You left out the part where they have to do this to your kids because they don’t have enough of their own to propagate their agenda. How many pubs only have one child versus the homeschoolers
 
You said political bogeyman so I am assuming you also are against the Dems and Biden creating a federal act against lynching for pandering since one hadn’t happened in America in nearly 40 years
Don't know anything about it. Seems unnecessary, it would already fall under hate crimes.
 
We all know anyone who voluntarily resides in Florida has a screw loose. That’s all you got, though? I thought the logistics part was interesting. We all know it’s just a silly idea in general.
Riiiight. One of the fastest growing states in the nation is only populated by the crazy. If your assumption is correct, then the only conclusion we can male is that tje majority of humans have. Screw lose.
So how do you explain the mass exodus from California in light of your hypothesis?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77

VN Store



Back
Top