LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 55,556
- Likes
- 55,738
I'll take a break from beating Dobbs4Heisman over the head. In looking at this his predictions here aren't that bad.
A. Notre Dame didn't go 11-1, but they were far more legit and relevant this season than most predicted.
B. Clemson won the ACC and most were predicting FSU to win the ACC this season.
C. Mayfield won the Heisman. He may have been the front runner heading into the season, but usually the winner is someone like Lamar Jackson, Cam Newton, Tim Tebow, etc., that was on no one's radar when the season started.
D. Predicting USC to win the Pac 12 wasn't that special. Getting their final record and one of the two losses predicted in the final record was impressive. Same goes for Oklahoma. Had them 13-0. They were 12-1. They were favored to win the Big 12 I am sure, but I don't know how many thought they'd be this strong with Stoops quitting.
He was off on was the Big 10. He was also off on Tennessee prediction and I think it's kind of obvious that was a drunk as hell homer move.
Basically, to be fair, a lot of people have purchased magazines and other publications over the years that were a hell of a lot more wrong than this.
you are still leaving off at least half of his predictions on the year.
Michigan being elite being another, his "talent" evaluations are jokes as well.
also a bunch of his predictions aren't stretches. Clemson vs FSU, that was a coin flip going into the year and who knows what happens if FSU keeps their QB. Oklahoma and Mayfield, yawn.
he continuously acts like his predictions are hot takes even if he only hits 1/10. thats why he gets grief.