hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 116,237
- Likes
- 167,389
That alone isn't DEI. An institution actively seeking students who meet the standard but come from a low income house, or are a minority is not the DEI being discussed. Setting different standards so a low income or minority student can be accepted is.
I don't agree and that's the problem when discussing DEI, it means different things to different people. If Vance got into Yale over more qualified candidates because of his income/regional status, how is that any different from an African American who gets in due to racial/income status over a white kid with better credentials? The picking and choosing of what constitutes DEI in this thread seems to be based on "vibes" rather than consistent internal logic.
How is what you said any different than my post? Seeking out people of certain income levels or minorities that meet the standards while technically is DEI its isn't what is being argued over. I don't think trying to diversify a student body or employee pool that way is harmful or controversial. Admitting/hiring people who do not meet the standard because of their income or minority status is what's being discussed and harms an organization.
If Vance was admitted to college with lower grades/test scores than what is the standard because he came from a low income family then yes that is the same DEI BS being discussed.