'24 DC OT Jordan Seaton (Future Portal Entry)

Yea don't understand the downplaying of what Golesh has done so far down there. His success hurts folks argument that he wasn't a huge loss to our offense.
Golesh' success simply proves that Heupel taught him well and he was a good student. The difference wasn't Golesh, it was HH and Hyatt.
 
Golesh' success simply proves that Heupel taught him well and he was a good student. The difference wasn't Golesh, it was HH and Hyatt.
I’m glad to see Golesh doing well. It’s good to have former assistants experiencing success in the lower ranks. I hope Heupel is here for a long time, but if he wins a NC and decides to test the NFL, an already seasoned former assistant, available to step in, who has an existing relationship with our AD, is ideal.

Plus, he seems like a likable dude.
 
I’m glad to see Golesh doing well. It’s good to have former assistants experiencing success in the lower ranks. I hope Heupel is here for a long time, but if he wins a NC and decides to test the NFL, an already seasoned former assistant, available to step in, who has an existing relationship with our AD, is ideal.

Plus, he seems like a likable dude.
Pretty obvious he was/is an elite coach.
 
Golesh? The early returns are good. Elite is a little strong at this point. It’s only one season, but going from 1 win to 7 in year 1 is impressive. Very similar to what Heupel did in year 1. Hope both continue the upward trajectory.
Yes, an elite offensive coach. He took a yaw yaw team and helped turn it into an 11-2 team. Worst to first, best offense in CFB.

Then took a USF bools team, and trounced Syracuse in the Boca Del Vista bowl. Yes, he is an elite offensive coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cbateman7606
I believe Seaton is a Vol by days end.

Who’s with me?
This one is not going to happen. There was a time when it was, but that’s passed. Our efforts are focused in other places now. We’re answering the phone when he calls but not spending all our time and efforts toward pursuing him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BristolVol
Golesh' success simply proves that Heupel taught him well and he was a good student. The difference wasn't Golesh, it was HH and Hyatt.
Correct. I’m sure there were plenty of plays Heupel probably wanted to run but wasn’t confident we could execute. Hence why, the offense looked different under Hooker and even under Nico in limited snaps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSVol
Yes, an elite offensive coach. He took a yaw yaw team and helped turn it into an 11-2 team. Worst to first, best offense in CFB.

Then took a USF bools team, and trounced Syracuse in the Boca Del Vista bowl. Yes, he is an elite offensive coach.
Okay. I was just saying his success as a head coach at USF could end up being a good thing for UT if we need to replace Heupel one day. He seems to have learned the Heupel offense well.
 
You can’t lose what you never had
Yes, you can. Recruiting is a competition for a commitment. A competition can be won or lost. Apply your argument to games. In effect you are erroneously saying that we cannot lose a game because we never had it.
 
Last edited:
With how crappy the OLine recruit development has been over the last two years, Seaton is very much welcome here


Seaton, Ginther, Warren, Satterwhite, and Anderson are immediate upgrades over guys like Reddick and Grant. Get them in the program and prep them to be able to take over next year.

Only young lineman we have I have any confidence in is Vysen Lang and that’s only because he was supposedly our back up center at one point. No one else can sniff the fields

Hell I bet if we landed Seaton, he could push for one of the guard spots year one
 
This one is not going to happen. There was a time when it was, but that’s passed. Our efforts are focused in other places now. We’re answering the phone when he calls but not spending all our time and efforts toward pursuing him.
So is he calling?
 
Yes, you can. Recruiting is a competition for a commitment. A competition can be won or lost. Apply your argument to games. In effect you are erroneously saying that we cannot lose a game because we never had it.

Apply this argument to interviewing for a job. If someone else is chosen, you didn’t lose the job. You lost the opportunity to continue to interview for the job - the only thing you actually had.

When a recruit picks another school, you lose the opportunity to continue to show them why they should come to your school, bc that’s all you had. Never had a commitment = never had the recruit. Thus you cannot lose them.
 

VN Store



Back
Top