CagleMtnVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
- Messages
- 27,878
- Likes
- 44,565
this is just as dumb as DEI.Donald Trump to Ban Transgender Troops And DEI Military Programs in latest executive order flurry
President Donald Trump is turbocharging his attack on government diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs by now banning the practice from the military.
Trump plans to sign two executive orders this week that will both eliminate DEI from the military and prohibit transgender people from the services, DailyMail.com confirmed.
![]()
Trump will ban trans troops, DEI military programs in executive orders
President Donald Trump is enhancing his attack on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs by now banning the practice from the military.www.dailymail.co.uk
this is just as dumb as DEI.
have a standard across the board. if they can meet it, they are in. if they can't they are out. Black, white, trans, straight, male, female.
it would be one thing if he banned the military paying for the surgeries, and removing the protection while "transitioning", but out right firing the people without some metric based decision is terrible.
If one views transgenderism as a legitimate “normal” human situation then yes it’s a dumb position. Not unreasonable to discharge anyone from the military if they have a serious mental illness IF transgender is viewed as a mental illness.this is just as dumb as DEI.
have a standard across the board. if they can meet it, they are in. if they can't they are out. Black, white, trans, straight, male, female.
it would be one thing if he banned the military paying for the surgeries, and removing the protection while "transitioning", but out right firing the people without some metric based decision is terrible.
make it part of the standard. I don't care if they are straight, gay, or trans if they aren't mentally capable of handling the job. and if they can handle the mental part of it they can have the job if they want it, trans or not.If one views transgenderism as a legitimate “normal” human situation then yes it’s a dumb position. Not unreasonable to discharge anyone from the military if they have a serious mental illness IF transgender is viewed as a mental illness.
one standard is a start. I have no problem if it raises. but having multiple standards, even if they all rise, doesn't make sense to me.Having 1 standard across the board is just part of the answer, they must also increase the standards. It's easy to tout "we have one standard" and that standard is basically breathing.
Maybe I'm wrong but I thought the target was getting rid of "programs" that focus on the DEI thing. Just as you say if X person wants to be in the military and passes all the qualification requirements then there you have it. Why would that require any special programs/personnel/costs to make happen?this is just as dumb as DEI.
have a standard across the board. if they can meet it, they are in. if they can't they are out. Black, white, trans, straight, male, female.
it would be one thing if he banned the military paying for the surgeries, and removing the protection while "transitioning", but out right firing the people without some metric based decision is terrible.
that should be the focus. but if the tweet is to be believed, that is not the only thing that was said.Maybe I'm wrong but I thought the target was getting rid of "programs" that focus on the DEI thing. Just as you say if X person wants to be in the military and passes all the qualification requirements then there you have it. Why would that require any special programs/personnel/costs to make happen?
I guess I would look at that individually. Under the same criteria as my first post I don't see way there would need to be a "program" to keep regarding trans people. (or black/asian/female/whatever)that should be the focus. but if the tweet is to be believed, that is not the only thing that was said.
"that will both eliminate DEI from the military and prohibit transgender people from the services"
one standard is a start. I have no problem if it raises. but having multiple standards, even if they all rise, doesn't make sense to me.
That is all I think anyone with any modicum of sanity wants. Unfortunately the touchy feely left wants to lower the bar for certain segments or 'protected classes'. Sec Hegseth caught crap from the idiot left for his championing of just this fact. Women as a whole are not as strong as men. Period. In NO WAY, should the standard for PT be lowered for warfighters. If they cannot do X number of pushups... out. If they cannot carry 100# a mile in the snow.... out. No questions should ever be asked about that. It is the left that is trying to destroy the military by these shenanigans, and hopefully it is coming to an end. The mental illness that pervades the gender dysphoria group is an entirely different discussion.this is just as dumb as DEI.
have a standard across the board. if they can meet it, they are in. if they can't they are out. Black, white, trans, straight, male, female.
it would be one thing if he banned the military paying for the surgeries, and removing the protection while "transitioning", but out right firing the people without some metric based decision is terrible.
The Army lowered some standards for a lot of things for a few years when they struggled making their recruiting numbers. ASVAB scores, tattoos etc. I knew a kid who had been out of rehab for Meth about 2 weeks and joined the Army, guy was through MEPS and shipped out in less than a month.When did they lower the standards for Ranger School?
They let those women see and practice the course ahead of time, and then gave them multiple chances after failures.