SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 52,710
- Likes
- 65,858
The new talking point is " as long as they are saying what they want to hear, it's OK". Both nash and huff have now used a version of that.What evidence do you want???? I have seen affidavits rejected by the left...documents denied, laptops, diaries....seems no amount of evidence will satisfy what you don't wanna believe....do you have security clearance to see the details of the things they are *****ing down...if you need TS clearance to view them, how can they prove them without the citizens having TS clearance l..
The new talking point is " as long as they are saying what they want to hear, it's OK". Both nash and huff have now used a version of that.
You're so far off the map, it's hard to know where to begin.
I said that things would be easier to get done if they weren't so loud about their trolling. It was not a judgement of whether or not the things they were saying were "OK" in a broad sense.
Then people said they gotta be loud for PR, which I challenged for good reason. It doesn't help to call the USAID a criminal organization.
Then people said it's for transparency, which I challenged for good reason. Transparency would be telling us everything, not lies and truths that they're OK with us hearing.
At no point did I say "it's not OK for them to say stuff I don't like." I'm just talking about being effective and not letting politicization get in the way of progress.
Since the R’s are following the desires of the citizens by auditing government spending to reduce waste, why is the waste assigned as either R or D? Seems like it would all be assigned to the House and Senate since they are the ones who appropriate government spending. If the current findings somehow reflect more poorly on the D’s, then the D’s should start digging for waste themselves and find some that reflect poorly on the R’s instead of crying foul to the media in an attempt to deflect attention away from the problem.You're not explaining why they need PR to do their job.
You think if they talk about waste suddenly voters are going to change how they hold officials accountable? Who didn't know there was egregious waste in government? Who? Not one person ITT who is satisfied with DOGE ongoings is asking "what about R's?" and that's how you know they're not changing anything with how we hold officials accountable.
I don't understand how tipping their hand helps them in instances where they say they are going after politicians who got suspiciously wealthy during their tenure. Imagine if LEO investigators did that. We're gonna raid Diddy's house later. We're tweeting this for PR.
Since the R’s are following the desires of the citizens by auditing government spending to reduce waste, why is the waste assigned as either R or D? Seems like it would all be assigned to the House and Senate since they are the ones who appropriate government spending. If the current findings somehow reflect more poorly on the D’s, then the D’s should start digging for waste themselves and find some that reflect poorly on the R’s instead of crying foul to the media in an attempt to deflect attention away from the problem.
Since the R’s are following the desires of the citizens by auditing government spending to reduce waste, why is the waste assigned as either R or D? Seems like it would all be assigned to the House and Senate since they are the ones who appropriate government spending. If the current findings somehow reflect more poorly on the D’s, then the D’s should start digging for waste themselves and find some that reflect poorly on the R’s instead of crying foul to the media in an attempt to deflect attention away from the problem.
i suspect neither side is interested in tackling the massive corruption in government private contractorsSince the R’s are following the desires of the citizens by auditing government spending to reduce waste, why is the waste assigned as either R or D? Seems like it would all be assigned to the House and Senate since they are the ones who appropriate government spending. If the current findings somehow reflect more poorly on the D’s, then the D’s should start digging for waste themselves and find some that reflect poorly on the R’s instead of crying foul to the media in an attempt to deflect attention away from the problem.
LOL
Nobody knows how this happened, but somehow the people choosing where to look and what to reveal found their opponents to be more guilty of impropriety. Crazy, right?
A balanced budget in year one considering the deficits we currently have is a big ask. But it should be a lot closer than it is now.The only receipt that is going to matter is a smaller budget next year. Preferably a balanced budget.
If they don’t get there, then I would say it’s all a dog and pony show.
LOL
Nobody knows how this happened, but somehow the people choosing where to look and what to reveal found their opponents to be more guilty of impropriety. Crazy, right?
This is what I said since DOGE's inception...R's are probably not going to like it when the shoe is on the other foot.
Even more reason to show your work and say "these are the payments we're referring to" rather than relying on 'everyone in the public' to verify for themselves
. Somebody does it for you - you're unhappy.
Somebody tells you that you should do it yourself - you're unhappy.
You won't be pleased until orange man gone no matter what.
Then you get 8 years of JD.
It's really not that complicated. If you're finding all this waste, simply back it up. Everyone should be able to agree on that (the counter argument is what, we don't need evidence?) but people love their "team" too much, football forum style. Somebody does it for you - you're unhappy.
Somebody tells you that you should do it yourself - you're unhappy.
You won't be pleased until orange man gone no matter what.
Then you get 8 years of JD.
Didn't you say there was a database to look up all the projects USAId is funding?? If so couldn't you then verify what is being claimed is fact or not?? It'd be more reliable then Twitter which has cought many of us with fake tweetsIt's really not that complicated. If you're finding all this waste, simply back it up. Everyone should be able to agree on that (the counter argument is what, we don't need evidence?) but people love their "team" too much, football forum style