Derek Chauvin trial

The only evidence of what he intended to do with it was what he possessed. That’s a possession case.
Except you clearly understand the elements of resell. Which is the reason simple possession is no big deal whereas if you have felony amounts of narcotics you are definitely not just a “possession” case
 
Just think how great this country will be when the millennials like dinkinflicka take over. So far they're doing great with the racial division.

I’m sure he’s of the opinion black people are wrongly hunted down and killed for nothing while ignoring the massive disproportionate crime rate. Then he’ll probably say something about drugs or the war on drugs. Just legalize all drugs and the gang violence, gun violence, robberies, murders, and all other crimes being disproportionately committed go away.
 
Except you clearly understand the elements of resell. Which is the reason simple possession is no big deal whereas if you have felony amounts of narcotics you are definitely not just a “possession” case
Again, the only evidence of his “intent” was what he possessed. There was no witness to a sale, no incriminating statements, text messages, not even complaints of heavy traffic to the house. It’s a possession case where a jury saw fit to infer that he was a drug dealer because of what he possessed.

I possess quantities of a substance containing a drug that far exceeds the amount I can safely consume in one sitting. I possess digital scales, measuring spoons, mugs, spoons and other paraphernalia used for the handling, processing, and consumption of said substance. At various times, I’ve possessed individually packaged quantities of the substance. The substance is coffee, I’ve never intended to sell so much as a gram of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
Again, the only evidence of his “intent” was what he possessed. There was no witness to a sale, no incriminating statements, text messages, not even complaints of heavy traffic to the house. It’s a possession case where a jury saw fit to infer that he was a drug dealer because of what he possessed.

I possess quantities of a substance containing a drug that far exceeds the amount I can safely consume in one sitting. I possess digital scales, measuring spoons, mugs, spoons and other paraphernalia used for the handling, processing, and consumption of said substance. At various times, I’ve possessed individually packaged quantities of the substance. The substance is coffee, I’ve never intended to sell so much as a gram of it.
Which law journal did you read that little gem from?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
Again, the only evidence of his “intent” was what he possessed. There was no witness to a sale, no incriminating statements, text messages, not even complaints of heavy traffic to the house. It’s a possession case where a jury saw fit to infer that he was a drug dealer because of what he possessed.

I possess quantities of a substance containing a drug that far exceeds the amount I can safely consume in one sitting. I possess digital scales, measuring spoons, mugs, spoons and other paraphernalia used for the handling, processing, and consumption of said substance. At various times, I’ve possessed individually packaged quantities of the substance. The substance is coffee, I’ve never intended to sell so much as a gram of it.
It’s not against the law either. Your client committed the said crime
 
Unlikely. SCOTUS almost certainly isn’t going to take this case.

Looking at his direct appeal, he raised 12 issues that were all shot down. I wonder how many of those were discussed in here, but not enough to go back and look.
Misread your link. I thought they had agreed to take case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill

VN Store



Back
Top