Derek Chauvin trial

Therein lies one of the issues with you righties. Resisting arrest does not empower a rogue cop to be an instantaneous judge, jury and executioner for resisting arrest. The fact the dead person was a “violent felon” which fact comes out after the fact is still not an excuse to murder that person

You fools don’t want your guns to be taken away but a rogue cop can take away a human life and you’re ok with that. But you’re not racist. Right the racist are those accusing you all of being racist. Inverting definitions fools no one
What does any of what you just typed have to do with race?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I am sure that white people were also pulled over for traffic stops as well. The question is how many had violent active warrants and tried to resist and fight from custody?

the active warrants were not violent. again, check your damn facts dude
 
the active warrants were not violent. again, check your damn facts dude
  • In December 2019, Wright and another man were charged with committing first-degree attempted aggravated robbery. The pair were accused of forcing their way into a woman's home and trying to steal $820 from her at gunpoint.
This is was the initial charge that Wright violated by absconding on his bail conditions

  • Documents in the case are filed under the reference 27-CR-21-4400.
  • They detail Wright being charged with carrying a pistol without a permit, and with running from police.
  • A complaint filed on March 4, 2021, alleges that Wright had an encounter with police on June 30, 2020, in Minneapolis.
  • It says officers responded to a call about a man with a gun, and found Wright in a car with other people.
  • The complaint says that Wright ran away from officers, who chased but did not catch him. It said a loaded handgun was found in the car.
This was the outstanding warrant for which he was being arrested for...

these are violent crimes. And on top of that the FACT is he committed at least THREE MORE violent crimes (Resisting, Evading Arrest, Assault) on video during the arrest.

So try harder with your "facts" of explaining how these were "nonviolent" crimes
 
  • In December 2019, Wright and another man were charged with committing first-degree attempted aggravated robbery. The pair were accused of forcing their way into a woman's home and trying to steal $820 from her at gunpoint.
This is was the initial charge that Wright violated by absconding on his bail conditions

  • Documents in the case are filed under the reference 27-CR-21-4400.
  • They detail Wright being charged with carrying a pistol without a permit, and with running from police.
  • A complaint filed on March 4, 2021, alleges that Wright had an encounter with police on June 30, 2020, in Minneapolis.
  • It says officers responded to a call about a man with a gun, and found Wright in a car with other people.
  • The complaint says that Wright ran away from officers, who chased but did not catch him. It said a loaded handgun was found in the car.
This was the outstanding warrant for which he was being arrested for...

these are violent crimes. And on top of that the FACT is he committed at least THREE MORE violent crimes (Resisting, Evading Arrest, Assault) on video during the arrest.

So try harder with your "facts" of explaining how these were "nonviolent" crimes

wrong... the outstanding warrant was for not having a registered pistol.

You are just piling on with charges. Charges that were pending and he should have had due process for. Should have. But he was shot to death by a police officer before he got that
 
wrong... the outstanding warrant was for not having a registered pistol.

You are just piling on with charges. Charges that were pending and he should have had due process for. Should have. But he was shot to death by a police officer
He wasn't allowed to have a firearm because he was a felon that absconded, also the warrant was ALSO for running from police.
And the resisting, evading and assault happened, on video,, and were violent (true or false?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
He wasn't allowed to have a firearm because he was a felon that absconded, also the warrant was ALSO for running from police.
And the resisting, evading and assault happened, on video,, and were violent (true or false?)

Wrong again. He was not a felon, the charges were pending. SMDH.
 
jesus you are dumb....do you know that aggravated robbery is a felony?

And true or false, Wright committed violent crimes on video during the arrest, yes or no? Answer it honestly

I'm dumb but you've been wrong with everything you say. This case has you really confused. But I'm dumb of course :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
I'm dumb but you've been wrong with everything you say. This case has you really confused. But I'm dumb of course :)
Still waiting for a simple answer, much like the racism post, you refuse to answer because you know you are wrong...

Yes or no, Wright committed violent felonies on camera during the arrest?
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
yea well not too many jobs where you can retire at age 50 with a pension so I think we'll be okay finding new officers

I'm more concerned about finding GOOD ones, cause obviously these officers in Minnesota were terrible at their jobs
The female officer made a heat of the moment mistake. You do a job that intense and mistakes happen, even to "good officers". And no it isn't easy to replace them, If it was they wouldn't constantly be looking to staff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Still waiting for a simple answer, much like the racism post, you refuse to answer because you know you are wrong...

Yes or no, Wright committed violent felonies on camera during the arrest?

Looks like it but then the biggest violent felony occurs when the police officer shoots him to death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
wrong... the outstanding warrant was for not having a registered pistol.

You are just piling on with charges. Charges that were pending and he should have had due process for. Should have. But he was shot to death by a police officer before he got that

The righties on this forum whole heartedly believe that cops when interacting with blacks are the sole deciders and the sole executors of due process
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
Good, riots and hell raising should be over by June. Have a project starting up there mid June.

gmmoldpkmlv.jpeg
 
The righties on this forum whole heartedly believe that cops when interacting with blacks are the sole deciders and the sole executors of due process
No, I believe that idiots who resist violently should expect to be met with violence in return. To expect less is idiocy and normalizing that behavior is only perpetuating the problem. Yes there are issues with policing. This case is an example of a mistake made under duress in commission of doing ones job under circumstances 100% initiated by the deceased.

By all appearances one of these two was attempting to do their job in good faith, there is no reason to believe this anything other than a tragic mistake she should answer for. The other was doing their best to be a POS outlaw drain on society. Hard for me to feel much sympathy for him, he created the situation which led to his death.
 
Last edited:
I think it was marijuana, but you can look it up
So he ditched probation for whatever charge and was later charged with felonies for which he was trying to evade police and not answer to. Is that a reasonable basic summary of the events that led up to the day of his traffic stop?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top