Derek Chauvin trial

That does not have one damn thing to do with my point at all. I'm talking about the equal protection clause in response to that post I was replying to. Thanks for ignoring the elephant in the room... but commenting on the flea on its a$$.
And which case are we taking about that allegedly violated the equal protections clause
 
That does not have one damn thing to do with my point at all. I'm talking about the equal protection clause in response to that post I was replying to. Thanks for ignoring the elephant in the room... but commenting on the flea on its a$$.

That’s what all these righties do no matter the subject. Deflect and change the real facts to alternative facts (aka lies) to suit their position

The insurrection and invasion of the Capital was not an insurrection and it definitely wasn’t instigated by Trump and those that invaded the capital were really Antifa masquerading as Proud Boys. A big % of Trump supporters it turns out are just @);&&7 whack jobs living in a conspiratorial la la land
 
That’s what all these righties do no matter the subject. Deflect and change the real facts to alternative facts (aka lies) to suit their position

The insurrection and invasion of the Capital was not an insurrection and it definitely wasn’t instigated by Trump and those that invaded the capital were really Antifa masquerading as Proud Boys. A big % of Trump supporters it turns out are just @);&&7 whack jobs living in a conspiratorial la la land
It was an insurrection in which the “insurrectionists” were so fearful of DC’s draconian gun laws that they left their firearms at home. The Minutemen of Lexington and Concord would have been proud.
 
Last edited:
And which case are we taking about that allegedly violated the equal protections clause
It wasn't in reference to any specific case. It was a response to the post by @LookinUp (post #1,099 of this thread), which suggested that the manner in which police officers conduct an investigation and take a suspect into custody, be determined on a case by case basis, following a review of the criminal record of the suspect in question. That post (and once again, it's #1,099 of this thread) also implied that citizens with a prior criminal record be denied due process. Such a law enforcement policy would not be in compliance with the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
 
Did the Supreme Court not rule that the role of police is not actually to protect and serve?

Art imitating life.

2005-z-movie-car-transformers-barricade-saleen-mustang
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
Ok, don't know a thing about this. One very important item is ..... was the guy a habitual criminal? I know years ago the guy out in L.A. that finally got took out by the police had an extensive record. That was way past due. The police, out there, should have gotten a medal for that. Instead, the liberal jury rewarded the family for his criminal activity by awarding to them millions of dollars.
@Rickyvol77,

This is the post I replied to. My point, is that equal protection under the law means just that. Every citizen is entitled to it, whether they are a habitual criminal or not.
 
I never hear the dems here and around the country protest or riot over these cases. I can’t help but wonder why that is
They aren’t protesting because they know justice will be served and nobody is trying to act like the children had it coming.
 
That’s what all these righties do no matter the subject. Deflect and change the real facts to alternative facts (aka lies) to suit their position

The insurrection and invasion of the Capital was not an insurrection and it definitely wasn’t instigated by Trump and those that invaded the capital were really Antifa masquerading as Proud Boys. A big % of Trump supporters it turns out are just @);&&7 whack jobs living in a conspiratorial la la land
LOL
 
We don’t live in a police state. Our police are intended to protect and serve.

All you gun lovers are quick to protect your guns but slow to protect mankind from rogue cops. Your answer is jump out of your car and become submissive to the cops. But you’re not black. And any black person, it seems by your collective posts, who balks at that because he is afraid he will become another unarmed black man murdered by the police got what he deserved. He got what he deserved Because he wasn’t submissive? That’s the collective wisdom of you all ? It is

George Floyd did get out of his car if you remember. A white EMT begged the cops to let her treat him after identifying herself as an EMT. He died about 5 minutes before Chauvin removed his knee from his neck. She was deemed to be part of the unruly mob of about 6 who 4 or 5 cops with guns were afraid of

A policeman’s job is to enforce the laws, protect and serve is a motto not a job description
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Rickyvol77
She killed him out of negligence and bad training yes, but that's not being "heavy handed" and it wasn't a "shoot first ask questions later" scenario that you stated....the suspect started the violence
I'm guessing he just decided to pull himself over then
 

VN Store



Back
Top