Derek Chauvin trial

[bamawriter]

Is it part of it?

Is what part of what?

 

[NEO]

you got a lot to learn lol. Trump was never removed from office, his term ended.... on January 20th, 13 days after he incited that riot

You aren't very bright are you???

His term ended because he wasnt re elected. The vote that took place later was to confirm the electoral college results and elect Biden.

At this point Trump was no longer going to be in office so there was nothing to remove.

You just sound stupid at this point.

Seriously, you new members get dumber and dumber.

 

[dovervolz]

you got a lot to learn lol. Trump was never removed from office, his term ended.... on January 20th, 13 days after he incited that riot

Looks like you have a lot to learn. What proof do you have that he actually incited a riot? Did he publicly state that they needed to “more confrontational “ than just looting, burning businesses and govt. properties, assaulting innocent people, and threatening law enforcement officers? By the way trump was acquitted, so therefore he didn’t incite.

 

[NEO]

Looks like you have a lot to learn. What proof do you have that he actually incited a riot? Did he publicly state that they needed to “more confrontational “ than just looting, burning businesses and govt. properties, assaulting innocent people, and threatening law enforcement officers? By the way trump was acquitted, so therefore he didn’t incite.

He doesnt seem to get the fact that the riot happened jan 6th and Congress confirmed the electoral college the same day thus electing Biden to office.

At this point Trump was already set to be removed.

We can debate whether he incited it or not all day but we can't debate the fact there was no held office by him to remove now.

The whole impeachment sham was to attempt to prevent him from ever being able to run again.

It's like the libs on here just say stuff to say it and don't realize they will get fact checked here by actual fact checkers.

 

[Tastylicks]

Looks like you have a lot to learn. What proof do you have that he actually incited a riot? Did he publicly state that they needed to “more confrontational “ than just looting, burning businesses and govt. properties, assaulting innocent people, and threatening law enforcement officers? By the way trump was acquitted, so therefore he didn’t incite.

I watched him incite the riot with my own eyes. He told his adoring, violent supporters to march to the Capitol, and they did. They killed a police officer too btw

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

I watched him incite the riot with my own eyes. He told his adoring, violent supporters to march to the Capitol, and they did. They killed a police officer too btw

*Peacefully and Patriotic were the words Trump used. That's not to incite riots in my mind. You believe in made up lies by the lunatic idiots of the left-wing dummies. Is Maxine Waters your example of being nice? Good Lord.

 

[VolStrom]

I'm half ass watching this trial and so far I've see the prosecutor deliver what I thought was his closing arguments and then the defense attorney give his closing arguments. So why am I seeing the prosecution standing up and rebutting the defense attorney? I've been on 4 jury trials before and never seen this level of crap.

 

[Tastylicks]

*Peacefully and Patriotic were the words Trump used. That's not to incite riots in my mind. You believe in made up lies by the lunatic idiots of the left-wing dummies. Is Maxine Waters your example of being nice? Good Lord.

No I dont like what Waters said either but hey... ya'll let trump get away with inciting a riot so the precedent has been set, politicians can do/say whatever they want

 

[Tastylicks]

I'm half ass watching this trial and so far I've see the prosecutor deliver what I thought was his closing arguments and then the defense attorney give his closing arguments. So why am I seeing the prosecution standing up and rebutting the defense attorney? I've been on 4 jury trials before and never seen this level of crap.

4 jury trials? its already been said in this thread that only idiots serve on juries lol

 

[NEO]

I watched him incite the riot with my own eyes. He told his adoring, violent supporters to march to the Capitol, and they did. They killed a police officer too btw

The officer who died is named Brian Sicknick.

He died of a stroke and natural causes.

You may wanna check the public autopsy.

Again, facts are facts.

Nobody killed him.

You need to stop making stuff up on here.

You may want to LEARN how he actually died.

 

[VolStrom]

4 jury trials? its already been said in this thread that only idiots serve on juries lol

Well since it's been said in this thread, it is written. At least I'm willing unlike vermon like you that take the chance to serve on a jury as evil.

 

[Tastylicks]

The officer who died is named Brian Sicknick.

He died of a stroke and natural causes.

You may wanna check the public autopsy.

Again, facts are facts.

Nobody killed him.

You need to stop making stuff up on here.

You may want to LEARN how he actually died.

Officer Sicknick would have died anyway if he wasn't engaged in protecting the government of the United States against an angry mob?

ya'll need to stop with the 'blue lives matter' stuff. clearly its a fraud

 

[VolStrom]

Officer Sicknick would have died anyway if he wasn't engaged in protecting the government of the United States against an angry mob?

ya'll need to stop with the 'blue lives matter' stuff. clearly its a fraud

Do you own any guns?

 

[Tastylicks]

Well since it's been said in this thread, it is written. At least I'm willing unlike vermon like you that take the chance to serve on a jury as evil.

not evil. just really, really sucky

 

[Tastylicks]

Do you own any guns?

no

 

[hUTch2002]

It takes a lot to get the Court of Appeals to overturn a jury verdict in a criminal case.

Yep but I bet it’ll be attempted if need be.

 

[dovervolz]

4 jury trials? its already been said in this thread that only idiots serve on juries lol

You must get to serve on a lot of juries then.

 

[NEO]

Officer Sicknick would have died anyway if he wasn't engaged in protecting the government of the United States against an angry mob?

ya'll need to stop with the 'blue lives matter' stuff. clearly its a fraud

You made a statement as if it was fact: killed. Murder is a felony yet no one is being charged with murder here.

Now you go to guessing when I call you out because you got caught in a lie.

This forum may not be for you. You are going to get humiliated.

 

[hUTch2002]

Is what part of what?

Are closing arguments part of the trial or not? Is it part of what the jury will consider? They’re more important than anything as it’s the most fresh. Granted, if the defense had the ability to discredit a witness sooner and didn’t then shame on them.

 

[bamawriter]

Yep but I bet it’ll be attempted if need be.

I'm sure they'll appeal. But that doesn't really mean much. Lots of cases get appealed for one reason or another.

 

[Tastylicks]

You made a statement as if it was fact: killed. Murder is a felony yet no one is being charged with murder here.

yep, its an injustice and a slap in the face to Officer Sicknick's family

 

[bamawriter]

Are closing arguments part of the trial or not? Is it part of what the jury will consider? They’re more important than anything as it’s the most fresh. Granted, if the defense had the ability to discredit a witness sooner and didn’t then shame on them.

They matter in the sense that they are the "last word" so to speak. Though the defense doesn't get the last word, as the State goes last, so they get a chance to rebutt that the defense doesn't get.

However, the big issue is that they're really just reframing information provided on the stand. The jurors still have the ability to recall that the actual examination of the witness didn't go quite as the defense tried to present it in closing.

 

[NEO]

yep, its an injustice and a slap in the face to Officer Sicknick's family

How the hell do you charge anyone with a stroke?

 

[C-south]

no

 

[Tastylicks]

How the hell do you charge anyone with a stroke?

you dont. you charge them with murder for killing him. I guess 'blue lives' just dont matter to ya