Ttucke11
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,540
- Likes
- 8,163
Does your marketing team often find themselves making life and death decisions?The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
How many police yearly mistakenly shoot someone? You’re more likely to get a grand piano dropped on your headI agree with most of this, including that it’s not about race. I say appearance (of which race is a factor), but if the differences justify the disparity, then end police practices that put police in dangerous, nonexigent situations.
If a traffic stop for a broken taillight is legitimately so dangerous that a police officer’s innate fear might cause them to panic and mistakenly shoot someone, then quit primarily relying on pretextual traffic stops for drug interdiction. Just keep police out of that dangerous situation. Particularly if the community that you’re “protecting” from a zip of weed doesn’t want to be protected that way.
The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
It’s not that at all. We can critique other officers all day and I will if they break the law or do something egregious from a training standpoint, but most laypeople who comment as critics on FB or on here don’t have a clear understanding of police training, tactics, law or anything to have an educated opinion on the subject. Hell in the justified shooting in Columbus thread there was a “why didn’t the officer shoot her in leg or taze her?”The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
It’s not that at all. We can critique other officers all day and I will if they break the law or do something egregious from a training standpoint, but most laypeople who comment as critics on FB or on here don’t have a clear understanding of police training, tactics, law or anything to have an educated opinion on the subject. Hell in the justified shooting in Columbus thread there was a “why didn’t the officer shoot her in leg or taze her?”
it’s hard to take the opinions of people ignorant on the topic at hand seriously
The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
I want to see you defend this nonsense. You attempt to pretend that you base your opinions in objective logic.
So go ahead. Explain how 2nd degree murder is the appropriate charge?
Why do people waste so much time arguing to make sure every detail is said exactly the way they see fit? Why waste anytime worrying about Chauvin?
You're not understanding the tweets. The "reverse verdict" wouldn't be guilty, guilty, not guilty, it would be not guilty, not guilty, not guilty.
I thought that as well. When assault entered the prosecutions closing argument, that sets bad precedence I would think. Like you said every thug they arrest is gonna scream 'assault'. Oh well, it's Minnesota's problem... for now.This is where the defense failed in winning the jury instruction argument and failed in presenting almost no case about assault intent. The assault intent was glossed over in the jury instructions allowing far wider latitude than what's written in Minnesota law. Chauvin is a POS cop and guilty but every criminal will cry assault when restrained and this woke jury just gave them a free ticket to $$$ settlements. I hope the murder convictions are overturned.
That's wrong. Plennnnty of people argued Chauvin was innocent
My issue is simple. You appear to be defending what is an obvious wrong verdict.
Are you saying you agree the verdict was wrong?
How am I defending the verdict? What would make you think I am saying the verdict is wrong or exactly right? Nothing I have said is in relation to that.
Why are you trying to rope me into this conversation that I just said is a waste of time? You missed the point of the tweet. I've told you before that I don't care about the specifics of this case nor did I pay attention to it, and it's specifically for this reason. You want to argue about pointless **** in defense of somebody who is not worthy of defending. Go be a contrarian for the sake of somebody worth defending.
It's the same thing for the victims. It's never a criminal that gets shot in their mindset. It's some innocent boy riding his bicycle back after robbing the local store. Look at the knife case, she was clearly about to stab another person, but it's the cops fault...The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
I saw posters arguing intent vs negligence.That's wrong. Plennnnty of people argued Chauvin was innocent and/or just following proper procedures
Why waste time on either one? It appears that Floyd was an oxygen thief and Chauvin an utter moron undeserving of the responsibility he had.Why do people waste so much time arguing to make sure every detail is said exactly the way they see fit? Why waste anytime worrying about Chauvin?
You're not understanding the tweets. The "reverse verdict" wouldn't be guilty, guilty, not guilty, it would be not guilty, not guilty, not guilty.
The biggest thing (worst thing) is that police officers take it so personal when someone else in their field is bad at their jobs.
For example, random police officers all over the country rushed to Chauvin's defense or that lady with the taser's defense as if its impossible for another police officer to simply be bad at their jobs...
Why is that? Are they so engaged in a culture war they lose common sense?
-
I work in marketing & sales. If a marketing assistant in Minnesota kills someone at her work, I'm not digging in saying "well it must be the victim's fault!" hell no, that bitch shouldn't have killed someone, I'm on board with that and its easy
Why waste time on either one? It appears that Floyd was an oxygen thief and Chauvin an utter moron undeserving of the responsibility he had.