Disney: The Most Evil Business In The World

[luthervol]

Can we get an estimate from you on how long you anticipate said „gradual repairs“ should take?

80% repaired within 10 years.
95% repaired within 20 years.

Of course, some of that is dependent on how successful the right-wing propaganda machine is in keeping the country divided.
If the PF was a representative sample (and thank god it's not), I would say the repair would take at least 30 years.

 

[Vol423]

80% repaired within 10 years.
95% repaired within 20 years.

Of course, some of that is dependent on how successful the right-wing propaganda machine is in keeping the country divided.
If the PF was a representative sample (and thank god it's not), I would say the repair would take at least 30 years.

It's quite hilarious that you claim that right-wing propaganda is dividing the country.

 

[luthervol]

How so? By allowing millions to invade? By allowing China to become an enormous threat in the world? By allowing Putin to run wild and invade a sovereign nation? By canceling energy independence on day 1?

Oh... but your brain donor doesn't hurt anyone's feelings.

It's funny that you said that it would be a good day when 'the adults were in charge'. What's also funny is that you act like a 5 year old because your little feelings got hurt by the bad orange man and want him thrown out. Neville Chamberlain would have been a star in your world.

The whole "hurt feelings" "mean tweets" angle is ridiculous. Anyone using that angle, should at least be able to reverse the situation and realize that, by their own admission, Trump threw it all away because he was not able to control his childish and despicable nature.

But then that would force them into the next layer of thought; which is..........Trump could have controlled it.....he chose not to....that was his strategy......because he Bannon/Stone knew that's precisely what charged his base.

And that tells you all you need to know.

 

[luthervol]

It's quite hilarious that you claim that right-wing propaganda is dividing the country.

It's the whole focus of right-wing propaganda. It was the Bannon/Trump strategy from day one.
"The other side are not our friends, they're our enemy, and this is war. We defeat the other side, not work with them."

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

The whole "hurt feelings" "mean tweets" angle is ridiculous. Anyone using that angle, should at least be able to reverse the situation and realize that, by their own admission, Trump threw it all away because he was not able to control his childish and despicable nature.

But then that would force them into the next layer of thought; which is..........Trump could have controlled it.....he chose not to....that was his strategy......because he Bannon/Stone knew that's precisely what charged his base.

And that tells you all you need to know.

lol...

I have said before that Trump acted childish at times. But his policies were solid.
At least you admit that you chose feelings over policy. Thanks for that.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

It's the whole focus of right-wing propaganda. It was the Bannon/Trump strategy from day one.
"The other side are not our friends, they're our enemy, and this is war. We defeat the other side, not work with them."

It actually started with your boy Obama and the Hildabeast, but don't let those facts get in your way either.

 

[Lawrence Wright]

Whoever posted Universal is a bigger draw in Central Florida that Disney is misinformed.

 

[OrangeTsar]

80% repaired within 10 years.
95% repaired within 20 years.

Of course, some of that is dependent on how successful the right-wing propaganda machine is in keeping the country divided.
If the PF was a representative sample (and thank god it's not), I would say the repair would take at least 30 years.

So by your logic and timeline, I could similarly claim with some justification that Trump‘s entire term was not his responsibility as he was „gradually repairing“ the damage from Obama (and even Clinton)?

 

[luthervol]

It actually started with your boy Obama and the Hildabeast, but don't let those facts get in your way either.

Well, those aren't facts. It actually started with right-wing talk radio.

 

[OrangeTsar]

It's the whole focus of right-wing propaganda. It was the Bannon/Trump strategy from day one.
"The other side are not our friends, they're our enemy, and this is war. We defeat the other side, not work with them."

Oh, i Must have missed the part where you explained how the Democrats calling us „Nazis, racists, fascists, bigots, KKK members, homophobes, transphobes, and white suprematists“ was not seeing us as enemies instead of friends?

 

[luthervol]

So by your logic and timeline, I could similarly claim with some justification that Trump‘s entire term was not his responsibility as he was „gradually repairing“ the damage from Obama (and even Clinton)?

I don't understand your question. Every president attempts to change or improve on things inherited from the previous administration(s).

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Well, those aren't facts. It actually started with right-wing talk radio.

Nope. Obama rubbed it in McCain's face that 'elections have consequences' and showed his true colors as a man who had zero desire to compromise. The rest of you were so butthurt after Hillary got beat that you have gone full scorched earth on everybody that doesn't toe your party line.

All talk radio did was to point it out because the complicit leftist media sure as hell wasn't going to

 

[OrangeTsar]

Nope. Obama rubbed it in McCain's face that 'elections have consequences' and showed his true colors as a man who had zero desire to compromise. The rest of you were so butthurt after Hillary got beat that you have gone full scorched earth on everybody that doesn't toe your party line.

All talk radio did was to point it out because the complicit leftist media sure as hell wasn't going to

Obama also was the one who lit the fuse on the whole anti-cop and BLM frenzy. Undoing five decades worth of racial healing in order to sow division and solidify minority votes.

 

[luthervol]

Oh, i Must have missed the part where you explained how the Democrats calling us „Nazis, racists, fascists, bigots, KKK members, homophobes, transphobes, and white suprematists“ was not seeing us as enemies instead of friends?

Anyone using those terms when referencing the whole republican party would be wrong. They should do better. All other things being similar, I always vote for the least divisive in the primaries. People who voted for Trump in the 2016 primaries, knowingly and intentionally voted for the most divisive person out of 17 choices.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Anyone using those terms when referencing the whole republican party would be wrong. They should do better. All other things being similar, I always vote for the least divisive in the primaries. People who voted for Trump in the 2016 primaries, knowingly and intentionally voted for the most divisive person out of 17 choices.

And that was far worse than what we have now.

Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, your side is STILL referring to us as bigots homophobes Nazis etc etc etc

 

[luthervol]

And that was far worse than what we have now.

Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, your side is STILL referring to us as bigots homophobes Nazis etc etc etc

Neither one of us will win a debate on when it got out of hand or who is most guilty.
My stance is and always has been, the country is better off in the long run with more unity, not less.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Neither one of us will win a debate on when it got out of hand or who is most guilty.
My stance is and always has been, the country is better off in the long run with more unity, not less.

Great. Your membership application for the Republican Party is on its way. Welcome

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Neither one of us will win a debate on when it got out of hand or who is most guilty.
My stance is and always has been, the country is better off in the long run with more unity, not less.

And your side started this whole furball. If you don't buy that Soetoro started it, then go back to Harry Reid and the nuclear option. There was ZERO unity in what they were trying to do. NO compromise.

The left wants to cram their (lack of) values down the throats of people that don't share those values thru legislation and Executive Order. How many democratic sponsored judges were voted against by a single democrat? I'll give you all night to research that or I can just spoil it for you and tell you that number is ZERO.

How you can support this is mind boggling.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[OrangeTsar]

And your side started this whole furball. If you don't buy that Soetoro started it, then go back to Harry Reid and the nuclear option. There was ZERO unity in what they were trying to do. NO compromise.

The left wants to cram their (lack of) values down the throats of people that don't share those values thru legislation and Executive Order. How many democratic sponsored judges were voted against by a single democrat? I'll give you all night to research that or I can just spoil it for you and tell you that number is ZERO.

How you can support this is mind boggling.

The Democrats NEVER think a weapon they deploy will ever be used against themselves. But when it inevitably is, they melt down faster than the wicked witch of the West in a carwash

 

[luthervol]

And your side started this whole furball. If you don't buy that Soetoro started it, then go back to Harry Reid and the nuclear option. There was ZERO unity in what they were trying to do. NO compromise.

The left wants to cram their (lack of) values down the throats of people that don't share those values thru legislation and Executive Order. How many democratic sponsored judges were voted against by a single democrat? I'll give you all night to research that or I can just spoil it for you and tell you that number is ZERO.

How you can support this is mind boggling.

You think that maybe the unprecedented republican partisanship played a role in Reid's decision?
At that time, half of the 168 filibusters of executive and judicial nominees in American history had come during the Obama Administration.

Read that again to yourself......slowly......half of all that had ever been used in the history of the Senate

The repubs had a stated policy of obstruction from the minute Obama was elected.

Anyone who attempts to deny that doesn't even deserve to be heard.

 

[OrangeTsar]

…….Anyone who attempts to deny that doesn't even deserve to be heard.

Yup, Luth is Democrating again. Silence the opposition

 

[luthervol]

Yup, Luth is Democrating again. Silence the opposition

Only if you deny irrefutable facts.

 

[OrangeTsar]

You think that maybe the unprecedented republican partisanship played a role in Reid's decision?
At that time, half of the 168 filibusters of executive and judicial nominees in American history had come during the Obama Administration.

Read that again to yourself......slowly......half of all that had ever been used in the history of the Senate

The repubs had a stated policy of obstruction from the minute Obama was elected.

Anyone who attempts to deny that doesn't even deserve to be heard.

Unprecedented partisanship?????
You DO know the totally unprecedented partisan travesty that started the whole judicial wars, right?
Allow me to introduce you to Robert H. Bork

NounEdit
borking (plural borkings)

1. (transitive, intransitive, US, politics, often derogatory) The act of defeating a person's appointment or election, judicial nomination, etc., through a concerted attack on the person's character, background, and philosophy. quotations ▼

 

[OrangeTsar]

Only if you deny irrefutable facts.

Who decides what facts are „irrefutable“? YOU?????