luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,709
- Likes
- 19,757
yeah for the federal government.Were we not talking about trust?
No it's not my second example.wait? is this your second example?
Its the same dang thing, just at a local scale.
inefficient, not well maintained or designed, is a one size fits all standard that usually doesn't work well, destroys local communities, built a system of the government-business feedback loop/chicken egg problem of governments giving preferential treatment to certain contractors, and then receiving bribes back in the form of donations. in some places it may be the egg before the chicken, but only possible because the government is able to force through objectively bad ideas and practices because they are the government.
It was a stupid yes or no question.yeah for the federal government.
its a standalone, yes or no question. you had to come in here and qualify your response, which to me says that your response is probably not very honest. especially when you start throwing out red herrings to avoid the actual question.
If you want to have a different discussion start your own thread or find a more relevant thread to have that discussion in. Don't get upset when people want to keep the discussion ITT on topic.
Yet they were well aware that it was still more trustworthy than an absence of government.
Seems a little unappreciative of what we have here in terms of standard of living -- sort of like fulmer hate from years ago. We've had it so good we may need a few Kiffin's and Pruitt's to remind us of what we really have.Absolutely. Our federal bureaucrats and politicians are hard working honest people that only want what's best from their subjects.
Seems a little unappreciative of what we have here in terms of standard of living -- sort of like fulmer hate from years ago. We've had it so good we may need a few Kiffin's and Pruitt's to remind us of what we really have.
Many conservatives are fond of saying God was the ultimate author of our constitution, but then support someone like trump who clearly wished to subvert it. Does that mean these conservatives are in rebellion against God?The mistake you and most progressives make is to think that just because someone is well intentioned, they are actually effective. They have already fallen down the slippery slope into hell so they do not notice what the road leading to it was paved with.
The more government there is, the less democracy. Bureaucratic organizations aka the deep state is run by progressives as a job farm. Mind you, many Republicans are not much better in this regard when they get their chance. But that is the whole point. The people are best served not when a Dem is in charge or a Rep is in charge but when people are responsible for their own selves and decisions. He governs best who governs least.
There are certainly things where it is manifestly good to have a representative government act on our collective interests - but those areas are much much much fewer than are currently being addressed.
Other areas of collective benefit - feeding the poor, etc are best addressed through local religious organizations who have the insight and interest to impact the lives of the people they effect. But since most progressives have eschewed a belief in God, you can see why they have replaced it with a fervant worship of the state.
Many conservatives are fond of saying God was the ultimate author of our constitution, but then support someone like trump who clearly wished to subvert it. Does that mean these conservatives are in rebellion against God?
As far as I know, only huff has advocated an anarchistic approach. And,tbh, that's probably not even the full version of his concept.Yet they were well aware that it was still more trustworthy than an absence of government.
No. But there are a significant amount of people here who claim to hate "the government" and consistenty portray it in the worst possible light.As far as I know, only huff has advocated an anarchistic approach. And,tbh, that's probably not even the full version of his concept.
Are there a significant amount of people, here, who extol the virtues of no government or was this a straw man created to agitate?
eta: inviting @n_huffhines to add clarity on my post if he wants.
No. But there are a significant amount of people here who claim to hate "the government" and consistenty portray it in the worst possible light.
I think there is also room for those who "hate the government" because they hate fake, pandering, self serving, lying, entitled, elitist politicians who seem to thumb their nose at our constitution.The vast majority of them are referring to the federal government in its current form. You took it down the rabbit hole of them advocating for no government.
This is where I’m at.The vast majority of them are referring to the federal government in its current form. You took it down the rabbit hole of them advocating for no government.
This is where I’m at.
I don’t really hold any resentment or feel overly frustrated with my local government. I’m not happy with our state government but overall it’s not terrible by any means. A mixed bag for sure.
But the Federal Govt? Nah, they’ve done lost their damn minds! Ironically so has the leader of the Federal Government
I’m probably more anarchistic than most. That does not mean I don’t favor leadership. I am for competent governance by true elites as opposed to the current elites and system that awards very mediocre and corrupt people.As far as I know, only huff has advocated an anarchistic approach. And,tbh, that's probably not even the full version of his concept.
Are there a significant amount of people, here, who extol the virtues of no government or was this a straw man created to agitate?
eta: inviting @n_huffhines to add clarity on my post if he wants.