hmanvolfan
Volmeister extraordinaire
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2004
- Messages
- 103,081
- Likes
- 59,106
He was reported to have had a few rough practices all camp long. Folks like you look at those few reports and assume that means he sucks and out of the race for the job. Not true at all.
After all, it was folks like you that were riding Peterman's back since the UF game last year. Now that he's made some strides, you act you knew he'd be ok all along. :loco: Yeah, sure
Actually, I've been saying all along that he just needs time to adjust to the speed of the game...like Dobbs, and he'll come around. Never said he'd be the starter or anything, but I never considered him "done" (and should transfer) like 98% of VN.which one of us was not saying this about peterman?..i hope he makes me and everyone else on thris site eat crow.
im ready to watch him play.
...for this offense to really thrive. Under normal circumstances, I'd go with seniority/experience....and thus Worley, but Dobbs lets this offense open up, full-throttle.
Was reading this article, by Fox Sports, about Freshmen who could contend for the Heisman.
Cory McCartney: Frosh Perspective: First-year players that could vie for Heisman Trophy | FOX Sports
LSU's Fournette was one of them; Hurd was another. But the problem here is, not only do we have a new front 5 on the OL, but playing Worley allows defenses to really key in on Hurd.
Dobbs is our best chance to keep defenses honest, off balance and always guessing. So, if all things are relatively equal among the QB's, in the passing game....Dobbs has to be the starter.
The way I look at it is this...Dobbs, hands down, looked the best in the Spring. Did he separate himself in practice, before that? Probably not. But, again, in a game environment, he easily looked the best. Give him the starting nod, and if he struggles a lot, then you can put Worley or Peterman in.
Yeah...that's a big laugh, cause we all know that having a mobile QB NEVER makes it tougher on defenses (to have to defend the QB, too). Nick Marshall had 200+yds on us, just as a runner...last year. Just for a little perspective...ANYONE having 200+ yds on the ground is having a HELL of a game. It means between the TB and him, we had no answer. Put an average pocket passer under center, at Auburn, last year, and we likely come away with a win.:lol:
Yeah...that's a big laugh, cause we all know that having a mobile QB NEVER makes it tougher on defenses (to have to defend the QB, too). Nick Marshall had 200+yds on us, just as a runner...last year. Just for a little perspective...ANYONE having 200+ yds on the ground is having a HELL of a game. It means between the TB and him, we had no answer. Put an average pocket passer under center, at Auburn, last year, and we likely come away with a win.
But that doesn't mean anything.![]()
I like a mobile qb as much as anyone but Dobbs isn't close to as good passing wise as Worley or even peterman. His arm strength is terrible and he's no Tim Tebow running the ball so job is Worleys.
...for this offense to really thrive. Under normal circumstances, I'd go with seniority/experience....and thus Worley, but Dobbs lets this offense open up, full-throttle.
Was reading this article, by Fox Sports, about Freshmen who could contend for the Heisman.
Cory McCartney: Frosh Perspective: First-year players that could vie for Heisman Trophy | FOX Sports
LSU's Fournette was one of them; Hurd was another. But the problem here is, not only do we have a new front 5 on the OL, but playing Worley allows defenses to really key in on Hurd.
Dobbs is our best chance to keep defenses honest, off balance and always guessing. So, if all things are relatively equal among the QB's, in the passing game....Dobbs has to be the starter.
The way I look at it is this...Dobbs, hands down, looked the best in the Spring. Did he separate himself in practice, before that? Probably not. But, again, in a game environment, he easily looked the best. Give him the starting nod, and if he struggles a lot, then you can put Worley or Peterman in.