Dominion Sues Powell for $1.3 Billion

#102
#102
VolinWayne said:
Exposure will be good. Let's see how Dominion explains some very mysterious facts

  • Founded in Venezuela in 1997 by a team of three engineers – Antonio Mugica, Alfredo José Anzola, and Roger Piñate, Smartmatic specializes in the design and end-to-end deployment of technology solutions for specific applications.
  • Lou Dobbs on CNN in 2006: Smartmatic based in Venezuela sold to Dominion, top officials in Venezuela –


The link Between Dominion, Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the CCP - GNEWS

4 Things to Know About Voting Machine Company That’s Causing Stir

Step 1 – We all now know that the vast majority of Americans voted on the Canadian-owned DOMINION vote counting machines that are filled with Chinese parts
  • And that the head of Strategy and Security for DOMINION is a member of Antifa
  • And that DOMINION shares office space with George Soros in Toronto at 221 Spadina Avenue Toronto, Ontario – Google Maps
Evidence Grows: ’20 Election Was Rigged – Deep Capture
Click to expand...

Sydney Powell just said you're not a reasonable person. How does it feel to have believed her garbage?

 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54, Septic, Tyler Durden and 1 other person
#103
#103
Yeah a guy who can’t walk up stairs or string coherent sentences together won more counties and secured more total votes than Obama. Keep on believing EL 😂😂😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
#107
#107
BigOrangeTrain said:
Yeah a guy who can’t walk up stairs or string coherent sentences together won more counties and secured more total votes than Obama. Keep on believing EL 😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...
It looks like the actual legal defense for these defamation lawsuits will essentially be "We lied so much and so outlandishly that only an idiot would think it was true." How does that make you feel?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic and volfanhill
#108
#108
Tyler Durden said:
It looks like the actual legal defense for these defamation lawsuits will essentially be "We lied so much and so outlandishly that only an idiot would think it was true." How does that make you feel?
Click to expand...

Doesn’t make me feel anything actually. Biden is president. Trump lost. Was it fair? I have my doubts. Seems like this has been the only election in recent memory where there have been serious issues raised. There was video evidence of shady stuff. Eye witness accounts. Signed affidavits.

I get your perspective though. You hated Trump so because Biden won there was no way anything shady happened. Maybe it didn’t. Yet where there is smoke, there is fire.
 
#111
#111
BigOrangeTrain said:
Doesn’t make me feel anything actually. Biden is president. Trump lost. Was it fair? I have my doubts. Seems like this has been the only election in recent memory where there have been serious issues raised. There was video evidence of shady stuff. Eye witness accounts. Signed affidavits.

I get your perspective though. You hated Trump so because Biden won there was no way anything shady happened. Maybe it didn’t. Yet where there is smoke, there is fire.
Click to expand...
If this was the case wouldn't have 1 court of law considered the Trump teams claims instead of literally all of them being thrown out for no evidence?

If this were the case wouldn't Powell defend herself against a defamation lawsuit with this evidence instead of essentially saying "The people who believed what I said don't have functioning brains" when given the opportunity to do so?

You're living in a fantasy land buddy, I hope you get out of the cult but it appears you're in way too deep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bamawriter
#113
#113
Oh well if it doesn’t get dismissed here’s to hoping she goes scorched earth on every claim. No reason not to. I still think this is all theater.
 
#115
#115
Rasputin_Vol said:
I got that feeling back in late November when they started talking about Hammer and Scorecard. I figured either they really have the goods or they are about to burst into biblical flames.
Click to expand...
Even back then I was saying she better deliver or she’s toast. But she did this to her self. Again well she is in a court room now so go scorched earth I say with the venue she’s got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#116
#116
Tyler Durden said:
If this was the case wouldn't have 1 court of law considered the Trump teams claims instead of literally all of them being thrown out for no evidence?

If this were the case wouldn't Powell defend herself against a defamation lawsuit with this evidence instead of essentially saying "The people who believed what I said don't have functioning brains" when given the opportunity to do so?

You're living in a fantasy land buddy, I hope you get out of the cult but it appears you're in way too deep.
Click to expand...

Why do you equate liking Trump to being in a cult? Do you think I believe he is a god? Do you think I believe everything he says or does is right?
 
#118
#118
BigOrangeTrain said:
Doesn’t make me feel anything actually. Biden is president. Trump lost. Was it fair? I have my doubts. Seems like this has been the only election in recent memory where there have been serious issues raised. There was video evidence of shady stuff. Eye witness accounts. Signed affidavits.

I get your perspective though. You hated Trump so because Biden won there was no way anything shady happened. Maybe it didn’t. Yet where there is smoke, there is fire.
Click to expand...

I think there are court cases where they reviewed some of those signed affidavits and responded by saying they weren't credible because they were hearsay; the affiants didnt actually see what they claimed, they just saw stuff they couldn't explain so they assumed fraud; experts who prepared affidavits didn't meet the basic criteria for experts, etc. If I get a few minutes this week, I'll try to find some links.
 
#119
#119
BigOrangeTrain said:
Why do you equate liking Trump to being in a cult? Do you think I believe he is a god? Do you think I believe everything he says or does is right?
Click to expand...
Why don't you answer the questions I asked? If all this supposed "evidence" exists why would every court of law that it's been presented to throw it out? Why wouldn't this "evidence" be the main line of defense against defamation lawsuits as opposed to, essentially, "the people who believed what we said have no BS detector"?

As to your question, which I answered in a separate thread yesterday and you conveniently forgot about, the remaining Trump supporters have literally built a golden statue in his honor. The remaining Trump supporters believe he was sent by god to save America. The remaining Trump supporters believe anything and everything that comes out of his mouth, no matter how outlandish and obviously false. What am I supposed to think? Do people normally build golden statues out of people they merely like?
 
#120
#120
clarksvol00 said:
I think there are court cases where they reviewed some of those signed affidavits and responded by saying they weren't credible because they were hearsay; the affiants didnt actually see what they claimed, they just saw stuff they couldn't explain so they assumed fraud; experts who prepared affidavits didn't meet the basic criteria for experts, etc. If I get a few minutes this week, I'll try to find some links.
Click to expand...

That’s certainly valid points. But it does seem awful strange that all these issues just came up in this most recent election. And it just so happens that this election was one that saw much more mail in ballots and rule changes for voting. And while I am sure some of the eye witnesses and affidavits were bunk, does that necessarily mean ALL of them were? Seems unlikely.

I mean Obama was one of the most popular presidents in recent memory. Yet we are being led to believe a guy who barely came out of his bunker and campaign, got that many more votes than Obama did? If you don’t at least question that then you have problems.
 
#121
#121
Tyler Durden said:
Why don't you answer the questions I asked? If all this supposed "evidence" exists why would every court of law that it's been presented to throw it out? Why wouldn't this "evidence" be the main line of defense against defamation lawsuits as opposed to, essentially, "the people who believed what we said have no BS detector"?

As to your question, which I answered in a separate thread yesterday and you conveniently forgot about, the remaining Trump supporters have literally built a golden statue in his honor. The remaining Trump supporters believe he was sent by god to save America. The remaining Trump supporters believe anything and everything that comes out of his mouth, no matter how outlandish and obviously false. What am I supposed to think? Do people normally build golden statues out of people they merely like?
Click to expand...

I am a remaining Trump supporter and believe none of that. and I know plenty more that believe the same way. So your categorizations of Trump supporters is based on flawed logic. You are confusing Trump supporters with fringe Q people. Therefore your arguments are rendered moot.
 
#122
#122
BigOrangeTrain said:
That’s certainly valid points. But it does seem awful strange that all these issues just came up in this most recent election. And it just so happens that this election was one that saw much more mail in ballots and rule changes for voting. And while I am sure some of the eye witnesses and affidavits were bunk, does that necessarily mean ALL of them were? Seems unlikely.

I mean Obama was one of the most popular presidents in recent memory. Yet we are being led to believe a guy who barely came out of his bunker and campaign, got that many more votes than Obama did? If you don’t at least question that then you have problems.
Click to expand...

Trump was very polarizing. lots of people can turn up to vote against someone rather than support the opposition. Even more with relaxed mail-in voting laws. It doesn't mean there's fraud, hell, it doesn't mean there's not, but you can also question the fact that Trump was screaming fraud well before the election and wonder if this was exactly his plan if he lost.

The fact that Trump let Sydney Powell run with this stuff then brought her into the White House to consult after she'd been booted from his legal team should raise some eyebrows about his genuine motives.
Edit: changed "beyond the election" to "before"
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
#123
#123
evillawyer said:
Sydney Powell just said you're not a reasonable person. How does it feel to have believed her garbage?

Click to expand...


67c.gif
 
#125
#125
clarksvol00 said:
Trump was very polarizing. lots of people can turn up to vote against someone rather than support the opposition. Even more with relaxed mail-in voting laws. It doesn't mean there's fraud, hell, it doesn't mean there's not, but you can also question the fact that Trump was screaming fraud well before the election and wonder if this was exactly his plan if he lost.

The fact that Trump let Sydney Powell run with this stuff then brought her into the White House to consult after she'd been booted from his legal team should raise some eyebrows about his genuine motives.
Edit: changed "beyond the election" to "before"
Click to expand...

What wonder? He telegraphed. LOL. He was smart enough - he knew his Covid non plan was costing him the election. He declared if he lost it was fraud. A couple thousand fools engaged in sedition after he did lose and told them “take the house”. They did. Now the wussies are whining about no organic food they made a mistake. Wussies all just like their bone spur leader.

Trumps a mutt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evillawyer
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top