Dominion Sues Powell for $1.3 Billion

#154
#154
clarksvol00 said:
Anonymous sources? Blasphemy!

Click to expand...

There are many holes in that defense. Sidney Powell's attorneys are saying that she was just giving her opinions, but during her press conferences and appearances on Fox News, she was clearly presenting allegations of election fraud as facts which she would be able to establish with evidence. Also, the argument that it was up to the courts to decide if her allegations were factual, is fundamentally dishonest because she never made the most serious allegation (that Dominion voting systems changed votes from Trump to Biden) when given the chance to in court. How were the courts going to decide something which was never alleged?
 
#155
#155
BowlBrother85 said:
There are many holes in that defense. Sidney Powell's attorneys are saying that she was just giving her opinions, but during her press conferences and appearances on Fox News, she was clearly presenting allegations of election fraud as facts which she would be able to establish with evidence. Also, the argument that it was up to the courts to decide if her allegations were factual, is fundamentally dishonest because she never made the most serious allegation (that Dominion voting systems changed votes from Trump to Biden) when given the chance to in court. How were the courts going to decide something which was never alleged?
Click to expand...

Great, let the lawsuit proceed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#165
#165
BowlBrother85 said:
There are many holes in that defense. Sidney Powell's attorneys are saying that she was just giving her opinions, but during her press conferences and appearances on Fox News, she was clearly presenting allegations of election fraud as facts which she would be able to establish with evidence. Also, the argument that it was up to the courts to decide if her allegations were factual, is fundamentally dishonest because she never made the most serious allegation (that Dominion voting systems changed votes from Trump to Biden) when given the chance to in court. How were the courts going to decide something which was never alleged?
Click to expand...

her defense was to make the Plaintiffs case for them. Trump only hired the best and brightest. LOL
 
#166
#166
PointGuard said:
her defense was to make the Plaintiffs case for them. Trump only hired the best and brightest. LOL
Click to expand...
It's a defense that the National Enquirer has used in the past when they have been sued for defamation or libel. It's the "nobody takes me seriously" defense. It seems strange for an accomplished lawyer to be resorting to that.
 
#167
#167
BowlBrother85 said:
That is an extraordinary admission. She is making two significant statements with this legal strategy of hers, and they both call her integrity into question:

1) It confirms what we have speculated about since November. Sidney Powell would make claims of election fraud on Fox News and during press conferences that she wouldn't make in court. That is because she knew they weren't true, and she didn't want to risk her license to practice law over those false claims.

2) Sidney Powell is also admitting that she took Trump supporters and Fox News for a ride, and that is probably because she doesn't respect their intellect. She knows that most Trump supporters do believe those claims (look at the posts to this forum). Basically, she doesn't consider the majority of Trump's supporters to be "reasonable". She thinks they will believe anything which advances Trump's agenda, and so she told them what they wanted to hear. It bought her a lot of air time on the Fox News prime time opinion shows, and she enjoyed the attention. That is what this all boils down to.
Click to expand...
Based on her outrageous claims and her presenting zero evidence to substantiate them..... coupled with her most recent claims... I think she might be crazy
 
#168
#168
BowlBrother85 said:
I agree, it should... and do you remember how much respect she was given from your buddies on here in November and December? She is now basically calling them out as idiots for trusting her.
Click to expand...
I remember one in particular who scoffed when I called her a liar.
 
#172
#172
BowlBrother85 said:
It's a defense that the National Enquirer has used in the past when they have been sued for defamation or libel. It's the "nobody takes me seriously" defense. It seems strange for an accomplished lawyer to be resorting to that.
Click to expand...

It recently worked for Tucker Carlson and his trash commentary
 
#173
#173
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top