Duke Crews and Ramar Smith Dismissed

#152
#152
It's the University's falt for that. Drugs are illegal, right? So, why do they let it slide? If they enforced more punishment on drugs than we probably wouldn't see half as much of this crap.
 
#154
#154
VolinArizona said:
I'll also throw this out, and anybody who attended UT can agree or disagree: 80%+ of football and basketball players at UT smoke weed.

If you want to dog on Crews for smoking the ganj - be my guest. But don't minimize his other REAL accomplishments because you're biased against potheads.
Click to expand...
You mean biased against repeat offenders of a simple rule? Maybe going through a life-threatening situation could have put his priorities in order. I guess not.
 
#155
#155
justingroves said:
Probably not. We aren't a bunch of high school jock sniffers.

Thanks for your valuable insight on Ramar.
Click to expand...


LOL....I love it when someone says that as if it's somehow a burn. I couldn't be happier to scout basketball as a profession...sure beats workin at the factory.

mm
 
#156
#156
NEW COACH said:
It's the University's falt for that. Drugs are illegal, right? So, why do they let it slide? If they enforced more punishment on drugs than we probably wouldn't see half as much of this crap.
Click to expand...
Are you stoned yourself or just extremely naive?
 
#157
#157
NEW COACH said:
It's the University's falt for that. Drugs are illegal, right? So, why do they let it slide? If they enforced more punishment on drugs than we probably wouldn't see half as much of this crap.
Click to expand...

Maybe they a) realize people make mistakes (if you even want to call it that) or b) don't see marijuana as a major issue. But that is a debate for another thread.
 
#158
#158
NEW COACH said:
It's the University's falt for that. Drugs are illegal, right? So, why do they let it slide? If they enforced more punishment on drugs than we probably wouldn't see half as much of this crap.
Click to expand...

When I first learned the definition of "rhetoric," I was glad I knew the real meaning. Because now I can say this: you lack rhetoric.
 
#160
#160
toxicdonut said:
You mean biased against repeat offenders of a simple rule? Maybe going through a life-threatening situation could have put his priorities in order. I guess not.
Click to expand...

You're missing my entire point. Go find where I said he shouldn't have been punished and that it wasn't stupid. You won't find it.

However, he had a serious heart condition and DID have to fight through physical, and mostly mental, hurdles. No matter what he does the rest of his life, the above sentence is true.
 
#162
#162
toxicdonut said:
You mean biased against repeat offenders of a simple rule? Maybe going through a life-threatening situation could have put his priorities in order. I guess not.
Click to expand...
I agree it should have but sometimes young people believe they're bullet proof.
 
#163
#163
Marc Maggard said:
First...who told you it was weed?

Second...who told you it was ONE failed test...

mm
Click to expand...

First, try to follow the conversation. I wasn't talking about Ramar or Duke Crews

Second, see "First"

EDIT: When I say "try to follow the conversation," I'm not being a smarta$$. It's hard to follow because of NEW COACH.
 
#167
#167
scottyhopsonjpgjw6.jpg




He better be or we're in trouble.
 
#168
#168
VolinArizona said:
First, try to follow the conversation. I wasn't talking about Ramar or Duke Crews

Second, see "First"

EDIT: When I say "try to follow the conversation," I'm not being a smarta$$. It's hard to follow because of NEW COACH.
Click to expand...

I didn't say you were talking about ramar or duke. You said that the university doesn't discipline after 1 failed test...

I WAS THEN referring back to Ramar and Crews.

mm
 
#172
#172
Marc Maggard said:
I didn't say you were talking about ramar or duke. You said that the university doesn't discipline after 1 failed test...

I WAS THEN referring back to Ramar and Crews.

mm
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? I told NEW COACH that I know his favorite players has smoked weed before.

Then he said "They test these guys"

To which I replied "Yes, but they don't punish after 1 failed test." Thusly, even if his favorite player failed a test, we might not know it ever happened.
 
#175
#175
VolinArizona said:
What are you talking about? I told NEW COACH that I know his favorite players has smoked weed before.

Then he said "They test these guys"

To which I replied "Yes, but they don't punish after 1 failed test." Thusly, even if his favorite player failed a test, we might not know it ever happened.
Click to expand...


right...to which I was pointing out (trying to clue you in) that this issue with Ramar/Duke may not have been the first, dealing with weed, or even a UT given test.

mm
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top