Econ 101 for Presidential Candidates (and VN) - CATO

#176
#176
midnight orange said:
Yeah that's why we had Bernie Madoff, Enron, WorldCom, Fannie Mae, Health south, Tyco,etc. Btw, what was the name of that company that was selling lead poisoned water to the citizens of Flint, MI? Tell us about the SEC having knowledge of the house of cards the banks were sitting on alleviating the 2008 financial crises. How about the savings & loans debacle in the 80's?
Click to expand...

I didn't say it protects, I said it helps protect.
 
#179
#179
Orangedogsrule said:
The fricking article makes
the case very well. The fricking NAP falls apart in the real world. But you. You want to live in looney toon land where Mizes is bowed down to each night.

The effing NAP is an effing non starter. Your whole jizz about my issue with stopping conscienceless sociopaths (monsters) from abusing, using, & ruining who ever and when ever they can can not nor ever can be adequately be addressed by the NAP



I'm a consertive leaning centrist by every possible measure. Say I don't understand the NAP and then call me a socialist. AS IF you really understand.



I won't even give you any satisfaction on this one. Go down to your local small business incubator and ask them why we have business liscenses.

And I know I damn sure oppose your definition of free markets.



So your were so angstery that you quit right there? Oooo yeah, sooo sorry. Hadta get a licence and that was the end of that.
Click to expand...

The NAP does not prohibit self defense. So some people being monsters is irrelevant. That will occur regardless. So yes, the NAP can address monsters.

Had to invest 10,000 for which you would receive 0 return. Because Orange dog and the other socialist believe government should control someone's business.
 
#182
#182
BigOrangeTrain said:
I dont think you're angry. Clueless yes. Angry, no. Your idea of a borderless, lawless drug addled society reminds me of a George Orwell novel.
Click to expand...


Ever heard the saying about how if you don't open your mouth people won't know how dumb you are?

1984 was about the type of security over freedom society that you and so many others are advocating
 
#188
#188
Vol8188 said:
This is your style. You show up. Make 0 points. Insult others and declare victory. It's truly pathetic
Click to expand...
Yeah maybe. But your pathway is truly idiotic. Your 'ideas' might work in a a classroom, but most people live in the real world. Even theoretically for the most part your 'ideas' are moronic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#189
#189
SpaceCoastVol said:
Yeah maybe. But your pathway is truly idiotic. Your 'ideas' might work in a a classroom, but most people live in the real world. Even theoretically for the most part your 'ideas' are moronic.
Click to expand...

If they're so absurd, you should have an easy time explaining why. I'll wait....
 
#190
#190
Vol8188 said:
If they're so absurd, you should have an easy time explaining why. I'll wait....
Click to expand...
These things have been explained to you over and over. It is not worth my time. What is really scary is that you are a teacher, shaping young minds.


Now the millenial problem is starting to make sense.
 
#191
#191
SpaceCoastVol said:
These things have been explained to you over and over. It is not worth my time. What is really scary is that you are a teacher, shaping young minds.


Now the millenial problem is starting to make sense.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Because I spend the entire day in my math class explaining to students why immigration laws only serve to limit free market capitalism.

Go ahead if it's so simple. Explain.

So far I've just been told "we are a nation of laws!" "Do you leave your door open!" and "some people are bad".
 
#192
#192
200.gif
 
#196
#196
FLVOL69 said:
You're hopeless dude
Click to expand...

Because I told you that your "do you lock your doors" argument is irrelevant? Advocating for open borders does not in any way limit your property rights. It actually increases your property rights. Like your right to have guest from another nation or to rent your property to immigrants. No one is claiming they should be allowed to legally break into your home.
 
#198
#198
Vol8188 said:
Because I told you that your "do you lock your doors" argument is irrelevant? Advocating for open borders does not in any way limit your property rights. It actually increases your property rights. Like your right to have guest from another nation or to rent your property to immigrants. No one is claiming they should be allowed to legally break into your home.
Click to expand...

When's the last time a home invader broke in legally? You just increase the odds of such an attack by allowing unfettered access. I'm done sparky..
 
#199
#199
FLVOL69 said:
When's the last time a home invader broke in legally? You just increase the odds of such an attack by allowing unfettered access. I'm done sparky..
Click to expand...

Then don't allow access to your property, that's your right. But you have no right to tell me who can and cannot access mine.

You fear of immigrants is irrelevant. Milliions of Americans want to hire and/or rent to them and you have no right to tell those people what they can or cannot do with their property.
 
#200
#200
Vol8188 said:
Then don't allow access to your property, that's your right. But you have no right to tell me who can and cannot access mine.

You fear of immigrants is irrelevant. Milliions of Americans want to hire and/or rent to them and you have no right to tell those people what they can or cannot do with their property.
Click to expand...

We do if they're illegal, how about we start with getting the millions of Americans employed first?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top