tumscalcium
Ano ba!
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 25,487
- Likes
- 21,315
CIA employee
Anybody still think Snowden should have used "proper internal procedures" to blow the whistle on these thugs?
He'd be in Gitmo or get disappeared.
CIA employee
Anybody still think Snowden should have used "proper internal procedures" to blow the whistle on these thugs?
I don't recall saying the 2nd was specifically meant for the government...but I'll bite.
If Snowden had come out and said "I have information about domestic spying by the Federal Government and here it is" in one fail swoop, I'd be okay with that. But when he continues to pop up in the news to include things like this:
http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/218963-troubling-more-wikileaks.html
It's pure attention grabbing tactics. There comes a point where he crossed the line between concerned whistle blower and (God I hate to say I agree with LG) a narcissist. If he had just dropped the info at once and let the chips fall, I'd be good with it. But he continues to pop up from time to time and one has to ask the question of "why?"
I think how he released/releases the information is the least important part of this. I don't care if he plans to do a 100 part miniseries on A&E. The only thing I care about is that he did the right thing.
Can one question and motives and character based on some of his decisions? Absolutely.
Does that change the fact that he ultimately did the right thing, and protected millions? Not in my opinion.
He also had classified information that hadn't been released yet on his home computer.
This is an apples and oranges case here.
I don't recall saying the 2nd was specifically meant for the government...but I'll bite.
If Snowden had come out and said "I have information about domestic spying by the Federal Government and here it is" in one fail swoop, I'd be okay with that. But when he continues to pop up in the news to include things like this:
http://www.volnation.com/forum/politics/218963-troubling-more-wikileaks.html
It's pure attention grabbing tactics. There comes a point where he crossed the line between concerned whistle blower and (God I hate to say I agree with LG) a narcissist. If he had just dropped the info at once and let the chips fall, I'd be good with it. But he continues to pop up from time to time and one has to ask the question of "why?"
Yeah because being in prison for the rest of your life is fun an all. I don't have any negative feelings towards this guy. None of us are smart enough to do his job and none of you can say what he should've done. We now know what they are doing now and the guy isn't dead or in jail. I'd say that's the best situation if you are him.
If it had been illegal then he would have been charged. Do you think CIA guys only deal with classified info at the office? They released that info to discredit him and he most likely can't say a thing about it if it is classified without going to jail.
In accordance with the law and concerning the release of classified information, yes. Unless they happen to have a secure computer in a properly prepared storage area with electronic controls, yes, the office happens to be where this kind of stuff stays.
I'm always impressed that nearly every single person on VN who claims to support the 2nd amendment "to protect ourselves from the government", can at the same time refer to this man who literally protected millions from the government, as a traitor.
How can those two feelings coexist? Would you guys like him more if he had shot a couple of people?
Again, if what he did was illegal then he would have been charged.
Yeah because being in prison for the rest of your life is fun an all. I don't have any negative feelings towards this guy. None of us are smart enough to do his job and none of you can say what he should've done. We now know what they are doing now and the guy isn't dead or in jail. I'd say that's the best situation if you are him.
Best situation for him?
He is in jail, so to speak. If he continues to live in the freedom rich Russia, he will never see his family again. If a loved ones dies, he can not come home to attend the funeral. He has chosen to walk off, betray his countries secretes to foreign nations. If he comes home he will be prosecuted as he should be. He is a fugitive and a traitor on the run.
Best situation for him?
He is in jail, so to speak. If he continues to live in the freedom rich Russia, he will never see his family again. If a loved ones dies, he can not come home to attend the funeral. He has chosen to walk off, betray his countries secretes to foreign nations. If he comes home he will be prosecuted as he should be. He is a fugitive and a traitor on the run.
Best situation for him?
He is in jail, so to speak. If he continues to live in the freedom rich Russia, he will never see his family again. If a loved ones dies, he can not come home to attend the funeral. He has chosen to walk off, betray his countries secretes to foreign nations. If he comes home he will be prosecuted as he should be. He is a fugitive and a traitor on the run.
(God I hate to say I agree with LG)"
Best situation for him?
He is in jail, so to speak. If he continues to live in the freedom rich Russia, he will never see his family again. If a loved ones dies, he can not come home to attend the funeral. He has chosen to walk off, betray his countries secretes to foreign nations. If he comes home he will be prosecuted as he should be. He is a fugitive and a traitor on the run.
Yes, but by all means, let's let people who are entrusted with Government secrets decided when and who they are going to divulge that info toCIA employee
Anybody still think Snowden should have used "proper internal procedures" to blow the whistle on these thugs?
I'm always impressed that nearly every single person on VN who claims to support the 2nd amendment "to protect ourselves from the government", can at the same time refer to this man who literally protected millions from the government, as a traitor.
How can those two feelings coexist? Would you guys like him more if he had shot a couple of people?
Easy, when you are charged with information that the Government deems secret or classified, you don't have the liberty of deciding who to release that information to. If he wasn't charged with that information in an official manner, I'd be 100% ok with him releasing it.
Washington Compost, real credible source there.