Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 45,975
- Likes
- 43,347
Among the more nefarious procedures the feds have engaged in is something called "parallel reconstruction." This procedure seeks to hide the true and original source of information about a criminal defendant when it was obtained unlawfully.
Like those avenues would have done anything. The govt is aware of what they are doing. What he did needed to be done.
Here's the scariest part of all of this:
So many idiots demand Snowden be brought to justice...
How many people have demanded the officials who authorized this constitutional violation be charged with treason?
It's not up to him to decide that. So, I should be able to release any TSS/Secret/classified info I have if I disagree with the way the Government is handling it? Or if I think its unfair to the citizens? Of course not, there's a reason that we safeguard our information and only certain people are cleared to be privy to that info.
It's not up to him to decide that. So, I should be able to release any TSS/Secret/classified info I have if I disagree with the way the Government is handling it? Or if I think its unfair to the citizens? Of course not, there's a reason that we safeguard our information and only certain people are cleared to be privy to that info.
I have clearly stated that the officials who authorized this should face justice as well. Doesnt absolve Snowden though.
1. US government violates its constitutional agreement with the people.
2. The US government then asks everyone to keep quite about it and has them sign a memorandum saying they won't speak about it.
Replace "US government" with anyone and replace constitution with "law". Then tell me what court this would hold up in?
I like giving you a hard time. I'm sure you served honorably and I'm not making light of that. I do think that people who have served sometimes prove a little bit too trusting if government or want to follow protocol as they have been taught to do so.First off, you can stfu about my military background or about what I did or didnt do.
Secondly, not one bit of that means a thing and doesnt excuse Snowden of not doing exactly what he was charged with doing. Like I have said before, there are several legal avenues to report things and none of those avenues include publicly releasing information....there's no excuse for what he did.
I am in no way absolving the Government from the charge of unconstitutionally monitoring their citizens. I hope the leaders that made that call to authorize that are brought before justice as well. But, this doesnt absolve Snowden or what he did IMO.
I have clearly stated that the officials who authorized this should face justice as well. Doesn't absolve Snowden though.
I like giving you a hard time. I'm sure you served honorably and I'm not making light of that. I do think that people who have served sometimes prove a little bit too trusting if government or want to follow protocol as they have been taught to do so.
So it's okay for the govt to be spying on its citizens without a warrant and with no probable cause?
I like giving you a hard time. I'm sure you served honorably and I'm not making light of that. I do think that people who have served sometimes prove a little bit too trusting if government or want to follow protocol as they have been taught to do so.
Here's what should happen....
End the BS spying on Americans and shady practices (specifically parallel reconstruction and spying on allies).
Go after the people responsible for violating our rights as Americans.
President acknowledges Snowden broke law, but pardon him for being a whistleblower and informing the American people about their corrupt government.
Snowden comes home.
I just don't see how he's hurt any of us, and nobody can seem to give a decent argument that he's hurt us, let alone a satisfactory argument. Why should he face charges?
Yes, be a man and honor what you have sworn an oath to doing.