Orangeburst
Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 46,258
- Likes
- 105,189
Green Inferno: Tesla Model 3 Engulfed in Flames After Hitting Debris on New Jersey Road
View attachment 581243
A 2022 Tesla Model 3 reportedly caught fire and was completely destroyed in Newark, New Jersey, last week after the electric vehicle struck debris on the road.
The electric vehicle started issuing warnings that there was a critical problem shortly after the Tesla hit an object on the road, at which point the driver then pulled over, called authorities, and exited the vehicle before the battery pack started smoking and later erupted in flames, according to a report by InsideEVs.
The outlet noted that the Tesla fire in New Jersey was reminiscent of a vulnerability the EV had when it first launched, in which “multiple vehicles went on fire after striking road debris,” sparking an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Green Inferno: Tesla Model 3 Engulfed in Flames After Hitting Debris on New Jersey Road
A 2022 Tesla Model 3 reportedly caught fire and was completely destroyed in Newark, New Jersey, last week after the electric vehicle struck debris on the road.www.breitbart.com
EV Battery Factory Will Require So Much Energy It Needs A Coal Plant…
A new electric vehicle battery factory in Kansas is demanding so much energy that the state is delaying the retirement of a coal plant to make sure the…cowboystatedaily.com
Tesla's Mega 98-Supercharger Location Runs In Part On A Diesel Generator: Report
Lauded as the largest bank of EV chargers in the world, the Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger has a dirty secretjalopnik.com
Eh a Tesla fan club forum probably isn’t the best Iocation to get your defense. A few posts in it produced this gem.Nope
Harris Ranch superchargers powered by diesel generators??? Really?
Hi folks. Saw this story pop up on my feed. Seems weird. We have been to Harris ranch a number of times and I don’t recall seeing a diesel generator powering the superchargers. Has anyone noticed this? Is it maybe for general back up power for the service station etc? Here’s the link...teslamotorsclub.com
When people say diesel trains, it turns out the diesel is used to run a generator for the train's electric motors.
It doesn't sound intuitive because why not burn the diesel to run the train engines directly instead of going through the hoops of making electricity first to run the train's motors?
It turns out that going through the hoops to run an electric motor is still more efficient than directly burning fuel to run an engine.
One gallon of fuel to go through the hoops generates more miles on the road for EV while that same gallon to burn inside the engine would generate fewer miles for the road.
Nope
Harris Ranch superchargers powered by diesel generators??? Really?
Hi folks. Saw this story pop up on my feed. Seems weird. We have been to Harris ranch a number of times and I don’t recall seeing a diesel generator powering the superchargers. Has anyone noticed this? Is it maybe for general back up power for the service station etc? Here’s the link...teslamotorsclub.com
Yes
Questions remain about how Tesla has sourced power in Calif.
In 2021, Tesla promised it would power all its Supercharger stations with renewable energy; it hasn’t.www.sfgate.com
“I discovered that Tesla’s battery swap station was not in fact being made available to owners who regularly drove between California’s two largest cities,” Niedermeyer wrote in a May 2022 exposé for Slate. “Instead, the company was running diesel generators to power additional Superchargers (the kind that take 30 to 60 minutes to recharge a battery) to handle the holiday rush, their exhaust mingling with the unmistakable smell of bulls—t.”
What if I told you I had pictures, of Elon Musk paying Rudolph Diesel, to piss on him? Would you believe that? Nah of course not. No one is that dumb.The point is that this was recycled from a 2015 article when there was a period they used the diesel engine for three months as they switched out batteries/power sources.
No one is claiming the original powering of a charging station is going to be 100 pct pure, at least not for some time. But it's better and cheaper than simple fossil fuel generated power for each vehicle.
Next, you'll point out that, for now, Tesla manufacturing plants are also not pure. And you'd be right. But you're setting an impossible standard.
This is essentially classic straw man. You pretend that the argument is that EVs have no carbon footprint and then mock the one they have, despite it being a fraction of a gas powered vehicle.
No one is claiming EVs are perfect so when you show they are not, and glibly smirk, it means nothing over the long haul.
Yes
Questions remain about how Tesla has sourced power in Calif.
In 2021, Tesla promised it would power all its Supercharger stations with renewable energy; it hasn’t.www.sfgate.com
“I discovered that Tesla’s battery swap station was not in fact being made available to owners who regularly drove between California’s two largest cities,” Niedermeyer wrote in a May 2022 exposé for Slate. “Instead, the company was running diesel generators to power additional Superchargers (the kind that take 30 to 60 minutes to recharge a battery) to handle the holiday rush, their exhaust mingling with the unmistakable smell of bulls—t.”
impossible standard? that is the 2035 goal for you nutcases. learn to love it.The point is that this was recycled from a 2015 article when there was a period they used the diesel engine for three months as they switched out batteries/power sources.
No one is claiming the original powering of a charging station is going to be 100 pct pure, at least not for some time. But it's better and cheaper than simple fossil fuel generated power for each vehicle.
Next, you'll point out that, for now, Tesla manufacturing plants are also not pure. And you'd be right. But you're setting an impossible standard.
This is essentially classic straw man. You pretend that the argument is that EVs have no carbon footprint and then mock the one they have, despite it being a fraction of a gas powered vehicle.
No one is claiming EVs are perfect so when you show they are not, and glibly smirk, it means nothing over the long haul.
EV’s are currently so good that the federal government has to bribe people to buy them. Additionally you have state governments offering a helping hand by mandating the cessation of selling gasoline powered vehicles after a certain date.The point is that this was recycled from a 2015 article when there was a period they used the diesel engine for three months as they switched out batteries/power sources.
No one is claiming the original powering of a charging station is going to be 100 pct pure, at least not for some time. But it's better and cheaper than simple fossil fuel generated power for each vehicle.
Next, you'll point out that, for now, Tesla manufacturing plants are also not pure. And you'd be right. But you're setting an impossible standard.
This is essentially classic straw man. You pretend that the argument is that EVs have no carbon footprint and then mock the one they have, despite it being a fraction of a gas powered vehicle.
No one is claiming EVs are perfect so when you show they are not, and glibly smirk, it means nothing over the long haul.