total number of fouls are always skewed when one team starts fouling (Duke) at the end of the game. Figure 4-5 of them came then. Otherwise, fairly even. That said, they did “let them play” which went both ways but benefited us. No one complained about the finger graze on the three that wasn’t called on the next trip down the floor when it happened to JJJ. The Roach reversal, etc.If the foul numbers were reversed, 17 on Tennessee and 11 on Duke, along with the score, none of these talking heads would say a word about the officiating. They’re just sour because their precious Blue Devils got smacked around like the bunch of soft rag dolls they are.
Yes. The integrity of the game is at stake unless our “thugs” get reigned in. How much you bet we can’t fart without getting whistled next game?Bottom line: ESPN along with a couple of other outlets are trying to craft a narrative so that our next game is whistled tight. They want the Vols out because we destroyed their narrative of the red hot Blue Devils going on to win it all
Yes. The integrity of the game is at stake unless our “thugs” get reigned in. How much you bet we can’t fart without getting whistled next game?
Yes. And those were fouls (not flagrant) and were called as such. The flopping also likely didn’t buy any sympathy from the Refs. They were likely embarrassed after they reviewed the play where SV grazed the guys face with the ball and he acted like Mike Tyson just punched him in the face.The officiating will almost certainly go against us in a way we’ve not seen before. We will just have to play through it as best we can.
I say all of this not excusing some of Uros’ early antics in the Duke game, but what the media refuses to accept because it doesn’t fit their narrative is that those two early fouls of his don’t encapsulate the entire game. It’s fair to say those two fouls were excessive, but not at no point for the remainder of the game did we do anything that a sane person could consider to be excessive.
Yes. And those were fouls (not flagrant) and were called as such. The flopping also likely didn’t buy any sympathy from the Refs. They were likely embarrassed after they reviewed the play where SV grazed the guys face with the ball and he acted like Mike Tyson just punched him in the face.
Tshiebwe gets away with murder on dang near every possession. Cry me a river.
Naturally, ESPN has no recollection of that play or our first basket of the game where Olivier got shoved in the back by Flopikowski. There are other calls that went Duke’s way that isn’t written anywhere in the media’s revisionist history of the game.
I don't recall ever seeing that call, either.Don’t know that I had ever previously seen a foul on a ball grazing a player. Not like Santi hit the guy in the face purposely for goodness sakes.
Let’s not act like because the ESPN dudes suck that Charles Barkley is 1985 Billy Packer either. Barkley couldn’t name five NCAA players before Thursday.