Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

#9,279
#9,279
Orangeslice13 said:
Yet people still line up to work for him.
It’s amazing.
They all seem to leave the same way though
Click to expand...

He can barely field a competent legal team. Two of his attorneys quit as soon as they read the indictment. He's got problems and 'but hillary' and 'this is a witchhunt' isn't a legal defense against actual evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#9,283
#9,283
Septic said:
He can barely field a competent legal team. Two of his attorneys quit as soon as they read the indictment. He's got problems and 'but hillary' and 'this is a witchhunt' isn't a legal defense against actual evidence.
Click to expand...
Dude
Nothing is going to happen to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,286
#9,286
Septic said:
He can barely field a competent legal team. Two of his attorneys quit as soon as they read the indictment. He's got problems and 'but hillary' and 'this is a witchhunt' isn't a legal defense against actual evidence.
Click to expand...
Doesn't help that he thinks lawyers aren't supposed to take notes.
 
#9,288
#9,288
Orangeslice13 said:
Dude
Nothing is going to happen to him.
Click to expand...


You mean nothing like the conviction he was handed a few weeks ago for sexual abuse and defamation? Multiple felony charges is already
quite /something/.

If you mean that MAGA doesn't care that he's deeply corrupt and breaks laws, rules and protocols and respects no one but himself, now THAT I can agree with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#9,289
#9,289
tvolsfan said:
If that's true, I would recommend he stops his delusional social media rants.
Click to expand...
Those don’t matter any more that the attempt to prosecute him.
It’s all theater.
I’m way beyond ready to move on from the same old crap from both parties. But we will probably be stuck choosing between two 80 year old white guys…..again.


I’d lose my mind if we wound up with a fresh start.
Something like TulsiG vs Tim Scott.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Vol since 77
#9,290
#9,290
turbovol said:
You mean nothing like the conviction he was handed a few weeks ago for sexual abuse and defamation? Multiple felony charges is already
quite /something/.

If you mean that MAGA doesn't care that he's deeply corrupt and breaks laws, rules and protocols and respects no one but himself, now THAT I can agree with.
Click to expand...
Biden or Trump?
I’m not seeing any real difference in the two.
Only people from the tribes do.
 
#9,291
#9,291
turbovol said:
You mean nothing like the conviction he was handed a few weeks ago for sexual abuse and defamation? Multiple felony charges is already
quite /something/.

If you mean that MAGA doesn't care that he's deeply corrupt and breaks laws, rules and protocols and respects no one but himself, now THAT I can agree with.
Click to expand...
Hold on….conviction?
Well when does he report to jail?


Oh, so nothing actually happened to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,293
#9,293
turbovol said:
You mean nothing like the conviction he was handed a few weeks ago for sexual abuse and defamation? Multiple felony charges is already
quite /something/.

If you mean that MAGA doesn't care that he's deeply corrupt and breaks laws, rules and protocols and respects no one but himself, now THAT I can agree with.
Click to expand...
For as much as you cast aspersions on other posters you should probably clean your posts up. Trump hasn't been found guilty of anything. He was found liable. And that's a massive difference. Government vs civil. And I say this knowing I get shat wrong too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,294
#9,294
Tucker Carlson reveals the 'precise moment' Washington decided to 'send Donald Trump to prison' in third Twitter show - as he claims former president has made a 'blood enemy' of the Federal Government and slams charges

Tucker Carlson claimed on Tuesday night that Donald Trump was indicted because he dared to challenge the U.S. military industry, and question America's role in international conflicts.

He declared that the elite in Washington, D.C., decided to 'take Trump out' because he rejected involvement in foreign wars, and accused the intelligence community of lying about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction.

'It's been inevitable since February 16, 2016,' said Carlson, referencing a Republican primary debate held in Greenville, South Carolina.

'That's the day Donald Trump made a blood enemy of the largest and most powerful organization in human history, which would be the federal Government.'

Carlson said Trump was 'doomed' when he condemned the Iraq invasion, and told the South Carolina audience: 'They lied. They knew there were no weapons of mass destruction.'

Carlson added: 'Seven and a half years later, we can point to the precise moment that permanent Washington decided to send Donald Trump to prison.'

Tucker Carlson reveals the 'precise moment' Washington decided to send Donald Trump to prison | Daily Mail Online
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#9,295
#9,295
Trump says grand jury wasn’t told about the Presidential Records Act or ‘Clinton’s sock case’


"Posting to Truth Social from his motorcade Tuesday after leaving his arraignment at a Miami federal courthouse, former President Donald Trump said the grand jury for his indictment was “never told” about the Presidential Records Act or “Clinton’s sock case.”

Clinton Sock Case:
From One America News Network:

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

“[Special counsel] Jack Smith is terrified of the only standing legal case decision from a court concerning the Presidential Records Act,” said Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations at Judicial Watch.

The case Farrell is referring to is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration – also known as the “Clinton sock drawer” case. Former President Bill Clinton created White House audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch and stored them in his sock drawer. Judicial Watch sued to obtain access to the tapes and lost.

“He took them from the White House with him into private life,” said Farrell. “There’s classified material on those tapes and arguably it’s the sort of running stream of consciousness record of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Pretty important stuff.”

Special counsel Jack Smith is currently investigating the 45th president for his handling of classified documents since departing the White House. But Farrell says the ruling in this specific case from 2012 exonerates Trump from any alleged wrongdoing.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump - Judicial Watch

----------------------

Liz Harrington
@realLizUSA
·
9h
“The Presidential Records Act allows the president to decide what records to return & what records to keep at the end of his presidency. & the National Archives can’t do anything about it. I know because I’m the lawyer who lost the ‘Clinton sock’ case.”

“In defending NARA, the Justice Department argued that NARA doesn’t have “a duty to engage in a never-ending search for potential presidential records” that weren’t provided to NARA by the president at the end of his term…

“Nor, the [DOJ] asserted, does the Presidential Records Act require NARA to appropriate potential presidential records forcibly. The government’s position was Congress had decided the president and the president alone decides what is a presidential record and what isn’t…

“He may take with him whatever records he chooses at the end of his term.”
 
Last edited:
#9,300
#9,300
ALL Republican nominees should Pledge to Pardon Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy says: 2024 hopeful vows to SUE Department of Justice in federal court if it doesn't hand over White House communications

Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy has demanded that his GOP nomination rivals promise to pardon Donald Trump if elected.

The 37-year-old biotech entrepreneur said the Trump prosecution 'will permanently damage public trust in our electoral process and our justice system.'

'Whoever among us is elected, our job of reuniting the nation will become daunting — if not impossible,' he said. 'I condemn these charges by the U.S. Department of Justice.'

'I have signed a commitment to pardon President Trump promptly on January 20, 2025, for the federal charges in United States of America v. Donald J. Trump and [former valet] Waltine Nauta,' the 37-year-old biotech entrepreneur told reporters.

72091225-12190341-image-a-1_1686675160201.jpg


The GOP hopeful demanded that his Republican rivals pledge to pardon Donald Trump if he is convicted

ALL Republican nominees should pledge to pardon Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy says: | Daily Mail Online
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol, davethevol and OrangeBoro
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top