RikidyBones
Formerly utvols88
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 39,346
- Likes
- 97,615
What source(s) of information have you formed this opinion of mail-in voting from? It is wholly inaccurate on multiple fronts. I'm going to post one video, and four links to non-news media sources, which I will also label. These sources of information should alleviate your concerns if you take the time to watch the video, and read through the provided sourced-material.
^^^^ County Seat (Utah) ^^^^
Is Voting by Mail Safe and Reliable? We Asked State and Local Elections Officials | Bipartisan Policy Center
^^^^ Bi-Partisan Policy Center ^^^^
Table 14: How States Verify Voted Absentee/Mail Ballots
^^^^ National Conference of State Legislatures ^^^^
How does vote-by-mail work and does it increase election fraud?
^^^^ Brookings ^^^^
Mail-in Ballots Are Secure, Confidential, and Trustworthy
^^^^ Columbia University ^^^^
Yes. His post. I’m confident you’re smart enough to figure this out.I did read the statute. It says what the articles claim it says.
View attachment 479500
And I didn't see much other than this:
View attachment 479499
Doesn't really say much. Maybe there is something else to review.
@volgr
The above post (which includes actual sources of information in support of my argument), runs counter to your narrative.
It is not well-known that mail-in voting had the "greatest opportunity for fraud," prior to 2020.
Please post a link to the findings of your "blue ribbon commission," and any other sources which support your claims... keeping in mind that none of the sources which I used were news media outlets, or politically partisan blogs. I'm the only one who ever posts links during discussions of election fraud. The rest of you just flap your gums.
I get the paywall. I don't subscribe to The Wall Street Journal.Do your homework
How did you miss this in all that research??
I get the paywall. I don't subscribe to The Wall Street Journal.
That obviously is a good source, but it also appears to be an opinion piece, from what little I could see of it... but at least you posted something. It's more than what most do.
‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” That quote isn’t from President Trump, who criticized mail-in voting this week after Wisconsin Democrats tried and failed to change an election at the last minute into an exclusively mail-in affair. It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.
What is a magistrate?
I would like to know the examples... and that commission you are evidently referring to was from 2005.
Like I said, that commission you are leaning on was from 2005... and motive doesn't prove anything by itself.Just put 2 and 2 together. You have a form of voting that a bi-partisan commission said is the largest potential source of voter fraud, many States littered their citizens with ballots (multiple ballots, ballots to past occupants at an apt/home, etc) and you had a segment of the population that believed the President to be Nazi'ish who should be stopped at all costs. Motive and opportunity.
Why after all this time has nothing been found? It’s not for lack of effort. There’s still people now looking for it, and shockingly it’s been mostly Republican voters that have been guilty of any kind of voter fraud.Just put 2 and 2 together. You have a form of voting that a bi-partisan commission said is the largest potential source of voter fraud, many States littered their citizens with ballots (multiple ballots, ballots to past occupants at an apt/home, etc) and you had a segment of the population that believed the President to be Nazi'ish who should be stopped at all costs. Motive and opportunity.
If your beef is with the "because of Trump" part, the reason why he is impartial isn't directly stated. He could technically be right. Unless there is a statement from the magistrate(wouldn't there be to justify recusing himself?), only he knows. You said "I want to know whether @Caculator was lying or being lied to". You act as though the contrary is proven when it's not.Yes. His post. I’m confident you’re smart enough to figure this out.
Why after all this time has nothing been found?