Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

So you didn’t read the statute. Ok.

Did you read the order? It was linked in one of your articles.
I did read the statute. It says what the articles claim it says.

Screenshot_20220811-140548_Chrome.jpg

And I didn't see much other than this:

Screenshot_20220811-140615_Drive.jpg

Doesn't really say much. Maybe there is something else to review.
 
What source(s) of information have you formed this opinion of mail-in voting from? It is wholly inaccurate on multiple fronts. I'm going to post one video, and four links to non-news media sources, which I will also label. These sources of information should alleviate your concerns if you take the time to watch the video, and read through the provided sourced-material.





^^^^ County Seat (Utah) ^^^^


Is Voting by Mail Safe and Reliable? We Asked State and Local Elections Officials | Bipartisan Policy Center

^^^^ Bi-Partisan Policy Center ^^^^


Table 14: How States Verify Voted Absentee/Mail Ballots

^^^^ National Conference of State Legislatures ^^^^


How does vote-by-mail work and does it increase election fraud?

^^^^ Brookings ^^^^


Mail-in Ballots Are Secure, Confidential, and Trustworthy

^^^^ Columbia University ^^^^

@volgr

The above post (which includes actual sources of information in support of my argument), runs counter to your narrative.

It is not well-known that mail-in voting had the "greatest opportunity for fraud," prior to 2020.

Please post a link to the findings of your "blue ribbon commission," and any other sources which support your claims... keeping in mind that none of the sources which I used were news media outlets, or politically partisan blogs. I'm the only one who ever posts links during discussions of election fraud. The rest of you just flap your gums.
 
@volgr

The above post (which includes actual sources of information in support of my argument), runs counter to your narrative.

It is not well-known that mail-in voting had the "greatest opportunity for fraud," prior to 2020.

Please post a link to the findings of your "blue ribbon commission," and any other sources which support your claims... keeping in mind that none of the sources which I used were news media outlets, or politically partisan blogs. I'm the only one who ever posts links during discussions of election fraud. The rest of you just flap your gums.

Do your homework
How did you miss this in all that research??
 


A little judge shopping. Find a friendly Judge who has watched the last few weeks of protests in front of SCOTUS Judge's houses, stalking them in restaurants, etc...easy call on the Judges part. He knows if he denies that warrant it is highly likely some leftist kook in the FBI or DoJ leaks his name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
I get the paywall. I don't subscribe to The Wall Street Journal.

That obviously is a good source, but it also appears to be an opinion piece, from what little I could see of it... but at least you posted something. It's more than what most do.

Here is a small snippet. It goes on to lay out multiple examples of mail in voter fraud.

‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” That quote isn’t from President Trump, who criticized mail-in voting this week after Wisconsin Democrats tried and failed to change an election at the last minute into an exclusively mail-in affair. It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
What is a magistrate?
Magistrates, who are hired by district judges to help them with routine matters, must determine whether law enforcement agents have established probable cause that a crime has been committed and that the search would uncover evidence of that crime.

"Being a magistrate judge is not a political position," Stefin said. "It's not whether someone's a Democrat or Republican."

He's not elected, or appointed, just somebody a Judge hires. I think the question arises as to what Judge hired him, and what's their leanings. Birds of a feather and all.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
I would like to know the examples... and that commission you are evidently referring to was from 2005.

Just put 2 and 2 together. You have a form of voting that a bi-partisan commission said is the largest potential source of voter fraud, many States littered their citizens with ballots (multiple ballots, ballots to past occupants at an apt/home, etc) and you had a segment of the population that believed the President to be Nazi'ish who should be stopped at all costs. Motive and opportunity.
 
They just did that to make sure nobody figured out that he’s actually ANTIFA.
Just like with everything else GOP related, it’s all about projection. Claim ANTIFA is a threat to American Democracy, only to have MAGA terrorists actually try and overturn democracy.
 
Just put 2 and 2 together. You have a form of voting that a bi-partisan commission said is the largest potential source of voter fraud, many States littered their citizens with ballots (multiple ballots, ballots to past occupants at an apt/home, etc) and you had a segment of the population that believed the President to be Nazi'ish who should be stopped at all costs. Motive and opportunity.
Like I said, that commission you are leaning on was from 2005... and motive doesn't prove anything by itself.
 
Just put 2 and 2 together. You have a form of voting that a bi-partisan commission said is the largest potential source of voter fraud, many States littered their citizens with ballots (multiple ballots, ballots to past occupants at an apt/home, etc) and you had a segment of the population that believed the President to be Nazi'ish who should be stopped at all costs. Motive and opportunity.
Why after all this time has nothing been found? It’s not for lack of effort. There’s still people now looking for it, and shockingly it’s been mostly Republican voters that have been guilty of any kind of voter fraud.
 
Just like with everything else GOP related, it’s all about projection. Claim ANTIFA is a threat to American Democracy, only to have MAGA terrorists actually try and overturn democracy.
Trying to overturn democracy and supporting those that try just shows that you love this country.
 
Yes. His post. I’m confident you’re smart enough to figure this out.
If your beef is with the "because of Trump" part, the reason why he is impartial isn't directly stated. He could technically be right. Unless there is a statement from the magistrate(wouldn't there be to justify recusing himself?), only he knows. You said "I want to know whether @Caculator was lying or being lied to". You act as though the contrary is proven when it's not.

Instead of being a , you could always say "we don't technically know what made him impartial" but you've taken the twat route more often, recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77
Why after all this time has nothing been found?

Saying nothing was found is yet another lie from you.

Trump's team after the election put Rudy in charge who then allowed Sidney Powell in. Big mistake as soon after we get the famous ghost of Hugo Chavez quote and Dominion voting machines...and the rest was history. Trump only has himself to blame. He once again listened to the wrong people and put that circus out there.

Look, Biden is the legitimate President as he was elected per Constitutional requirements, but the election was not administered legitimately. Dont piss on me and tell me its raining. Its ridiculous.
 

VN Store



Back
Top