NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,399
- Likes
- 7,862
I answered all of these questions in the post you quoted but apparently didn't read. The statues were built to be a public display of black inferiority, meant to intimidate black people and show former Confederates that their power wasn't threatened. The more the government sends that message, the more you're telling everyone in those areas that you're fine with all this "honor the Confederacy" **** and that you don't really care whether black people feel welcome in that place.
I answered all of these questions in the post you quoted but apparently didn't read. The statues were built to be a public display of black inferiority, meant to intimidate black people and show former Confederates that their power wasn't threatened. The more the government sends that message, the more you're telling everyone in those areas that you're fine with all this "honor the Confederacy" **** and that you don't really care whether black people feel welcome in that place.
You are absolutely right. Mt Rushmore was a desecration of a beautiful granite mountain. Blow it up.If you think we need giant statues to remember something, it's pretty hard to call yourself "the most reasonable."
If I said we needed a statue of Osama bin Laden in order to remember 9/11, how do you think that would go over?
You forgot the blue font on the part where... well I'll help you out.I also don't agree that every single statue was put up to intimidate. Maybe some were but you'd have to research every different scenario and no one has time to do that.
I also don't agree that every single statue was put up to intimidate. Maybe some were but you'd have to research every different scenario and no one has time to do that.
I also don't agree that every single statue was put up to intimidate. Maybe some were but you'd have to research every different scenario and no one has time to do that.
I'm willing to bet half of the city of Memphis had no idea any of these statues even existed until all this "let's tear everything down" movement started
It's funny how you mock any suggestion that this tear down the symbols of oppression sends any larger message about not offending people at any cost yet post the above over the top suggestion about the negative power of leaving them up.
I'm willing to bet half of the city of Memphis had no idea any of these statues even existed until all this "let's tear everything down" movement started
We do have a big freaking monument to 9/11.
The issue is you have American's who identify with those statues. Not from any slave holding stand point. 95% of southerners never owned slaves. Its a symbol of their history, they can look at it and say that is the man your great great whatever served with. Or if they were a good general from their state they can look and say "this was a good general from our state". I would say for the same 95% of southerners these statues have nothing to do with the general personally or slaves.
also feeling free to tear down old monuments opens up some real interesting doors to any historic building/monument/marking/whatever that is otherwise protected. The north had slaves too, plenty of things on the chopping block outside of the south if we want to start pointing fingers.
Were Germans "sending a message about not offending people at any cost" when they removed Nazi statues? Does anyone give a crap about that message? Was it "over the top" of them to decide they wanted to look at Nazis with shame rather than putting them on a pedestal?
They fought and died for their cause, but chose a s***ty cause. When you do that, you risk shame. I'm sure there are individuals in Germany who honor the Nazis, and talk about how they didn't really support the Holocaust, or had no choice but to fight, or whatever...but as a larger society, there was no way in hell that Germany was going to endorse or idolize those people, and neither should we.
Were Germans "sending a message about not offending people at any cost" when they removed Nazi statues? Does anyone give a crap about that message? Was it "over the top" of them to decide they wanted to look at Nazis with shame rather than putting them on a pedestal?
They fought and died for their cause, but chose a s***ty cause. When you do that, you risk shame. I'm sure there are individuals in Germany who honor the Nazis, and talk about how they didn't really support the Holocaust, or had no choice but to fight, or whatever...but as a larger society, there was no way in hell that Germany was going to endorse or idolize those people, and neither should we.