mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 56,974
- Likes
- 97,218
I'm starting to wonder if this plan might actually backfire. You've pissed off a lot of people who a)paid off their loans, b)don't think taxpayers should further subsidize these choices (especially those that didn't attend college) and c) think $10k isn't enough. You may have just encouraged the wrong group of people to get out and vote in November.
It's not printing money, but writing off money that was expected to be paid to the government that no longer will. Its a revenue cut. Same as a tax cut or PPP loan forgiveness. Love watching people who idolize tax cuts twist themselves into knots arguing how this is so much different. It's all the same.It's not better than doing nothing.
It's printing new money causing more inflation, making others pay for loans they didn't take out and enhancing the problem.
If it's bad for the people that took out the loans to pay it back, it's that much worse for people who didn't take out the loans to pay it back.
You being "fine with it" proves my point.
The notion that people who can't afford 10k in loans would be better off with even more inflation instead is a ridiculous one.
You have got to be kidding. Banks loaning money that they KNOW they will get a return on is not 'stupid'. Universities increasing their rates because they know the income stream is guaranteed is not 'stupid'. In both of those cases, it is good business. I think it could be construed as somewhat unethical in making loans for PhDs in gender studies and other such rot, but if you KNOW you are going to make a return on your investment, there is nothing 'stupid' about it.The program was stupid. The banks were stupid. The universities were stupid.
I hold them all more responsible for their stupidity than an 18 year old kid and I think universities and banks should feel some of the pain.
To your point - inflation raising average costs $460/mo. Applying that towards a 10K loan (even at 8%) covers the loan in just under 2 years. To the extent this raises or even extends the high inflationary period it could be a net loss for the borrower.
It's not printing money, but writing off money that was expected to be paid to the government that no longer will. Same as a tax cut or PPP loan forgiveness. Love watching people who idolize tax cuts twist themselves into knots arguing how this is so much different.
No... it isn't. Doing nothing is precisely what they should be doing. This is not a crisis for the vast majority of Americans.I'll bite. I'm fine with it and I, at the same time, think there is more that can be done. Happy? Reminds me of the PPP loans. Reactionary, unfocused yet better than doing nothing.
You’re approaching from an analytical viewpoint.
This is a farce and it was never meant to help anyone, other than some politicians. A gimmick to purchase power.