My point was about the possibility for someone to find ways to interpret scripture as permission for violent acts. I don't think the Quran is significantly more violent than the old testament, but yet some go on here as if it is advocating the slaughtering of the world.
And I think it is all about the individual. There are many Muslims that disregard the nonsense in the Qu'ran and focus on the good stuff. Just like there are many Christians that disregard the nonsense in the Bible and focus on the good stuff.
Whoops, meant kill, not beat. Mark 7:9.
Then kill anyone who doesn't believe in Jesus. Luke 19: 22-27. I better watch my back!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
My opinion is it is the perfect example of the danger of religious superstition. Is there any other complete waste of human life in history than those lost fighting over a worthless patch of desert on the Mediterranean?
"Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors"
"But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace"
"God does not forbid you from dealing kindly and justly with those who do not fight you for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes: for God loveth those who are just."
"Those who believe and those who are Jews, Christians, and Sabeans; any who believe in God and the Last Day and work righteousness shall have their reward with their Lord and on them shall be no fear and they will not grieve"
What a sinister book!
Considering Islam has only been around for 700 years(Christianity has a 1300 year headstart) I would think it it is at least equal.
Only looking at today is shortsighted. We'll see where Islam is in another 600 years and compare it to today to see where we stand.
What good stuff is there to focus on in the Qu'ran??
Ask one of your muslim friends if he believes that islamic sharia law should be implemented worldwide.
Of course islam advocates lying, taqqiya, to cover for itself when not in a position of absolute authority.
It is ludicrous to try to advance the idea that the Bible and the Qu'ran teach the same things, idiotic and ignorant.
why? society in and of itself is far more advanced than it was during the crusades. it's a lot easier to get uneducated superstitious idiots in the 1300s to attack a society than it with today's knowledge. are we supposed to act like muslims are 700 years behind the rest of us cullturally?
As OE said, western civilaztion is 1300 years ahead of Muslim societies. Muslim societies of today almost mirror the uneducated societies of middle age Christianity. IMO, that is the chief reason why Islam is more dangerous than Christianity right now. It is middle age thought with 21st century weapons.
The simple answer to the bolded is absolutely.
Never said that. But we are to try and understand them. It is the first step to solving the real root problem. I don't think anyone would say making information and education more available in the middle east would be nothing but good.
As OE said, western civilaztion is 1300 years ahead of Muslim societies. Muslim societies of today almost mirror the uneducated societies of middle age Christianity. IMO, that is the chief reason why Islam is more dangerous than Christianity right now. It is middle age thought with 21st century weapons.
The simple answer to the bolded is absolutely.
Nice post... and for the most part I agree. However, if many of the Muslim leaders had their way, then much of the Muslim civilization will remain in the middle ages.
OH, I did not mean to indicate that you had said that.
Believe it or not, I was actually asking a question instead of just smarting off.
More education would be great....but....do they actually want it?
Same can be said for the church of the middle ages. I don't pretend to have the answer for modern day Islam. Some sort of enlightemnet is needed. All I know is there is a categorical difference between the Muslim of the middle east and the Muslim integrated in modern society (generally speaking of course).
This is kind of why I don't necessarily agree with instituting democracy in the middle east right now. There is no reason not to believe they will not vote themselves a full fledged theocracy if left to their own accord.
No argument it is a means of control............................ this is going to sound crazy and narrowminded and I don't like Catholics...... but look at the history of the Catholic church doing the same thing.