Fox news "fair and balanced" yeah RIGHT

#401
#401
NorthwestVol said:
If you are a Fox faithful, I can understand why you don't know the difference between leaning and lying.

MSNBC-6-9 a.m. Joe Scarborough, a right wing nut job.
9-11 a.m. Dylan Ratigan, a business Repub.
11-noon Carlos whathisname, a Dem.
12-1p Nora O'Donnell, a Repub, but even handed
1-2p.m. Andrea Mitchell, a Repub and wife of Alan Greenspan. Bland anchors between two and five.
Matthews "the Clinton hater", Shultz, Olbermann,and Maddow who are all partisan Dems end the day.

MSNBSC is a slightly liberal network unlike ALL the Fox RNC talking point anchors and Repub management. It's hardly an accident that a Repub political operative, Roger Ailes, runs Fox News. RNC talking points are lies and gross exaggerations. Same for the DNC. The difference is that the DNC doesn't control MSNBC. The RNC controls Fox's message of the day. Defeated Republicans can't accept objectivity. Only the echo chamber willl do.
Click to expand...


you are misinformed.

funny how the dem's bitched and moaned and hated bush for 8 yrs. now that obama gets criticized it's unfair.
 
#402
#402
NorthwestVol said:
If you are a Fox faithful, I can understand why you don't know the difference between leaning and lying.

MSNBC-6-9 a.m. Joe Scarborough, a right wing nut job.
9-11 a.m. Dylan Ratigan, a business Repub.
11-noon Carlos whathisname, a Dem.
12-1p Nora O'Donnell, a Repub, but even handed
1-2p.m. Andrea Mitchell, a Repub and wife of Alan Greenspan. Bland anchors between two and five.
Matthews "the Clinton hater", Shultz, Olbermann,and Maddow who are all partisan Dems end the day.

MSNBSC is a slightly liberal network unlike ALL the Fox RNC talking point anchors and Repub management. It's hardly an accident that a Repub political operative, Roger Ailes, runs Fox News. RNC talking points are lies and gross exaggerations. Same for the DNC. The difference is that the DNC doesn't control MSNBC. The RNC controls Fox's message of the day. Defeated Republicans can't accept objectivity. Only the echo chamber willl do.
Click to expand...

Droski is correct, you aren't very bright.
 
#403
#403
The chairman of GE (which owns MSNBC, NBC, and CNBC) is a key obama supporter and has been by his side in multiple press conferences this year.
 
#404
#404
CNBC SWEATS 'OBAMA-BASHING'- New York Post

THE top suits and some of the on-air talent at CNBC were recently ordered to a top-secret meeting with General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt and NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker to discuss whether they've turned into the President Obama-bashing network, Page Six has learned.

"It was an intensive, three-hour dinner at 30 Rock which Zucker himself was behind," a source familiar with the powwow told us. "There was a long discussion about whether CNBC has become too conservative and is beating up on Obama too much. There's great concern that CNBC is now the anti-Obama network. The whole meeting was really kind of creepy."
 
#405
#405
Saying MSNBC is slightly liberal is like saying the Octomom got slightly pregnant.

And kudos to the name change. MSNBSC, indeed it is.
 
#406
#406
NorthwestVol said:
If you are a Fox faithful, I can understand why you don't know the difference between leaning and lying.

MSNBC-6-9 a.m. Joe Scarborough, a right wing nut job.
9-11 a.m. Dylan Ratigan, a business Repub.
11-noon Carlos whathisname, a Dem.
12-1p Nora O'Donnell, a Repub, but even handed
1-2p.m. Andrea Mitchell, a Repub and wife of Alan Greenspan. Bland anchors between two and five.
Matthews "the Clinton hater", Shultz, Olbermann,and Maddow who are all partisan Dems end the day.

MSNBSC is a slightly liberal network unlike ALL the Fox RNC talking point anchors and Repub management. It's hardly an accident that a Repub political operative, Roger Ailes, runs Fox News. RNC talking points are lies and gross exaggerations. Same for the DNC. The difference is that the DNC doesn't control MSNBC. The RNC controls Fox's message of the day. Defeated Republicans can't accept objectivity. Only the echo chamber willl do.
Click to expand...

It looks like you may be the one who is incapable of objectivity on this particular subject. Your analysis above is a glaring example!
 
#407
#407
I can't speak for what MSNBC shows during the day because I have a job, but if you don't think they are screaming liberal and conservative haters at night you're crazy.
 
#409
#409
joevol320 said:
oh and olbertool is just a bastion of knowledge and insight. katie kurick is just brilliant. if you're saying glenn beck's fans are stupid, then dem fans are complete fools
Click to expand...


Olberman or Kurick = 10,000,000,000 X smarter than Beck.

Actually, I'd say that a dead squirrel is about 20 X smarter than Beck.
 
#414
#414
lawgator1 said:
Olberman or Kurick = 10,000,000,000 X smarter than Beck.

Actually, I'd say that a dead squirrel is about 20 X smarter than Beck.
Click to expand...

Beck is weird and a bit unglued, not stupid. There is a difference. I don't like him because he is too emotional and a bit conspiracy-ish, but he isn't stupid. I do think Olberman is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is.

And like everyone else, I don't watch Kurick. Is she still on?
 
#415
#415
i honestly can't think of a single non teleprompter intelligent thing olberman or kurick (or obama) has said. kurick was hired to attract the oprah crowd for christ sake.
 
#416
#416
IPorange said:
Beck is weird and a bit unglued, not stupid. There is a difference. I don't like him because he is too emotional and a bit conspiracy-ish, but he isn't stupid. I do think Olberman is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is.

And like everyone else, I don't watch Kurick. Is she still on?
Click to expand...


The only thing worse than Beck's reasoning is the knolwedge base with which he starts. He truly does not understand the terms he throws around, and in particular the word "socialist."

Folks on here make a much better reasoned argument than Beck does that Obama's policies have socialist aspects to them. Beck just uses the term because its fashionable on the right to do so at the moment. But if you listen to him even a little bit closely, it becomes apparent very quickly that he really does not understand the concept.
 
#418
#418
I read an interview with Olbermann somewhere and he said he is convinced a lot of the conservative commentators are in it for the money and don’t really care about the politics. If there was as much money in it for them to switch over to the left they would do it in a heartbeat.
 
#419
#419
rjd970 said:
I read an interview with Olbermann somewhere and he said he is convinced a lot of the conservative commentators are in it for the money and don’t really care about the politics. If there was as much money in it for them to switch over to the left they would do it in a heartbeat.
Click to expand...

They make so much money because a) they're good at it and b)there's a demand for it. I've said it before, you guys who hate Rush and co. so much need to realize that the reason they do what they do is because for years there was no other voice for conservatives. Take away the heavily left leaning bias in the media and you take away talk radio's success.
 
#420
#420
rjd970 said:
I read an interview with Olbermann somewhere and he said he is convinced a lot of the conservative commentators are in it for the money and don’t really care about the politics. If there was as much money in it for them to switch over to the left they would do it in a heartbeat.
Click to expand...

sounds like something Olberman would say, and to a larger extent, something all liberals would say. If there's no money in it, the right doesn't want anything to do with it. That must be why Limbaugh, Hannity, Wilkow, etc. all started out as dirt poor flaming liberals.

Olberman is an asshat.
 
#422
#422
rjd970 said:
I read an interview with Olbermann somewhere and he said he is convinced a lot of the conservative commentators are in it for the money and don’t really care about the politics. If there was as much money in it for them to switch over to the left they would do it in a heartbeat.
Click to expand...

Olbermann is a fool blinded by his contempt for anything conservative. He closely resembles Hannity in this respect. Both of them are partisan hacks who would take a jab at the opposition, even when they don't believe what they are saying. If Olbermann is so smart why doesn't he see half of his idiotic rhetoric for what it is? Bottom line is the man is not as smart as many think he is, or he is in it for the money or fame.
 
#423
#423
the main difference between Olberman and Hannity (outside of their diametrically opposed political views) is that Hannity isn't afraid to debate someone who's his political opposite. When is the last time Olberman had the guts to debate someone like Liz Cheney or Mike Pence?
 
#424
#424
lawgator1 said:
The only thing worse than Beck's reasoning is the knolwedge base with which he starts. He truly does not understand the terms he throws around, and in particular the word "socialist."

Folks on here make a much better reasoned argument than Beck does that Obama's policies have socialist aspects to them. Beck just uses the term because its fashionable on the right to do so at the moment. But if you listen to him even a little bit closely, it becomes apparent very quickly that he really does not understand the concept.
Click to expand...

What is it so hard to understand Beck?

He is a shock jock like Howard Stern.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top