QuickSmurf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,962
- Likes
- 3,062
Pascal's wager is a con. As Hitchens used to say, "We are born sick and then commanded on threat of eternal torture to be well". I just don't find god as loving and forgiving as a lot of people do.
I believe your error (and Hitchens') is the assumption that you earn salvation. The Bible is clear that no man can "earn" his place is heaven. It is given to you. All you do is accept it. That seems pretty loving and forgiving to me.
If he sincerely repents and finds God again afterwards yes indeed
The Bible is clear that no man can "earn" his place is heaven. It is given to you. All you do is accept it. That seems pretty loving and forgiving to me.
That's insane. The reason I think most people have a religion is because of a theory presented by an renaissance scientist ( Pascal I think). Basically, its basically betting if there is a heaven or not. It's a more risky bet to not accept there is not a heaven than to accept heaven. It's upside vs. Downside.
So if a devoted Christian does a massacre, he gets a spot in heaven?
Without a God, why do you have an objection to mass murder? I mean you have an innate conscience that signals to you that some things are wrong. That is contrary to the idea of survival of the fittest. We don't find that in other lifeforms on our planet.
Just trying to point out that using God or the bible to establish morals is not the best idea.
It's not the idea of what is or is not moral. It's the idea that humans have some natural conscious that dictates to them that there are certain things that they know are wrong. Where does that come from? Other species operate on survival of the fittest. No consciousness about their actions.
It's not the idea of what is or is not moral. It's the idea that humans have some natural conscious that dictates to them that there are certain things that they know are wrong. Where does that come from? Other species operate on survival of the fittest. No consciousness about their actions.
That is a scary thought isn't it, Humanity totally ruled by the law of natural selection? Only the strongest and most ruthless survive.
I've heard this before, that we send ourselves to hell instead of god sending us to hell, but I've never bought that based upon the apparent nature of god. Here's my logical process to think through this:God is the opposite of sin. He is perfect and cannot abide sin. Our sins seperate us from God. God doesn't want anyone to suffer in hell for eternity. He wants us all to be reunited with Him in heaven. However, we cannot because we are sinful creatures. That is why Jesus was sent to the Earth. He lived a blameless sinless life. He was then beaten, tortured, tormented, and executed. He was sacrificed so that all who have faith in Him and seek to live as he lived may be redeemed to the Father. God doesn't punish us with eternal damnation. We punish ourselves by not placing our faith in God and Jesus. Our actions or inactions are what damn us. Not God.
Yet what happens to you if you can't bring yourself to accept it? Yeah God is real lovable when you believe in him, but if you don't, he is the exact opposite of loving and forgiving. Sending someone to eternal torment is about the worst thing anyone could do. Hitler doesn't even deserve eternal punishment. He deserved to be punished for sure, but no one deserves to be tortured until the end of time.I believe your error (and Hitchens') is the assumption that you earn salvation. The Bible is clear that no man can "earn" his place is heaven. It is given to you. All you do is accept it. That seems pretty loving and forgiving to me.
Yet what happens to you if you can't bring yourself to accept it? Yeah God is real lovable when you believe in him, but if you don't, he is the exact opposite of loving and forgiving. Sending someone to eternal torment is about the worst thing anyone could do. Hitler doesn't even deserve eternal punishment. He deserved to be punished for sure, but no one deserves to be tortured until the end of time.
Also, the supposed reason we are given salvation is because Jesus died on the cross. Right? Can someone explain to me how a man (either the son of God or not) being crucified 2000 years ago saves me from sins or absolves me of my responsibilities towards my fellow human beings in any way, shape, or form?
I find it rather hideous that a person can be ridiculously horrible towards others, kill people, rape people, rob people, etc., but then can be allowed into heaven if they just repent of their sins and accept God. Yet I, who couldn't bring myself to do something as evil as murder or rape, and if I somehow could bring myself to do something that wicked, would not be able to live with myself and would kill myself out of guilt and shame. I deserve eternal damnation simply because I don't believe that God exists, but the guy who ran around ruining and destroying peoples' lives, truly hurting people, gets saved? Not cool God, not cool at all.
I've heard this before, that we send ourselves to hell instead of god sending us to hell, but I've never bought that based upon the apparent nature of god. Here's my logical process to think through this:
1. God created everything, including Satan and Hell.
2. God created the rules and criteria for which souls are judged.
3. God is the one who carries out that judgement.
4. Everything happens according to God's divine plan.
5. Therefore, God is ultimately responsible for everything, including everyone who has been sent to hell.
I'll put it another way. Personally, I don't want to go to hell. Obviously, who would? I've never killed anyone, never robbed anyone, never raped anyone, never kidnapped anyone, never burned anyone's house down, never really beaten anyone up (except for on a football field), to be honest, I don't think I've ever truly wronged anyone in my life. Of course I've lied (who hasn't?), but I don't think I told such a nasty lie that it ended up really hurting someone. Obviously I was naughty kid sometimes and disobeyed my parents (yet again who hasn't?), but again, never to the point where I truly hurt them.
My point being is that I consider myself a good person. I'm a pretty kind, compassionate, loving, and thoughtful dude. I think anyone in my family, friends, and people I've met would say the same thing. The thing is I just can't bring myself to believe in god based upon the available evidence. There just isn't sufficient evidence to convince me that he actually exists. It's like how am I supposed to believe in something that I don't. I compare it to Santa Claus (I'm assuming we're all adults here but Spoiler Alert anyways), could any of you suddenly just force yourself to start believing in Santa? It's like once you've figured out that he isn't real, then it's hard to go back and bring yourself to believing that he is.
Yet because I can't bring myself to believe in God, based on the lack of evidence, I deserve to be tortured in Hell for eternity? Whaaaat? Not 5 years, 10 years, 50 years. Not even a sentence equivalent to my lifespan or 2 lifespans or 10 lifespans. No! FOREVER! Infinite punishment for finite crimes is illogical and unjust.
You also have to consider that God supposedly created each of us to be exactly the way we are. He intricately designed and planned our life. He supposedly designed me to be born a Christian and then lose my faith and become an agnostic atheist. He designed the Muslims to be Muslim, the Buddhists to be Buddhist, the Mormons to be Mormon, etc. Therefore didn't he condemn anyone who doesn't get saved in their lifetime to eternal damnation before they were even born? I know people call both Jesus and God the savior. Yet what are we being saved from? Hell? Yes. Our Sins? Yes. But ultimately we are being saved from God's judgement. He's the boss, he makes the rules, it's his universe and he is responsible for every single last bit of it. If he exists...