jakez4ut
Patience... It's what's for dinner
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 72,001
- Likes
- 130,719
I think it's a mistake and I think it's also going to cost them when a final decision is made.
I can't for the life of me figure out why they wouldn't want bigger LB's if they are intent on running this 4-2-5 they've come up with. They continue to recruit like they are running a traditional 4-3, with how they want to convert all these LB's with any size whatsoever to DE and all these Safeties to LB.
Converting smaller safeties to LB when you only put 2 out there is a recipe for disaster in this league. You need 2 big, physical LB's who can play in the box.
i have to believe the 4-3 is where he's headed back to.
personnel right now is a little iffy on doing that effectively at LB, but it's a little better than it was, #'s wise, last year.
i do agree on the recruiting trend though. i would expect us to be going after more true OLB's....